Comprehensive Nutritional Geriatric Assessments in Identifying Malnutrition in Older Cancer Participants

December 8, 2023 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Malnutrition in Older Cancer Patients

This trial studies how well comprehensive nutritional geriatric assessments work in identifying malnutrition in older cancer participants. Comprehensive nutritional geriatric assessments may help doctors learn about ways to check for malnutrition (loss of weight/appetite that may result in health problems) that is due to cancer or cancer treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To evaluate whether nutritional status, as determined by each of 4 screening tools (Mini Nutritional Assessment [MNA], weight loss, body mass index [BMI], and lean muscle mass), correlates with 6-month and 12-month mortality in older cancer patients after geriatric assessment, after adjusting for covariates.

II. To evaluate whether nutritional status, as determined by each of by 4 screening tools (MNA, weight loss, BMI, and lean muscle mass) correlates with 6-month and 12-month unplanned hospitalization in older cancer patients who undergo geriatric assessment, after adjusting for covariates.

III. To evaluate whether nutritional status, as determined by each of 4 screening tools (MNA, weight loss, BMI, and lean muscle mass) correlates with 6-month and 12-month hospital readmissions in older cancer patients who undergo geriatric assessment, after adjusting for covariates.

OUTLINE:

Participants undergo nutritional geriatric assessment over 15 minutes in person or on the phone every 3 months for 12 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with hematologic and solid tumor cancers, undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment by a geriatrician

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • With hematologic and solid tumor cancers.
  • Undergo a comprehensive geriatric assessment by a geriatrician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to sign consent form.
  • Life expectancy under 6 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Nutritional geriatric assessment
Participants undergo nutritional geriatric assessment over 15 minutes in person or on the phone every 3 months for 12 months.
Undergo nutritional geriatric assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: At 6 months
The association between nutrition status and mortality (6-month and 1-year mortality since geriatric assessment) will be assessed by logistic regression analysis, considering mortality as a response variable. Univariate logistic regression analysis will be used to estimate the crude odds ratio, and multivariable logistic regression will be used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for potential confounder variables, such as age, race, cancer type, cancer stage, co-morbidity, cognitive status), and frailty. ROC curve to predict 6-month and 1-year mortality will be constructed for nutritional status, as determined by each screening tool. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be obtained for each screening tool.
At 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: At 1 year
The association between nutrition status and mortality (6-month and 1-year mortality since geriatric assessment) will be assessed by logistic regression analysis, considering mortality as a response variable. Univariate logistic regression analysis will be used to estimate the crude odds ratio, and multivariable logistic regression will be used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for potential confounder variables, such as age, race, cancer type, cancer stage, co-morbidity, cognitive status), and frailty. ROC curve to predict 6-month and 1-year mortality will be constructed for nutritional status, as determined by each screening tool. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be obtained for each screening tool.
At 1 year
Unplanned hospitalization rate
Time Frame: At 6 months and 1 year
The associations between nutrition status and unplanned hospitalization will be assessed by logistic regression analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis will be used to get the crude odds ratio, and multivariable logistic regression will be used to get the adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for potential confounder variables, such as age, race, cancer type, cancer stage, co-morbidity, cognitive status, and frailty. Patients who died before 6 months or 1 year from geriatric test will be considered as having unplanned 6-month or 1-year hospitalization. ROC curve to predict each of secondary outcomes will be constructed for nutritional status, as determined by each screening tool. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be obtained for each screening tool. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize data. Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used for the comparison in numeric variables.
At 6 months and 1 year
Hospital readmission rate
Time Frame: At 6 months
The associations between nutrition status and hospital readmissions will be assessed by logistic regression analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis will be used to get the crude odds ratio, and multivariable logistic regression will be used to get the adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for potential confounder variables, such as age, race, cancer type, cancer stage, co-morbidity, cognitive status, and frailty. Patients who died before 6 months or 1 year from geriatric test will be considered as having unplanned 6-month or 1-year hospitalization. ROC curve to predict each of secondary outcomes will be constructed for nutritional status, as determined by each screening tool. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be obtained for each screening tool. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize data. Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used for the comparison in numeric variables.
At 6 months
Re-hospitalization rate
Time Frame: At 1 year
The associations between nutrition status and hospital readmissions will be assessed by logistic regression analysis. Univariate logistic regression analysis will be used to get the crude odds ratio, and multivariable logistic regression will be used to get the adjusted odds ratio, after controlling for potential confounder variables, such as age, race, cancer type, cancer stage, co-morbidity, cognitive status, and frailty. Patients who died before 6 months or 1 year from geriatric test will be considered as having unplanned 6-month or 1-year hospitalization. ROC curve to predict each of secondary outcomes will be constructed for nutritional status, as determined by each screening tool. The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, and specificity and 95% confidence intervals will be obtained for each screening tool. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize data. Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be used for the comparison in numeric variables.
At 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mehnaz Shafi, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

January 30, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-0705 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • NCI-2018-01280 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

3
Subscribe