A Randomised Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of a Vaginal Insert in Pregnant Women at Term

October 30, 2020 updated by: Ferring Pharmaceuticals

A Multicentre, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of FE 999901 Vaginal Insert in Pregnant Women at Term (41 Weeks of Gestation) Requiring Cervical Ripening

To demonstrate the efficacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) for cervical ripening success (either bishop score (BS) ≥7 or vaginal delivery) within 12 hours of vaginal insert administration

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Chiba, Japan
        • Asahi General Hospital
      • Ibaraki, Japan
        • University of Tsukuba Hospital
      • Kanagawa, Japan
        • Hori Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Aizenbashi Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Osaka University Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Rinku General Medical Center
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Keio University Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Juntendo University Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Seibo Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Showa University Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • St.Luke's International Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • The University of Tokyo Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center
      • Yokohama, Japan
        • Keiyu Hospital
    • Osaka
      • Izumi, Osaka, Japan
        • Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health
    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
        • Hamamatsu University Hospital
      • Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
        • Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital
    • Tochigi
      • Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
        • Jichi Medical University Hospital
    • Tokyo
      • Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
        • Itabashi Chuo Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women at term (≥ 41 weeks 0 day and ≤ 41 weeks 6 days of gestation) at the Baseline visit
  • Candidate for pharmacologic induction of labour
  • Singleton pregnancy with live infant in vertex presentation
  • Baseline BS ≤ 4 at the Baseline visit
  • Parity ≤ 3 (parity is defined as one or more births live or stillbirths after 22 weeks 0 day gestation)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women in labour
  • Presence of uterine or cervical scar including scar from previous caesarean section, and previous cone biopsy of the cervix and loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
  • Uterine abnormality e.g. bicornuate uterus
  • Administration of oxytocin, any cervical ripening or labour inducing agents (including mechanical methods) or a tocolytic drug within 7 days prior to IMP administration. Magnesium sulfate is permitted if prescribed as treatment for preeclampsia or pregnancy induced hypertension
  • Presence of the following conditions/symptoms:

Systolic blood pressure > 160 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg. Platelets < 100,000/µL. Increased liver function tests (2x upper limits of normal range). Severe, persistent right upper quadrant/epigastric pain. Progressive renal insufficiency: Creatinine > 1.1 mg/dL, Doubling of creatinine in the absence of other renal disease. Pulmonary edema. New onset cerebral or visual disturbances

  • Suspected or confirmed cephalopelvic disproportion and/or fetal malpresentation
  • Diagnosed congenital abnormalities, not including polydactyly
  • Suspected or confirmed intrauterine growth retardation (≤ 1.5 SD of mean normal estimated fetal weight for dates)
  • Any evidence of fetal compromise at baseline visit (e.g., non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, meconium staining, history of non-reassuring fetal status or abnormal umbilical artery Doppler wave form)
  • Intake of medication with aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at baseline visit
  • Ruptured membranes
  • Suspected clinical chorioamnionitis
  • Current pelvic inflammatory disease, unless adequate prior treatment has been instituted
  • Fever (axillary temperature ≥ 38.0 °C) at the Baseline visit
  • Any condition in which vaginal delivery is contraindicated (eg., placenta previa or any unexplained vaginal bleeding at any time after 24 weeks 0 day during this pregnancy)
  • Known or suspected allergy to, dinoprostone other prostaglandins or any constituent of IMP
  • Any condition urgently requiring delivery
  • History of asthma or glaucoma
  • Unable to comply with the protocol
  • Any other medical condition which in the judgement of the investigator would impair participation in the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
The placebo product is identical with the active product except that it does not contain Dinoprostone.
Experimental: Dinoprostone vaginal insert
The DVI contains 10 mg Dinoprostone
Other Names:
  • CERVIDIL®
  • PROPESS®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of women with cervical ripening success
Time Frame: Within 12 hours of vaginal insert administration
Defined as either Bishop Score (BS) ≥7 or a vaginal delivery
Within 12 hours of vaginal insert administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of nulliparous and multiparous subjects with cervical ripening success
Time Frame: Within 12 hours of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) administration
Collected labour data and delivery data
Within 12 hours of Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) administration
Proportion of subjects delivering vaginally
Time Frame: Within 12 hours of IMP administration
Collected labour and delivery data
Within 12 hours of IMP administration
Proportion of subjects delivering vaginally
Time Frame: Within the first admission to hospital
Collected labour data and delivery data
Within the first admission to hospital
Proportion of subjects with a BS increase ≥3 points from baseline
Time Frame: Within 12 hours of IMP administration
Measured by BS assessments
Within 12 hours of IMP administration
Proportion of subjects who have a caesarean delivery within the first admission to hospital
Time Frame: At time of delivery
Data collected during the first admission to hospital
At time of delivery
Proportion of subjects who receive pre-delivery oxytocic drugs and dose of pre-delivery oxytocic drugs
Time Frame: From the IMP removal to delivery
Collected pre-delivery data
From the IMP removal to delivery
Proportion of subjects who undergo mechanical cervical ripening
Time Frame: At least 60 minutes after the removal of the IMP
Collected labour data
At least 60 minutes after the removal of the IMP
Duration of mechanical cervical ripening for subjects who undergo mechanical Cervical ripening
Time Frame: Time from at least 60 minutes after the removal of the IMP until end of any mechanical ripening
Measured as start date and time of first mechanical ripening and the end date and time of last mechanical ripening
Time from at least 60 minutes after the removal of the IMP until end of any mechanical ripening
Proportion of subjects with BS ≥7
Time Frame: At onset of labour
Among those having onset of labour while IMP is in-situ
At onset of labour
Time from IMP administration to onset of active labour
Time Frame: Interval from IMP administration to onset of active labour
Within the first admission to hospital
Interval from IMP administration to onset of active labour
Time from IMP administration to vaginal delivery, caesarean delivery and any delivery
Time Frame: Interval from IMP administration to delivery
Within the first admission to hospital
Interval from IMP administration to delivery
Type, frequency and intensity of intrapartum adverse events (AEs), postpartum AEs and neonatal AEs
Time Frame: From obtaining the informed consent through end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Assessed up to time when the subjects are discharged from the hospital
From obtaining the informed consent through end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Type, frequency and intensity of intrapartum AEs
Time Frame: From onset of labour to the removal of the IMP
Assessed up to time when the deliveries occur
From onset of labour to the removal of the IMP
Change in maternal parameters of vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate and body temperature)
Time Frame: From baseline through end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Assessed up to time when the subjects are discharged from the hospital
From baseline through end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Change in maternal parameters of haematology, clinical chemistry and urinalysis
Time Frame: From baseline to end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Assessed up to time when the subjects are discharged from the hospital
From baseline to end of trial (expected average of up to 1 week)
Proportion of neonates with Apgar Score <7
Time Frame: 5 minutes post-birth
Measured as Apgar Score assessments
5 minutes post-birth
pH in umbilical artery blood samples
Time Frame: At birth
pH evaluation
At birth
Rate of admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for at least 24 hours
Time Frame: After delivery
Admission/discharge data from NICU
After delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 000262

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Ripening

Clinical Trials on Dinoprostone

3
Subscribe