Comparison of Hyperbaric Prilocaine With Chloroprocaine for Intrathecal Anaesthesia in Day Case Knee Arthroscopy

November 15, 2019 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Saint Pierre
This study compares intrathecal 1% plain chloroprocaine with intrathecal 2% hyperbaric prilocaine for patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy in terms of efficacy and side effects

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium, 1420
        • Braine-l'Alleud Hospital
      • Brussels Capital Region, Belgium, 1000
        • Chu Saint-Pierre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status (ASA) ≤ III
  • Age 18-80 year
  • Height between 160 and 185 cm
  • Signed informed consent obtained prior to any study specific assessments and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac pathology (such as Heart failure, Aortic stenosis)
  • Coagulation disorders (INR>1.3, platelet < 80 000/mm3)
  • Known allergy to local anaesthetics
  • Disagreement of the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine
The 50 mg dose of isobaric 2-chloroprocaine will be administered to patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy
intrathecal injection of 50 mg isobaric 2-Chloroprocaine
Other Names:
  • Ampres
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hyperbaric prilocaine 2%
The dose of 50 mg of Hyperbaric prilocaine 2% will be administered to patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy
intrathecal injection of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2%
Other Names:
  • Tachipri

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of sensory block
Time Frame: Until complete release of sensory block
Total duration of sensory block is the interval time between the end of intrathecal injection and the complete recovery of sensory block
Until complete release of sensory block

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Onset time of sensory block
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
The levels of sensory block will be determined at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after intrathecal injection. The levels of sensory block will be assessed as loss of sensation to pin-prick and cold.
up to 30 minutes
Onset time of motor block
Time Frame: up to 30 minutes
The levels of motor block will be determined at 5, 10, 20 and 30 minutes after intrathecal injection. The levels of motor block will be assessed by using the Bromage Scale (0=no motor block; 1=hip blocked; 2=hip and knee blocked; 3=hip, knee, and ankle blocked).
up to 30 minutes
Duration of motor block
Time Frame: Until complete regression of motor block
Total duration of motor block is the interval time between the end of intrathecal injection and the complete recovery of motor block
Until complete regression of motor block
Pain assessed by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Pain levels will be determined at the inflation of tourniquet, at the incision and every 10 minutes in the PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit). Visual Analog pain score (scale = 0 no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable).
up to 24 hours
Side-effects (hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention)
Time Frame: up to 24 hours
Assessed during and after intervention
up to 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Emmanuel Guntz, MD, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Braine-l'Alleud Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Panayota Kapessidou, MD,PhD, University Hospital Saint-Pierre (CHU Saint-Pierre), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 18, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Isobaric 2-chloroprocaine

3
Subscribe