Trigen InterTAN vs Sliding Hip Screw RCT

Functional Advantages of TRIGEN™ INTERTAN™ Over Sliding Hip Screw in Subjects With Trochanteric Hip Fracture: A Randomised Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the Trigen InterTAN Intramedullary nail to Sliding Hip Screws in AO/OTA 31-A1 and A2 intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Hip Fractures
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Trigen Intertan; Other: Post-Surgery Follow Up; Device: Sliding Hip Screw

Detailed Description

A multicentre, randomised controlled trial, conducted in the UK will recruit 180 subjects, randomised to receive either the Trigen InterTAN Nail or the Sliding Hip Screw.

Subjects presenting at participating hospitals with AO/OTA 31-A1 or A2 fractures will be assessed against the eligibility criteria and approached for Informed Consent.

Subjects who are considered eligible and who have provided Informed Consent will be randomised using iDataFax to one of the two treatment options.

Subjects will be operated on according to standard procedure and the Instructions for Use.

A daily inpatient assessment will record the subjects use of opioid pain medication.

Subjects will be assessed at the time of discharge to record their residential and ambulatory status, Functional Independence Measure, Get Up and Go Test and opioid usage.

At 8 weeks and 12 weeks post surgery, subjects will be contacted by telephone to confirm their residential and ambulatory status, Functional Independence Measure, modified Harris Hip Score and Euroqol-5D.

At 6 months post surgery, subjects will attend an outpatient visit to have a follow up radiograph, Get Up and Go Test, residential and ambulatory status, Functional Independence Measure, modified Harris Hip Score and Euroqol-5D.

At 12 months post surgery, subjects will be contacted by telephone to confirm their residential and ambulatory status, Functional Independence Measure, modified Harris Hip Score and Euroqol-5D.

Adverse events, device deficiencies and reoperations will be recorded as and when they occur throughout the study.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 34
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Exeter, United Kingdom
    • Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital
  • Gloucester, United Kingdom
    • Gloucestershire Royal Hospital
  • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L7 8XP
    • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
  • Plymouth, United Kingdom
    • Derriford Hospital
  • Truro, United Kingdom
    • Royal Cornwall Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• has closed trochanteric hip fracture (AO/OTA 31-A1 or A2) requiring treatment with internal fixation
• has injury due to low energy trauma
• is independently ambulatory in living environment prior to injury (walking aids permitted)
• is >60 years of age
• is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits at the investigational site and to complete study procedures and questionnaires
• has consented to participate in the study by signing the Ethics Committee (EC) approved ICF
• has definitive fracture fixation <72h from admission

Exclusion Criteria:

• has any additional injury or disability affecting mobility or affecting use of walking aids
• has a pathological fracture (excluding osteoporotic fracture)
• has an existing implant in study hip
• has diagnosis of an immunosuppressive disorder
• has an active infection, treated or untreated, systemic or at the site of the - has a condition that may interfere with the outcome of the study, including but not limited to: Paget's disease, Charcot's disease, vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, uncontrolled diabetes, renal insufficiency or neuromuscular disease
• has a BMI >40
• has an inadequate bone stock to support the device which would make the procedure unjustifiable, including but not limited to: severe osteopenia/osteoporosis or family history of severe osteoporosis/osteopenia
• is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the course of the study
• is a prisoner or is facing impending incarceration
• in the opinion of the PI, has an emotional or neurological condition that would interfere with their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, mental retardation, and drug or alcohol abuse
• is entered in another investigational drug, biologic, or device study or has been treated with an investigational product in the past 30 days
• is known to be at risk for lost to follow-up, or failure to return for scheduled visits

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Other: Trigen Intertan; Unique integrated interlocking screw and trapezoidal nail shape; Resistance to femoral head rotation and cut-out; Active compression through linear motion without rotation; Single subtrochanteric lag screw option for stable fractures below lesser trochanter; Preloaded cannulated set screw converts construct to fixed angle device; Small proximal diameter of the nail promotes preservation of the lateral wall of the greater trochanter and gluteus medius tendon; Clothespin tip for stress modulation in femoral shaft; Potential for improved patient mobility and recovery Manufactured by Smith & Nephew Inc., 1450 Brooks Road, Memphis, TN 38116, U.S.A. Interventions: Randomisation to either Trigen Intertan or Sliding Hip Screw, Post-Surgery Follow Up	Device: Trigen Intertan; While both the Trigen InterTAN and Sliding Hip Screw are marketed and demonstrated to be suitable for treatment of the study indication, the randomisation is considered an intervention as it may be contrary to the treatment chosen by the surgeon were the patient not a study subject.; Other: Post-Surgery Follow Up; The current clinical trend is for minimal follow up post-surgery, unless indicated by complications. The study protocol indicated that follow up telephone visits are to be performed at 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months post-surgery and an outpatient follow up visit at 6 months post-surgery. While most outcome measures are conducted via questionnaire, the increase in follow up means that subjects may be exposed to increased ionising radiation.
Other: Sliding Hip Screw; SHS is a generic term for a group of devices used for internal fixation of trochanteric hip fractures. Also known as Compression Hip Screw or Dynamic Hip Screw. All devices feature a lag screw inserted into the femoral neck and a side plate held in place by cortical screws inserted into the proximal femoral shaft. Therapeutic effect is achieved by guided collapse, where the lag screw can slide in the barrel of the side plate which compresses the fracture as the patient begins to weight-bear. Participating sites may use whichever brand of SHS is currently in use. Interventions: Randomisation to either Trigen Intertan or Sliding Hip Screw, Post-Surgery Follow Up	Other: Post-Surgery Follow Up; The current clinical trend is for minimal follow up post-surgery, unless indicated by complications. The study protocol indicated that follow up telephone visits are to be performed at 8 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months post-surgery and an outpatient follow up visit at 6 months post-surgery. While most outcome measures are conducted via questionnaire, the increase in follow up means that subjects may be exposed to increased ionising radiation.; Device: Sliding Hip Screw; Sliding Hip Screw

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional Independence Measure (motor portion)	The FIM instrument is a basic indicator of severity of disability. Comprises 18 items assessed against a seven point ordinal scale, where the higher the score for an item, the more independently the patient is able to perform the tasks assessed by that item. Total scores range from 18 to 126. The items are divided into 13 Motor items and 5 Cognitive Items. The rating scale designates major graduations in behaviour from dependence to independence. The scale provides for the classification of individuals by their ability to carry out an activity independently, versus their need for assistance from another person or a device. If help is needed the scale assesses the degree of that need. Patient reported outcome.	8 weeks post-surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Functional Independence Measure	The FIM instrument is a basic indicator of severity of disability. Comprises 18 items assessed against a seven point ordinal scale, where the higher the score for an item, the more independently the patient is able to perform the tasks assessed by that item. Total scores range from 18 to 126. The items are divided into 13 Motor items and 5 Cognitive Items. The rating scale designates major graduations in behaviour from dependence to independence. The scale provides for the classification of individuals by their ability to carry out an activity independently, versus their need for assistance from another person or a device. If help is needed the scale assesses the degree of that need. Patient reported outcome.	12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Get Up and Go Test	Requires the study subject to; Sit comfortably in a straight-backed chair; Rise from the chair; Stand still momentarily; Walk a short distance (approximately 3 metres); Turn around; Walk back to the chair; Turn around; Sit down in the chair Movements are observed for any deviation from a confident, normal performance and recorded as; 1. Normal 2. Very slightly abnormal 3. Mildly abnormal 4. Moderately abnormal 5. Severely abnormal Subjects will be scored as above and whether any mobility aids were required. The GUG Test will be supervised and recorded by study staff.	Discharge (estimated 2 weeks post-surgery) and 6 months post-surgery
Residential Status Questionnaire	Pre-operatively it will be recorded what the subjects' residential status was prior to injury, whether they were; living at home independently; living at home with additional care; living in sheltered housing; living in a care institution At discharge and thereafter it will be recorded which of these living environments the subject is discharged to with the additional option of;; NHS rehabilitation	Pre-Op (Day prior to or day of surgery), Discharge (estimated 2 weeks post-surgery), 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Ambulatory Status Questionnaire	Pre-operatively it will be recorded what the subjects' ambulatory status was prior to injury inside and outside their living environment, whether they were; Walking unaided; Walking with aids1 stick2 sticksFrameWheelchair (Note: Wheelchair use inside the living environment pre-operatively is an exclusion criterion. Wheelchair use outside the living environment is permitted if the subject is walking unaided or with stick(s) or frame inside the home) Ambulatory status will be recorded at discharge and at all Follow-Up timepoints thereafter.	Pre-Op (Day prior to or day of surgery), Discharge (estimated 2 weeks post-surgery), 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Radiographic Assessment (calculation of medialisation, shortening and tip-apex distance)	A pre-operative low centred anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and lateral hip X-ray radiograph will be taken for diagnostic purposes. If a deformity is noted, a full length AP and lateral femur X-ray will be conducted in addition. The post-operative low centre AP pelvis and lateral hip X-ray radiographic assessment will record; femoral shortening; femoral shaft medialisation; offset; tip-apex distance If a long nail is used or if there are concerns over fixation, a full length AP and lateral femur X-ray will be conducted in addition.	Pre-Op (Day prior to or day of surgery), immediately post-op and 6 months post-surgery
Modified Harris Hip Score	The HHS was developed to assess the results of hip surgery, first described in 1969 . A modified version (mHHS) is used in this study which records the subjects' experience of pain (worth a maximum of 44 points) and activities of daily living and gait (worth a maximum of 47 points). A higher score is associated with a better outcome. Questions include pain experienced, the distance the subject can walk, ability to put on socks and shoes, ability to use public transportation, supports needed, limp, ability to use stairs and any problems in sitting. Deformity and range of motion measurements are excluded from the standard HHS in order to allow remote completion. This assessment is recorded by a clinician onto the CRF via interview with the subject.	8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
EQ-5D	The EuroQol EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for use as a measurement of health outcome. It consists of a descriptive system with 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) which are each assigned three levels (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) and a Visual Analogue Scale where subjects indicate a numerical value from 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 is the best imaginable health state. The EQ-5D is a patient reported outcome.	8 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Log of opioid medication administered	A daily assessment of opioid usage will be made including recording; • For each adminstration; Drug; Dose; Route of administration; Time of administration	Daily from day 1 post-surgery to discharge (estimated 2 weeks post-surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics AG
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Stephen Mitchell, MBChB FRCS, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): September 30, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 30, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): September 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 24, 2016
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 24, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): February 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 29, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 27, 2019
• Last Verified: March 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Fractures, Bone; Wounds and Injuries; Leg Injuries; Femoral Fractures; Hip Injuries; Hip Fractures
• Other Study ID Numbers: 15-3031-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No