- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03075865
A Cohort Study for Clinical Evaluation of OmniMax MMF System (OmniMax)
July 16, 2021 updated by: Zimmer Biomet
The OmniMax MMF System: A Cohort Study for Clinical Evaluation
OmniMax MMF system was designed as a device with faster application/removal time, less mucosal tissue overgrowth over the plates and screws, better tolerance for placement over prolong periods of time, better patient hygiene and a lower risk for further treatments secondary to root damage from the insertion of the screws, compared to the standard of care for maxillo-mandibular fixation and other hybrid systems.
This clinical trial intends to highlight the clinical benefits of the OmniMax MMF system applied to patients undergoing repair of uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s) for whom OmniMax MMF system is used as a single mean for maxillo-mandibular fixation.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The objective of this study is to highlight and evaluate the clinical benefits of OmniMax MMF system applied to patients undergoing repair of uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s).
A total of 50 subjects involved in trauma events resulting in uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s) will be enrolled at up to 5 sites from 3 surgical subspecialties: maxillofacial surgery, ENT, and plastic surgery.
Subjects considered for participation will receive OmniMax MMF system for maxillo-mandibular fixation for a period of 4 to 8 weeks.
Incidence of root damage associated with screw insertion, time for implantation and removal of the device, oral hygiene during the maxillomandibular fixation period, mucosal overgrowth, gingival necrosis, post-operative pain, stability of the occlusion, fracture healing, patient overall satisfaction/compliance with length of treatment, incidence of glove perforation and accidental puncture, will be evaluated in all participants who remain in IMF post-operatively.
Adverse Events associated with the use of OmniMax MMF system will also be collected.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
39
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- University of California Davis Medical Center
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- University of Iowa
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
- College of Dental Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adults involved in trauma events resulting in uncomplicated mandibular fractures and needing intermaxillary fixation for fracture repair and fracture healing.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females
- 18 years of age or older
- Able and willing to sign ICF and medical photography consent
- Undergoing a surgical procedure to repair uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s) requiring open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or closed maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF)
- Fracture repair done within 10 days after facial trauma
- Use of OmniMax MMF system as a single mean for IMF (maxillary plate and mandibular plates together with no other device combined, such as Erich bars or IMF screws).
Exclusion Criteria:
- General contraindications unfavorable for the use of MMF (psychological disorders, seizures disorders, airway compromise, immune-compromised patients, etc).
- History of radiation therapy to the head or neck region.
- Limited blood supply to the area of device application.
- Insufficient quantity or quality of bone.
- History of foreign body sensitivity.
- History of previous use of bisphosphonates (i.e. alendronate, pamidronate, neridronate, olpadronate, ibandronate, risendronate, zolendronate).
- Clinically active or latent infection.
- Patients with less than 20 teeth.
- Deciduous dentition.
- Patients for whom the use of OmniMax MMF system would not be appropriate in judgment of the surgeon (i.e., excessive overjet or deep overbite).
- Mandibular fracture pattern that could prevent the use of OmniMax MMF system for adequate reduction and stabilization (i.e., comminuted fractures, dental alveolar fractures).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OmniMax MMF
Patients involved in trauma events will receive intermaxillary fixation with OmniMax MMF system for temporary stabilization of mandibular fracture(s) to maintain proper occlusion during surgery and allow for postoperative fracture healing.
|
OmniMax MMF system consists of arch bars and screws that work together to achieve temporary fixation of the maxilla and mandible to provide indirect or passive stabilization of fractures and maintenance of occlusion in the oral and maxillofacial region.
The arch bars have hooks designed to accommodate either wires or elastic bands for temporary maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) either intraoperative or postoperative.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Root Damage
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Dental root damage can be caused from insertion of the screws at time of implantation.
Some of these events may require further medical or surgical treatment
|
6 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time for Implantation of OmniMax MMF
Time Frame: Operative
|
The OmniMax MMF system, with a better segmentalized design and extended screw slots, allows for fixation of this device using less quantity of screws for fixation (compared to other hybrid systems).
This system may impact the efficiency of the medical care by significantly reducing the operative time.
|
Operative
|
Tissue necrosis and mucosal overgrowth
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
The reduced number of screws needed to fixate a full OmniMax MMF system (8 versus up to 14 in other bone-borne systems) is expected to improve the post-operative gingival tissue health, avoiding soft tissue irritation, overgrowth, compression and necrosis of the gingival area.
|
6 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Less screws for fixation and design of the device to protect the soft tissue is expected to increase the level of patient satisfaction and patient compliance with both, the oral hygiene and the length of fixation period.
|
6 weeks
|
Gloves Perforation and Accidental Puncture
Time Frame: Operative
|
Design of OmniMax MMF system is expected to reduce the risk for accidental glove perforation and/or wire puncture during implantation of the device.
|
Operative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Brian M Hatcher, PhD, Zimmer Biomet CMF & Thoracic
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Engelstad ME, Kelly P. Embrasure wires for intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation are rapid and effective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;69(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.209. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
- Ansari K, Hamlar D, Ho V, Hilger P, Cote D, Aziz T. A comparison of anterior vs posterior isolated mandible fractures treated with intermaxillary fixation screws. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Jul-Aug;13(4):266-70. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.46.
- Sahoo NK, Mohan R. IMF Screw: An Ideal Intermaxillary Fixation Device During Open Reduction of Mandibular Fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010 Jun;9(2):170-2. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0049-0. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
- Cornelius CP, Ehrenfeld M. The Use of MMF Screws: Surgical Technique, Indications, Contraindications, and Common Problems in Review of the Literature. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010 Jun;3(2):55-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254376.
- Roccia F, Rossi P, Gallesio C, Boffano P. Self-tapping and self-drilling screws for intermaxillary fixation in management of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):68-70. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190df2f.
- Bagheri SC, Dimassi M, Shahriari A, Khan HA, Jo C, Steed MB. Facial trauma coverage among level-1 trauma centers of the United States. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.020.
- Gaujac C, Ceccheti MM, Yonezaki F, Garcia IR Jr, Peres MP. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1922-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.311.
- Coletti DP, Salama A, Caccamese JF Jr. Application of intermaxillary fixation screws in maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.022.
- Fabbroni G, Aabed S, Mizen K, Starr DG. Transalveolar screws and the incidence of dental damage: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul;33(5):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.014.
- Ayoub AF, Rowson J. Comparative assessment of two methods used for interdental immobilization. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;31(3):159-61. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(03)00022-2.
- Vartanian AJ, Alvi A. Bone-screw mandible fixation: an intraoperative alternative to arch bars. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Dec;123(6):718-21. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.111286.
- Valentino J, Marentette LJ. Supplemental maxillomandibular fixation with miniplate osteosynthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Feb;112(2):215-20. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989570239-3.
- Hashemi HM, Parhiz A. Complications using intermaxillary fixation screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1411-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.070. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
- Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Rao J. Self Tapping Screws v/s Erich Arch Bar for Inter Maxillary Fixation: A Comparative Clinical Study in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011 Jun;10(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0191-3. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Rai A, Datarkar A, Borle RM. Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than Erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):3015-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
- Schulte-Geers M, Kater W, Seeberger R. Root trauma and tooth loss through the application of pre-drilled transgingival fixation screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;40(7):e214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
- Park KN, Oh SM, Lee CY, Kim JY, Yang BE. Design and application of hybrid maxillomandibular fixation for facial bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(5):1801-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a21163.
- Chao AH, Hulsen J. Bone-supported arch bars are associated with comparable outcomes to Erich arch bars in the treatment of mandibular fractures with intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Feb;73(2):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.08.025. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
- Ingole PD, Garg A, Shenoi SR, Badjate SJ, Budhraja N. Comparison of intermaxillary fixation screw versus eyelet interdental wiring for intermaxillary fixation in minimally displaced mandibular fracture: a randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;72(5):958.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
- West GH, Griggs JA, Chandran R, Precheur HV, Buchanan W, Caloss R. Treatment outcomes with the use of maxillomandibular fixation screws in the management of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
- Meursinge Reynders R, Ladu L, Ronchi L, Di Girolamo N, de Lange J, Roberts N, Pluddemann A. Insertion torque recordings for the diagnosis of contact between orthodontic mini-implants and dental roots: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 2;4:39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0014-6.
- Laurentjoye M, Majoufre-Lefebvre C, Siberchicot F, Ricard AS. Result of maxillomandibular fixation using intraoral cortical bone screws for condylar fractures of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):767-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.055.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 28, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 10, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
June 28, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 3, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 19, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 16, 2021
Last Verified
July 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1116
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures
-
Junhui CuiWest China HospitalCompletedMandibular Fracture
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedOrthognathic Surgery | Mandibular Fracture Trauma | Maxillofacial OsteotomyFrance
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRecruitingIntra-articular Fracture of the Mandibular CondyleFrance
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownMinimally Displaced Mandibular Angle Fracture
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Stryker InstrumentsRecruitingMandibular FracturesUnited States
-
Ayub Teaching HospitalUniversité MontpellierCompletedFractures, Bone | Mandibular FracturesPakistan
-
Fayoum UniversityUnknown
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanCompleted
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanUnknown
Clinical Trials on OmniMax MMF system
-
AO Clinical Investigation and Publishing DocumentationRecruitingMandibular FracturesGermany, United States
-
Peking University People's HospitalUnknownNatural Killer Cell Mediated ImmunityChina
-
Hannover Medical SchoolCompleted
-
AZ-VUBUnknownDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Belgium
-
Assiut UniversityRecruiting
-
Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalCompleted
-
Fuzhou General HospitalUnknownKidney Transplant | Chronic Allograft NephropathyChina
-
University Hospital, LimogesNot yet recruitingLiver Transplantation | ImmunosuppressionFrance
-
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRecruitingMycophenolate Mofetil | Henoch-Schönlein Purpura | Gastrointestinal InjuryChina