- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03039036
Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Early Amniotomy Versus Delayed Amniotomy Following Foley Catheter Ripening in Nulliparous Labor Induction
Amniotomy (breaking the bag of water) is commonly used in the induction of labor. However, the timing is highly variable. The purpose of this study is to determine if first time mothers undergoing induction of labor with a Foley catheter experience a decrease in their labor time when undergoing early amniotomy (breaking the bag of water within 1 hour of Foley catheter removal) than when undergoing delayed amniotomy (breaking the bag of water at least 4 hours after Foley catheter removal). Other aims include the relationship between timing of amniotomy and cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage, intrauterine infection, neonatal Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes, neonatal need for intensive care.
The investigators hypothesize that induction of labor with Foley catheters followed by early amniotomy will result in a decreased duration of labor compared to those who undergo delayed amniotomy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This randomized clinical trial of consenting nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor with a Foley catheter seeks to determine whether use of early amniotomy (defined as amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter removal) improves obstetrical outcomes when compared with delayed amniotomy (defined as amniotomy at least 4 hours following Foley catheter removal).
This project will include 110 women recruited from the obstetrical service at Prentice Women's Hospital. Women will be included if they are at least 37 weeks gestation, have a singleton pregnancy, have intact membranes and are undergoing an induction of labor using a Foley catheter. Following removal of Foley catheter, women will be assessed for safety of amniotomy and if appropriate, randomized to either early amniotomy or delayed amniotomy.
Women will be randomized with equal probability to the intervention group using block randomization stratified by use of Foley catheter alone or Foley catheter-misoprostol use.
Women in the early amniotomy group will undergo amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter removal. Women in the delayed amniotomy group will undergo amniotomy at least 4 hours following Foley removal. The remainder of labor management will be at the discretion of each woman's obstetric provider.
Prior to discharge from the hospital, baseline demographic and clinical data will be obtained via chart review
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Prentice Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to provide informed consent
- English speaking
- Women age 18 years old or greater
- Nulliparous
- Pregnant with a singleton gestation that is greater than or equal to 37 weeks
- Undergoing induction of labor with Foley catheter
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women not meeting above criteria
- Fetus in non-cephalic position
- Intrauterine fetal demise
- Fetus with major anomalies
- HIV, hepatitis B or C infection
- Planned use of oxytocin during the Foley catheter ripening
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Early Amniotomy
Patients undergoing induction of labor with foley catheter, with or without concurrent use of misoprostol, will undergo amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter removal.
|
Artificially rupturing membranes
Foley catheter device is commonly used for cervical ripening during labor induction.
It is used independently or in combination with pharmacologic augmentation.
It is inserted in the cervix and the balloon is then inflated with 60 cc of saline.
It is removed when either 1. it falls out under gentile traction during labor checks or 2. it is de-inflated at 12 hours after placement.
If at the time of de-inflation at 12 hours, the desired affect has not been achieved, the provider may choose to place another foley balloon or use an alternative method of induction (misoprostol).
This is an eligibility criteria and only patients who are undergoing induction with a Foley Catheter will be approached for enrollment.
Misoprostol is a medication that is commonly used for cervical ripening during labor induction.
It is commonly used independently or in combination with mechanical methods, such as a foley catheter.
The commonly used dose during term labor induction is 25 mcg.
Use of this medication will be decided by the provider.
|
|
Active Comparator: Delayed Amniotomy
Patients undergoing induction of labor with foley catheter, with or without concurrent use of misoprostol, will undergo amniotomy no sooner than 4 hours following removal of Foley catheter.
|
Artificially rupturing membranes
Foley catheter device is commonly used for cervical ripening during labor induction.
It is used independently or in combination with pharmacologic augmentation.
It is inserted in the cervix and the balloon is then inflated with 60 cc of saline.
It is removed when either 1. it falls out under gentile traction during labor checks or 2. it is de-inflated at 12 hours after placement.
If at the time of de-inflation at 12 hours, the desired affect has not been achieved, the provider may choose to place another foley balloon or use an alternative method of induction (misoprostol).
This is an eligibility criteria and only patients who are undergoing induction with a Foley Catheter will be approached for enrollment.
Misoprostol is a medication that is commonly used for cervical ripening during labor induction.
It is commonly used independently or in combination with mechanical methods, such as a foley catheter.
The commonly used dose during term labor induction is 25 mcg.
Use of this medication will be decided by the provider.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time interval from Foley catheter removal to delivery
Time Frame: Number of hours from removal of Foley catheter to delivery of neonate; up to 72 hours.
|
Hours
|
Number of hours from removal of Foley catheter to delivery of neonate; up to 72 hours.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cesarean delivery
Time Frame: At time of delivery
|
binary; yes/no
|
At time of delivery
|
|
Chorioamnionitis
Time Frame: From time of admission to Labor and Delivery unit to delivery of neonate; up to 72 hours
|
Maternal Temperature of >/= 39 degrees Celsius or >/= 38 degrees Celsius on two occasions greater than 30 minutes apart and at least one of the following: Fetal tachycardia (defined as sustained (>10 min) fetal heart rate >160), White Bood Cell Count >15, purulent fluid from cervical os, or receipt of antibiotics and diagnosis written in the chart
|
From time of admission to Labor and Delivery unit to delivery of neonate; up to 72 hours
|
|
Postpartum Fever
Time Frame: From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
Temperature >/= 38 degrees celsius on 2 separate occasions greater than 6 hours apart
|
From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
Wound infection
Time Frame: From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
Cellulitis or erythema and induration around the incision and purulent discharge from the incision site with or without fever
|
From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
Endometritis
Time Frame: From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
fundal tenderness and fever that required treatment with antibiotics
|
From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
5 minute Apgar Score less than 7 out of 10
Time Frame: 5 minutes following delivery; 5 minutes of neonatal life.
|
Neonatal Apgar scores consist of measurements of neonatal skin color, respiratory rate, heart rate, muscle tone, and irritability.
Each parameter is given a score of 0, 1 or 2 based on standardized parameters.
It is standard to perform this on all neonates at 1 minute and 5 minutes of life.
Apgar scores are performed and calculated by nursing staff or members of the pediatric team.
For this outcome, we are interested in scores less than 7 out of 10 at 5 minutes of life.
|
5 minutes following delivery; 5 minutes of neonatal life.
|
|
Neonatal intensive care unit admission
Time Frame: From time of delivery to hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
Admission to the neonatal intensive care unit for greater than 24 hours
|
From time of delivery to hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
Length of Labor
Time Frame: Time from placement of Foley catheter to time of delivery of neonate; up to 5 days
|
hours
|
Time from placement of Foley catheter to time of delivery of neonate; up to 5 days
|
|
Suspected or confirmed neonatal sepsis
Time Frame: From time of delivery to hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
As clinical suspected by the neonatology team or with positive cultures
|
From time of delivery to hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
Postpartum hemorrhage
Time Frame: From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
Delivery estimated blood loss of > 500 cc for vaginal delivery or > 1000 cc for cesarean delivery
|
From time of delivery to time of hospital discharge; up to 6 weeks
|
|
Delivery time less than 24 hours
Time Frame: From time of placement of Foley catheter to time of delivery of neonate; within 24 hours.
|
binary; yes/no
|
From time of placement of Foley catheter to time of delivery of neonate; within 24 hours.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Emily Miller, MD, Northwestern University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563.
- Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778.
- Levy R, Ferber A, Ben-Arie A, Paz B, Hazan Y, Blickstein I, Hagay ZJ. A randomised comparison of early versus late amniotomy following cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. BJOG. 2002 Feb;109(2):168-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01137.x.
- Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2.
- Osterman MJ, Martin JA. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Jun;(155):1-8.
- Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):917-22. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00794-8.
- Garcia-Simon R, Montanes A, Clemente J, Del Pino MD, Romero MA, Fabre E, Oros D. Economic implications of labor induction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Apr;133(1):112-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.08.022. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
- Carbone JF, Tuuli MG, Fogertey PJ, Roehl KA, Macones GA. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;121(2 Pt 1):247-252. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827e5dca.
- Smyth RM, Markham C, Dowswell T. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 18;(6):CD006167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006167.pub4.
- Gelber S, Sciscione A. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Sep;49(3):642-57. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200609000-00022.
- Mizrachi Y, Levy M, Bar J, Kovo M. Induction of labor in nulliparous women with unfavorable cervix: a comparison of Foley catheter and vaginal prostaglandin E2. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Oct;294(4):725-30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4026-9. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00204292
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Induction
-
Aalto UniversityHelsinki University Central Hospital; Tampere University Hospital; Jyväskylä...Not yet recruitingInduction of Labor | Cervical Ripening | Cervical Ripening and Induction of LaborFinland
-
Aalto UniversityUniversity of Minnesota; University of Mississippi Medical CenterNot yet recruitingCervical Ripening | Induction of Birth | Balloon Catheter for Labor Induction | Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterNot yet recruitingLabor Induction
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Sorlandet Hospital HFCompleted
-
Mednax Center for Research, Education, Quality...Completed
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalUnknown
-
University of ArizonaUnknownLabor InductionUnited States
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompleted
Clinical Trials on Amniotomy
-
University of PennsylvaniaWithdrawn
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedLabor Induction | Preterm PregnancyUnited States
-
University Tunis El ManarCompletedLabor, Induced | AmniotomyTunisia
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCompletedLabor Induction | Early AmniotomyUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedProlonged Labor
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
Assuta Ashdod HospitalRambam Health Care Campus; Wolfson Medical Center; The Baruch Padeh Medical Center...TerminatedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornIsrael
-
Menoufia UniversityCompleted
-
Zeynep Kamil Maternity and Pediatric Research and...CompletedInduced Vaginal DeliveryTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown