Guaranteeing the Continuity of the Care Pathway for the Elderly Patient: Evaluation of a Territorial Approach of Clinical Pharmacy (CONPARMED)

August 4, 2021 updated by: Rennes University Hospital

Eval CONPARMED Haute-Bretagne : Guaranteeing the Continuity of the Care Pathway for the Elderly Patient: Evaluation of a Territorial Approach of Clinical Pharmacy

In the context of the ageing of the French population, drug iatrogeny in the elderly is a major public health issue, responsible for approximately 7,500 deaths per year and 3.4% of hospitalizations among patients aged 65 and over.

The interest of the Medication Reconciliation (MR) in reducing medication errors and unintentional discrepancies in prescriptions at transition points in patients' medication care pathways no longer seems to be in doubt both in France and abroad.

On the other hand, the literature on the clinical impact of these drug errors (i. e. occurrence of an adverse drug event (ADE) or readmission rates) is currently limited in France and presents variable results abroad.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The medication reconciliation implementation mobilizes human resources (pharmacists, pharmacy technician, nurses...) and constitutes an investment for healthcare institutions. However, the resulting improvement in patients' health status (and the potential reduction in ADEs) could reduce their care consumption and thus reduce costs from a healthcare system perspective. We therefore propose to assess the cost-effectiveness of this care strategy.

Finally, we will study the impact of the MR deployment on existing professional organizations, both in hospital and between community healthcare professionals and hospital as well as its conditions of implementation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

443

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antrain, France, 35560
        • Hopital des Marches de Bretagne
      • Fougères, France, 35306
        • General Hospital
      • Janzé, France, 35150
        • General Hospital
      • Montfort-sur-Meu, France, 35160
        • General Hospital
      • Rennes, France, 35000
        • University Hospital
      • Saint-Méen le Grand, France, 35290
        • General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients over 65 years admitted inside one of the thirteen wards from 6 hospitals located around Rennes and Fougères, between 13/06/2019 and 13/09/2019

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • Patient > 65 years old
  • Patient hospitalized inside one of the thirteen wards in the 6 hospitals participating in the study
  • Informed consent given

Non inclusion and Exclusion Criteria :

  • Patients in palliative care
  • Persons deprived of their liberty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
MR group
Patients who benefit from a full process of medication reconciliation (entrance and discharge) before being discharged to home.

During hospitalization, the hospital pharmacist will carry out a pharmaceutical analysis for all patients included in the study, each time the prescription is changed and within a maximum of 24 hours (working days).

If necessary, in consultation with the doctor in charge of the patient, the pharmacist may also propose a pharmaceutical interview to the patient at any time during his hospitalisation (e.g. proposal for the de-prescription of benzodiazepines, Proton Pump Inhibitors, etc., according to the recommendations in force).

Control group
Patients who benefitted from a medication reconciliation at entrance only before being discharged to home.

During hospitalization, the hospital pharmacist will carry out a pharmaceutical analysis for all patients included in the study, each time the prescription is changed and within a maximum of 24 hours (working days).

If necessary, in consultation with the doctor in charge of the patient, the pharmacist may also propose a pharmaceutical interview to the patient at any time during his hospitalisation (e.g. proposal for the de-prescription of benzodiazepines, Proton Pump Inhibitors, etc., according to the recommendations in force).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse drug event-related hospital revisits
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
Rate of adverse drug event-related hospital revisits within 30 days after discharge
30 days after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General Practitioner consultation
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
Rate of General Practitioner consultation within 30 days after discharge
30 days after discharge
All-causes readmissions and/or Emergency Department visits
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
Composite rate of readmissions and/or Emergency Department visits within 30 days after discharge
30 days after discharge
All-causes readmissions and/or Emergency Department visits
Time Frame: 90 days after discharge
Composite rate of readmissions and/or Emergency Department visits within 90 days after discharge
90 days after discharge
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) at Day 30
Time Frame: 30 days after discharge
Medico-economic analysis : Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) : cost per hospitalization for Drug Adverse Event avoided and cost per all-causes hospitalization, according to a collective perspective at Day 0.
30 days after discharge
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) at Day 90
Time Frame: 90 days after discharge
Medico-economic analysis : Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) : cost per hospitalization for Drug Adverse Event avoided and cost per all-causes hospitalization, according to a collective perspective at Day 90.
90 days after discharge
Patient reported experience measures
Time Frame: 7 days after discharge
Patient reported experience measures are realized by a short phone call interview, 7 days after the patients' homecoming
7 days after discharge
Severity of Unintended Medication Discrepancies
Time Frame: At admission
Severity of Unintended Medication Discrepancies intercepted during medication reconciliation at admission
At admission
Number of Unintended Medication Discrepancies
Time Frame: At admission
Number of Unintended Medication Discrepancies intercepted during medication reconciliation at admission
At admission
Impact of the implementation of the intervention on professional organizations
Time Frame: Before and after the implementation of the intervention in the participating wards

Qualitative analysis based on :

  • First, an inventory of organizations prior to the implementation of the intervention in participating health facilities
  • Then, an assessment of the impacts of the implementation of the intervention on different aspects of professional organizations: collaborative exchanges, multi-professional information sharing, division of labour, exchanges with city practitioners, learning effects, evolution of professional practices.
Before and after the implementation of the intervention in the participating wards

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Benoit HUE, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Rennes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 13, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35RC19_30022
  • 2019-A00455-52 (OTHER: Id-RCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Medication Reconciliation at Discharge

Clinical Trials on medication reconciliation

Subscribe