Medication Reconciliation at Discharge: Impact on Patient's Care (CONCIVILLE)

July 13, 2020 updated by: Frederique Bouchand, Centre d'Investigation Clinique et Technologique 805

A Comparative Pilot Study in an Infectious Disease Department Assessing the Impact of Medication Reconciliation at Discharge Associated With a Patient's Counseling Session, Both Provided by a Pharmacist, on Patient's Care After Discharge

Patient's discharge from hospital is associated with iatrogenic events for 12 to 17% of patients. This risk may be linked with discontinuity of care between hospital physicians and Primary Care Physician (PCP). The investigators aim to assess in this study the impact of medication reconciliation at discharge associated with a patient's counseling session, both provided by a pharmacist, on patient's care after discharge. To demonstrate the interest of medication reconciliation at discharge we expect a reduction by 15% of the number of prescription changes not maintained by the PCP after discharge.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patient's discharge from hospital is associated with iatrogenic events for 12 to 17% of patients and may lead to further hospitalization. This risk may be linked with discontinuity of care between hospital physicians and Primary Care Physician (PCP) and from discrepancies between patient's current medications and drugs prescribed at discharge.

Preventing adverse drug events (ADEs) remains a patient safety priority not only in hospitals but also across the continuum of care for patients. Implementing medication reconciliation at all transitions in care is an effective strategy for preventing discrepancies and ADEs. Medication reconciliation prevents and corrects medication errors by promoting transmissions of complete and accurate information about medicines.

Furthermore, ADEs may be the result of a failure to understand and manage post-discharge care needs and can lead to hospital readmission.

We assume that medication reconciliation at discharge, secondarily transmitted to the PCP with a discharge counseling session between the patient and a clinical pharmacist could have a positive impact on the maintenance of therapeutic optimization decided by in-hospital practitioners.

In order to evaluate this assumption, we will conduct a randomized controlled study on 120 patients (as a reduction by 15% of the number of prescription changes not maintained by the PCP after discharge is expected).

The follow-up will last 1 month after discharge from hospital. The first prescription from the PCP will be collected and analyzed. In addition, patients and PCPs will be contacted by the pharmacist to answer specific questionnaires.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the impact of medication reconciliation at discharge associated with a patient's counseling session, both provided by a pharmacist, on patient's care after discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Garches, France, 92150
        • Hopital Raymond Poincare

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 18 years old
  • hospitalized in infectious disease department
  • with a chronic disease and a current medical prescription including at least three drugs
  • discharged home or nursing home
  • not opposed to the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • foreigners, patients under legal guardianship
  • advanced dementia (MMS<20) or phone tracking impossible
  • primary care physician opposed to answer questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Medical and pharmaceutical management (at admission, during hospitalization and at discharge) will follow standard healthcare procedures of the department.
Experimental: Reconciliation group
Standard healthcare procedures and pharmacist's involvement
In addition to standard healthcare procedures, the pharmacist will analyze discharge prescriptions and proceed to medication reconciliation. A patient's counseling session will also be provided by the pharmacist. A reconciliation mail will be addressed to the PCP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of in-hospital prescription changes not maintained by the Primary Care Physician (PCP) one month after discharge.
Time Frame: 1 month

The number of in-hospital prescription changes will be evaluated only on discharge prescription transmitted to the patient (after prescription analysis by a clinical pharmacist in the "reconciliation" group)

Compared to the list of all current medications at admission, in-hospital prescription changes include the following:

  • Adding a new drug
  • Discontinuing a drug
  • Drug switch
  • Modifying a dose

Among these hospital prescription changes, some will not be maintained by the PCP one month after discharge.

In-hospital prescription changes not maintained by the PCP will be evaluated on the first prescription of the PCP following discharge.

1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frederique BOUCHAND, PharmD, APHP
  • Study Director: Benjamin DAVIDO, MD, APHP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-A01628-43

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medication Reconciliation

Clinical Trials on Reconciliation

Subscribe