InterTAN: Integrated Dual Screw Design Improve Biomechanics/Function Following Fixation Surgery

March 21, 2024 updated by: Paul E. Matuszewski

Does an Integrated Dual Screw Design Improve Biomechanics and Function Following Fixation of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Randomized Pilot Trial (InterTAN)

The goal of this pilot, patient blinded randomized trial is to develop a mechanistic understanding of gait following fixation of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures and return to function and pain control. The guiding hypothesis that will be tested in a subsequent clinical trial is that the InterTAN when compared to standard lag-screw cephalomedullary nails will have decreased post operative pain, earlier return to symmetric weight bearing, and quicker return to pre-injury functioning levels.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1: Determine the feasibility of conducting a randomized trial assessing gait mechanics as well as outcomes following unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails. This will be achieved by performing a pilot randomized trial comparing the InterTAN versus a single-screw design cephalomedullary nail (SSCMN). Deliverable: Preliminary data to support a larger randomized trial powered on either mechanical assessments or patient reported outcomes. Feasibility of conducting comprehensive biomechanical and patient related outcome measurements in the geriatric hip fracture population.

Aim 2: Determine the pathway to return to function and symmetric weight bearing. Load bearing will be assessed through insole monitoring during their inpatient stay and 2-weeks post-op. Additionally, analysis will be performed to measure gait for hip motion, loading, strength and functional assessments at 6,12, and 26 weeks post-op. Patients will also be assessed at 1-year for reported function as well. Hypothesis: Patients in the InterTAN group will have faster return to symmetrical weight bearing/motion and earlier return to function. Deliverable: Longitudinal data assessing return to function and weight bearing in intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Aim 3: Determine if use of the InterTAN device when compared to SSCMN results in decreased pain following unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures. Patients will be enrolled in a prospective trial with standardized pain control regimen, assessing patients for pain during their hospital stay using Area Under the Curve Analysis of Visual Analogue Pain Scores at 24, 48 and 72 hours. Similarly, opioid usage in morphine milligram equivalents will be assessed. Pain will be assessed at follow-up visits 6, 12, 26, 52 weeks. Hypothesis: The InterTAN will result in decreased pain in the immediate post-operative period and in sub-acute post-operative period.

Aim 4: Determine if the use of the InterTAN device when compared to SSCMN results in decreased healthcare utilization. Participation with therapy, hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, and time-spent in rehabilitation facility will be assessed. Hypothesis: Patients in the InterTAN group will be more likely to be discharged home, participate with therapy more, have decreased length of stay in both inpatient and outpatient units. Deliverable: Data to inform the power analysis for a larger prospective clinical trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-pathologic fractures
  • OTA/AO classification 31A2, 31A3 fractures
  • Ability to participate in 4-MET equivalent activities without ambulatory assistance prior to injury

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to consent
  • Inability to participate in follow-up activities
  • History of chronic pain / current opioid treatment
  • Pre-injury ambulatory status requiring assistance device
  • Neurological condition altering gait or sensation (e.g. History of stroke with altered gait, peripheral neuropathy).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Trigen InterTan
Patients in this arm will be implanted with the cephalomedullary nail Trigen InterTan manufactured by Smith & Nephew.
Surgical fixation with Smith and Nephew Trigen InterTAN cephalomedullary long nail; Pelvic fractures will be repaired utilizing Smith and Nephew Trigen InterTAN.
Active Comparator: Synthes TFNA
Patients in this arm will be implanted with the single-screw device TFNA manufactured by DePuy Synthes.
Surgical fixation with single-screw device Synthes TFNA; Pelvic fractures will be repaired utilizing single-screw device Synthes TFNA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in self-reported physical function
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Questionnaire is a 53 question survey with a five point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 where a higher number indicates less physical function.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Change in self-reported pain
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Questionnaire is a 56 question survey with a five point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5 where a higher number indicates increased interference due to pain.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is a tool used to measure the level of disability as well as the change in patient status. FI is comprised of 18 items, grouped into 2 subscales - motor and cognition. Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Change in pain assessment
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to measure pain intensity. This is a four-item scale that measures current, worst, least, and average pain. Each of these four items are measured on a numeric scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being ''no pain'' and 10 being ''severe pain.''
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Change in weight bearing
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
The ground reaction forces of the injured and non injured limb will be evaluated over the course of recovery to assess when loading between limbs becomes symmetric during their physical therapy.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
Change in Visual Analog Pain Score
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months
The visual analog pain score is a horizontal line with a scale ranging from 0 to 10 where a higher number indicates more pain.
2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 26 weeks, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paul Matuszewski, MD, University of Kentucky

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ORTHO-22-INTERTAN

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fracture of Hip

Clinical Trials on Trigen InterTAN

3
Subscribe