Empagliflozin Impact on Hemodynamics in Patients With Heart Failure (EMBRACE-HF)

November 10, 2021 updated by: Saint Luke's Health System

Empagliflozin Evaluation by Measuring Impact on Hemodynamics in Patients With Heart Failure

The primary purpose of this trial is to evaluate the impact of empagliflozin, as compared with placebo, on hemodynamic parameters (pulmonary artery diastolic pressure) in patients with heart failure (reduced or preserved ejection fraction, ischemic or non-ischemic etiology) who already have a CardioMEMs device (a wireless hemodynamic monitoring system) implanted for non-study related clinical reasons.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to explore the effects of once-daily empagliflozin 10 mg on hemodynamic parameters (pulmonary artery pressures) in patients with heart failure (reduced or preserved ejection fraction, ischemic or non-ischemic etiology) who already have a CardioMEMs device implanted for non-study related clinical reasons.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • University of Southern California
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32256
        • First Coast Cardiovascular Institute
    • Illinois
      • Evanston, Illinois, United States, 60201
        • NorthShore University Health System Research Institute
    • Minnesota
      • Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States, 56303
        • CentraCare Heart and Vascular Center
    • New York
      • Roslyn, New York, United States, 11576
        • St. Francis Hospital
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • South Dakota
      • Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States, 57104
        • Sanford Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • Austin Heart Clinical Research
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Sentara Cardiovascular Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 115 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Established diagnosis of heart failure (for at least 16 weeks prior to the screening visit) with either preserved (LVEF>40%) or reduced systolic function (LVEF≤40%), due to either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology, documented by an imaging modality (echocardiography, nuclear imaging, LV angiography, magnetic resonance imaging) within the past 24 months.
  2. No major change in diuretic management for 48 hours prior to screening visit or 48 hours prior to randomization visit (major change defined by doubling of diuretic dose or addition of another diuretic medication)
  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II, III or IV heart failure symptoms at the screening and randomization visit
  4. Presence of previously (≥ 2 weeks prior to screening visit) implanted CardioMEMs pulmonary artery pressure monitor for a clinical indication unrelated to the study.
  5. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure ≥ 12 mmHg at the time of the screening visit (last measurement available prior to the screening visit).
  6. Ability to provide informed consent prior to initiating screening visit procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Decompensated heart failure (hospitalization for heart failure within the 2 weeks prior to screening) or between screening and randomization
  2. History of type 1 diabetes
  3. Major change in diuretic management during 48 hours prior to screening visit or 48 hours prior to randomization visit. (major change defined by doubling of diuretic dose or addition of another diuretic medications)
  4. Significant variability in baseline pulmonary artery diastolic pressures during screening period. Defined as changes greater than +/- 6 mmHg from average pulmonary artery diastolic pressure during week 1 of the screening phase and average pulmonary artery diastolic pressure during week 2 of the screening phase for those patients with an average baseline pulmonary artery diastolic pressure during week 1 of the screening phase of <30 mmHg. If the average baseline pulmonary artery diastolic pressure during week 1 of the screening phase is ≥30 mmHg, then ≥20% relative change in average pulmonary diastolic pressure between week 1 and week 2 of the screening phase will be used to define significant variability.
  5. Initiation of hydralazine, long-acting nitrates, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) , angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) or valsartan/sacubitril in the prior 4 weeks prior to screening
  6. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the screening visit
  7. Admission for an acute coronary syndrome (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina), percutaneous coronary intervention, or cardiac surgery within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
  8. Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device within the previous 90 days.
  9. Implantation of the CardioMEMs device within the past 2 weeks.
  10. Planned cardiovascular revascularization (percutaneous intervention or surgical) or major cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement, ventricular assist device, cardiac transplantation, or any other surgery requiring thoracotomy), or planned implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device within the 90 days after the screening visit.
  11. Participation in any interventional clinical trial (with an investigational drug or device) that is not an observational registry within the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
  12. History of hypersensitivity to empagliflozin
  13. For women of child-bearing potential: Current or planned pregnancy or currently lactating
  14. Life expectancy <1 year at the screening visit
  15. Patients who are volume depleted based upon physical examination at the time of the screening or randomization visit
  16. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure < 12 mmHg at the time of the screening visit (average of last four measurements available prior to the screening visit).
  17. Patients currently being treated with any SGLT-2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin, canagliflozin, empagliflozin) or having received treatment with any SGLT-2 inhibitor within the 8 weeks prior to the screening visit
  18. Average supine systolic BP <90 mmHg at the screening or randomization visit
  19. Current documented history of bladder cancer
  20. Active Gross Hematuria
  21. Heart failure due to restrictive cardiomyopathy, active myocarditis, constrictive pericarditis, severe stenotic valve disease, and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM).
  22. History of heart transplant.
  23. Patients on heart transplant list as 1a and 1b status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Empagliflozin
Empagliflozin 10 mg tab, once daily, for 12 weeks
Empagliflozin 10 mg Tab
Other Names:
  • Jardiance
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Empagliflozin matching placebo oral tablet, once daily for 12 weeks
Empagliflozin matching placebo
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Defined as Average of Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure Measurements Between Weeks 8-12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline to average between Weeks 8-12
Change in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure from baseline to end of treatment period (defined as average of pulmonary artery diastolic pressure measurements between weeks 8-12) between empagliflozin and placebo
Baseline to average between Weeks 8-12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Artery Diastolic Pressure at Each Interim Timepoint (Wks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change from baseline in pulmonary artery diastolic pressure at each interim timepoint (wks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11,12) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Week 12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change in pulmonary artery systolic pressure from baseline to end of treatment period (week 12) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure at Each Interim Time Point (Wks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change from baseline in pulmonary artery systolic pressure at each interim time point (wks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11,12) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure From Baseline to End of Treatment Period (Week 12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Change in mean pulmonary artery pressure from baseline to end of treatment period (week 12) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure at Each Interim Time Point (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change from baseline in mean pulmonary artery pressure at each interim time point (weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Weeks 1-12
Change in Heart Failure Related Quality of Life, Using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) From Baseline to Follow-up (Defines as Average of Measurements at 6 and 12 Weeks) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific health status instrument composed of 23 items that quantifies the domains of physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social limitation and quality of life from heart failure. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. For the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score KCCQ-OS, a small but clinically meaningful change is considered to be ≥ 5 points.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of Patients With a ≥ 5 Point Increase From Baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) at Either 6 Weeks or 12 Weeks of Follow-up Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific health status instrument composed of 23 items that quantifies the domains of physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social limitation and quality of life from heart failure. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. For the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score KCCQ-OS, a small but clinically meaningful change is considered to be ≥ 5 points.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in 6 Minute Walk Test From Baseline to Follow-up (Defined as Average of Measurements at 6 and 12 Weeks) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in 6 minute walk test from baseline to follow-up (defined as average of measurements at 6 and 12 weeks) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) From Baseline to Follow-up (Defined as Average of Measurements at 6 and 12 Weeks) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to follow-up (defined as average of measurements at 6 and 12 weeks) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) From Baseline to Follow-up (Defined as Average of Measurements at 6 and 12 Weeks) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) from baseline to follow-up (defined as average of measurements at 6 and 12 weeks) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of Patients With a ≥ 20% Decrease From Baseline in N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) at Either 6 Weeks or 12 Weeks of Follow-up Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of patients with a ≥ 20% decrease from baseline in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at either 6 weeks or 12 weeks of follow-up between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of Patients With a ≥ 20% Decrease From Baseline in Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) at Either 6 Weeks or 12 Weeks of Follow-up Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of patients with a ≥ 20% decrease from baseline in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) at either 6 weeks or 12 weeks of follow-up between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of Patients With Both a ≥ 5 Point Increase From Baseline in KCCQ-OS and a ≥ 20% Decrease From Baseline in NT-proBNP at Either 6 Weeks or 12 Weeks of Follow-up Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Proportion of patients with both a ≥ 5 point increase from baseline in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score (KCCQ-OS) and a ≥ 20% decrease from baseline in N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) at either 6 weeks or 12 weeks of follow-up between empagliflozin and placebo. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a disease-specific health status instrument composed of 23 items that quantifies the domains of physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social limitation and quality of life from heart failure. Scores range from 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. For the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score KCCQ-OS, a small but clinically meaningful change is considered to be ≥ 5 points.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Number of Participants With Diuretic Medication Adjustments During the Treatment Period Between Empagliflozin and Placebo
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
Number of Participants with Diuretic Medication Adjustments During the Treatment Period Between Empagliflozin and Placebo
Baseline to Week 12
Change in Hemoglobin A1c From Baseline to Follow-up (Defined as Average of Measurements at 6 and 12 Weeks) Between Empagliflozin and Placebo.
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12
Change in Hemoglobin A1c from baseline to follow-up (defined as average of measurements at 6 and 12 weeks) between empagliflozin and placebo.
Baseline to Week 6 and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mikhail Kosiborod, MD, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Empagliflozin 10 mg Tab

Subscribe