HEalthy Aging Team Supported Home-care Services (HEAT-YASAM) (HEAT-YASAM)

November 30, 2023 updated by: Bilal Katipoglu, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital

Does Healthy Aging Team-supported Home-care Services Pilot Program Reduce ED Visits? A Prospective before-and After-intervention Study

Depending on the YASAM project which was established to home-visit evaluate community-dwelling older adults (80 years of age and over), we aimed to determine the prevalence (prevalence) of geriatric syndromes (dependence, frailty, malnutrition, depression, dementia, comorbidity burden, polypharmacy) in these individuals and to determine possible changes in the follow-up of the patients during the 2-year follow-up period. (HEAVEN trial)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Individuals over the age of 80 who will participate in the YASAM project will first be informed by phone and their appointments will be made. Subsequently, a home visit will be conducted after obtaining verbal and written consent from the patients and their relatives.

The chronic diseases and medications of the patients will be questioned and controlled from the electronic data set. To determine the level of frailty and dependency, the Katz, Lawton-Brody, and Clinical Frailty scales will be filled in, respectively, by the previously trained health personnel, by interviewing their relatives. Mini-Cog, Mini Mental Status Assessment, Mini Nutrition Assessment, and Geriatric Depression (Yesavage) Assessments will be planned. According to dependency status, individuals will be re-evaluated in the 1st or 2nd month. If the patients are fully independent, control follow-up is planned in the 3rd month. Written file records will be created by obtaining the consent of the patients and their relatives at each patient visit. Each team will be responsible for the follow-up of 300 patients. It is planned to include a total of 6000 individuals in the first phase, which is carried out in 20 centers throughout the province of Balıkesir and whose coordination center is Atatürk city hospital. In the follow-ups, it is planned to include the whole cohort consisting of 40 thousand individuals over the age of 80, by increasing the number of teams. The short-term results of the patient's follow-up (1st, 3rd, and 6th-month results), changes in mortality, addiction, frailty level, and changes in nutrition and cognitive functions within the specified period will be evaluated as short-term results. It is aimed to record the long-term outcomes (1st and 2nd year) of the same variables.

Since the whole population will be included in the study, sample size and power analysis were not performed.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • None Selected
      • Balikesir, None Selected, Turkey, 10100
        • Balikesir Ataturk City Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

It is planned to include a total of 6000 individuals in the first phase, which is carried out in 20 centers throughout the province of Balıkesir (rural and central area) and whose coordination center is Balikesir Atatürk City Hospital. In the follow-ups, it is planned to include the whole cohort consisting of individuals over the age of 40 thousand 80, by increasing the number of teams.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 80 years and over older adults
  • individuals giving verbal and written consent for the YASAM project

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <80 years older adults
  • those who did not give verbal and written consent for the YASAM project

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short term Healthy Aging status (mortality)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the national electronic database.
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes dependency )
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test Katz scales the 1 is minimum and 6 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome, higher scores mean a better outcome for dependency)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in frailty level)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Fraility via Clinical fraility scales the 1 is minimum and 9 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome).
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in nutrition)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (MNA scale for nutritional status the 0 is minimum and 14 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in cognitive functions)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (cognitive functions with MMSE scale, the 0 is minimum and 30 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in mood)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test ( Yesavage for Depression status the 0 is minimum and 15 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome)
1-,3-,6- month
Short term Healthy Aging status (changes in mobility status)
Time Frame: 1-,3-,6- month
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Chair stand test higher scores (>13,5 seconds) means a worse outcome for mobility status).
1-,3-,6- month
Long term Healthy Aging status (mortality)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the national electronic database.
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes dependency )
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test Katz scales the 1 is minimum and 6 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome, higher scores mean a better outcome for dependency)
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in frailty level)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Fraility via Clinical fraility scales the 1 is minimum and 9 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome.)
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in nutrition)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (MNA scale for nutritional status the 1 is minimum and 14 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in cognitive functions)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (cognitive functions with MMSE scale, the 0 is minimum and 30 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a better outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in mood)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test ( Yesavage scale for Depression status the 0 is minimum and 15 is maximum value for scale, and higher scores mean a worse outcome).
1- and 2- year
Long term Healthy Aging status (changes in mobility status)
Time Frame: 1- and 2- year
Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Outcomes were evaluated according to the specific test (Chair stand test higher scores (>13,5 seconds) means a worse outcome for mobility status).
1- and 2- year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Bilal Katipoglu, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-3-24

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Subscribe