- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03078075
Accelerated Development of Additive Pharmacotherapy Treatment (ADAPT-2) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder (ADAPT-2)
NIDA (National Institute on Drug Abuse) CTN (Clinical Trials Network) Protocol 0068: Accelerated Development of Additive Pharmacotherapy Treatment (ADAPT-2) for Methamphetamine Use Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90038
- University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Center for Behavioral Addiction Medicine (CBAM)
-
San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
- Substance Use Research Unit (SURU) at the San Francisco Dept. of Public Health
-
-
Minnesota
-
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55415
- Hennepin County Medical Center- Berman Center for Research
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (NYSPI)- Substance Use Research Center (SURC)
-
-
Oregon
-
Portland, Oregon, United States, 97214
- CODA, Inc.
-
-
South Carolina
-
Pickens, South Carolina, United States, 29671
- Behavioral Health Services (BHS) of Pickens County
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77054
- University of Texas Health Science Center - Center for Neurobehavioral Research on Addiction (CNRA)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 to 65 years old;
- Interested in reducing/stopping methamphetamine use;
- Speak English;
- Agree to use acceptable birth control (if applicable);
- Be opioid-free at randomization;
- Willing to comply with all study procedures and medication instructions;
- Agree to use a cell phone (or similar study device) to take videos of medication dosing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical or psychiatric condition which would make participation unsafe;
- Recently participated in a study of pharmacological or behavioral treatment for methamphetamine use disorder;
- Recently taken an investigational drug;
- Prescribed and taken naltrexone or bupropion ≤ 30 days from consent;
- Current or planned extended absence during study period (e.g., jail, surgery, pending legal action);
- Currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active Medication Combination (AMC)
injectable extended release naltrexone plus once daily oral extended-release bupropion tablets
|
Naltrexone: 380 mg vial, 4 intramuscular injections administered every 3 weeks
Other Names:
Bupropion: 450 mg oral dose daily
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Matched Placebo (PLB)
injectable matching placebo plus once-daily oral placebo tablets
|
Placebo: 4 intramuscular injections administered every 3 weeks
Other Names:
Placebo: once-daily oral placebo tablets
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Response During Medication Phase at Stage 1
Time Frame: At weeks 6
|
Treatment response is defined as 'Responder' and 'Non-Responder'. Responder : Participant who meet responder criterion by providing at least 3 out of a possible 4 methamphetamine-negative urine tests at the end of stage 1 (weeks 5-6). Non-Responder: All other participants without 3 or 4 methamphetamine-negative UDS (Urine Drug Screen). |
At weeks 6
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Response During Medication Phase at Stage 2
Time Frame: At week 12
|
Treatment response is defined as 'Responder' and 'Non-Responder'. Responder : Participant who meet responder criterion by providing at least 3 out of a possible 4 methamphetamine-negative urine tests at the end of stage 1 (weeks 5-6). Non-Responder: All other participants without 3 or 4 methamphetamine-negative UDS. |
At week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Effectiveness Score of Participants at Stage 1
Time Frame: At weeks 6
|
The Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) as measured by UDS results, during the treatment period.
The TES is the percentage of the expected urine drug screens that were negative for each drug.
Twelve urine drug screens are expected within each stage.
|
At weeks 6
|
|
Treatment Effectiveness Score of Participants at Stage 2
Time Frame: At week 12
|
The Treatment Effectiveness Score (TES) as measured by UDS results, during the treatment period.
The TES is the percentage of the expected urine drug screens that were negative for each drug.
Twelve urine drug screens are expected within each stage.
The range of possible scores are 0-100 and higher score indicates better outcomes.
|
At week 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Used Methamphetamine in the Pre-evaluation Period
Time Frame: Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 7-10
|
Methamphetamine use, as measured by UDS (urine drug screen) in the pre-evaluation period (Weeks 1-4 for Stage 1 and Weeks 7-10 for Stage 2 )
|
Weeks 1-4 and Weeks 7-10
|
|
Mean Maximum Number of Consecutive Visits Negative UDS at Stage 1
Time Frame: At week 6
|
Measured by maximum consecutive negative UDS: Count the number and range 0-12 and report the maximum number.
|
At week 6
|
|
Mean Maximum Number of Consecutive Visits Negative UDS at Stage 2
Time Frame: Stage 2 evaluation period at Weeks 12
|
Measured by maximum consecutive negative UDS: Count the number and range 0-12 and report the maximum number.
|
Stage 2 evaluation period at Weeks 12
|
|
Mean Number of Study Weeks With Two Methamphetamine-negative UDS at Stage 1
Time Frame: At week 6
|
Measured by the number of study weeks during the treatment period with two methamphetamine-negative UDS.
|
At week 6
|
|
Mean Number of Study Weeks With Two Methamphetamine-negative UDS at Stage 2
Time Frame: At week12
|
Measured by the number of study weeks during the treatment period with two methamphetamine-negative UDS.
|
At week12
|
|
Mean Change of Percentage of Methamphetamine Abstinent Days Measured by Self-report at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Methamphetamine use selfreported on TLFB ( Timeline Followback) during the follow-up period. The baseline measure is the percentage of abstinent days in the 30 days prior to randomization. The outcome is the change in percentage of abstinent days. |
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change Percentage of Methamphetamine Abstinent Days Measured by Self-report at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Methamphetamine use selfreported on TLFB ( Timeline Followback) during the follow-up period. The baseline measure is the percentage of abstinent days in the 30 days prior to randomization. The outcome is the change in percentage of abstinent days. |
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Change of Methamphetamine Craving at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Severity of methamphetamine craving, as measured by Visual Analog Craving Scales (VAS), during the treatment period.
VAS scores range from 0 (no craving) to 100 (most intense craving possible).
The VAS is completed at screening, once a week during the treatment period, and at the follow-up visits.
|
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change of Methamphetamine Craving at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Severity of methamphetamine craving, as measured by Visual Analog Craving Scales (VAS), during the treatment period.
VAS scores range from 0 (no craving) to 100 (most intense craving possible).
The VAS is completed at screening, once a week during the treatment period, and at the follow-up visits.
|
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Number of Abstinent Days of Participants Who Used Other Substance Measured by UDS at Stage 1
Time Frame: At week 6
|
Other substance use including Amphetamine, Non-Methamphetamine Drug, Cocaine, Alcohol, Cigarettes, as measured by UDS, during the treatment period.
Opioid use will also be assessed using the Opioid 2000 ng tests on the UDS.
|
At week 6
|
|
Mean Number of Abstinent Days of Participants Who Used Other Substance Measured by UDS at Stage 2
Time Frame: at week 12
|
Other substance use including Amphetamine, Non-Methamphetamine Drug, Cocaine, Alcohol, Cigarettes, as measured by UDS, during the treatment period.
Opioid use will also be assessed using the Opioid 2000 ng tests on the UDS.
|
at week 12
|
|
Mean Change of Proportion of Other Substance Abstinent Days Measured by Self-report at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Proportion of abstinent days of other substance including Alcohol, Cigarettes and E- Cigarettes was measured by self-report on TLFB during the treatment period.
|
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change of Proportion of Other Substance Abstinent Days Measured by Self-report at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Proportion of abstinent days of other substance including Alcohol, Cigarettes and E- Cigarettes was measured by self-report on TLFB during the treatment period.
|
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Change in Number of Other Substance Use by Self-report at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Number of other substance (Alcohol and Cigarettes) use was measured by self-report recall on Timeline Followback (TLFB) during the treatment period.
|
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change in Number of Other Substance Use by Self-report at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Number of other substance (Alcohol and Cigarettes) use was measured by self-report recall on Timeline Followback (TLFB) during the treatment period.
|
week 7, week 12
|
|
Change in Proportion of E-cigarettes Abstinent Days by Self-report at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Proportion of abstinent days of E- Cigarettes was measured by self-report at stage 1.
|
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Change in Proportion of E-cigarettes Abstinent Days by Self-report at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Proportion of abstinent days of E- Cigarettes was measured by self-report at stage 2.
|
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Change of Depression Symptom Score by PHQ-9 at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) measures participants depression symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating a more severe depression symptoms. PHQ-9 scores reflect depression severity, ranges from 0-27 (0 no depressive symptoms, 1-4 minimal depression, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression) |
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change of Depression Symptom Score by PHQ-9 at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 measures participants depression symptoms. Possible scores range from 0-27, with higher scores indicating a more severe depression symptoms. PHQ-9 scores reflect depression severity, ranges from 0-27 (0 no depressive symptoms, 1-4 minimal depression, 5-9 mild depression, 10-14 moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, 20-27 severe depression) |
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Change of Quality of Life (QOL) by PhenX Core Tier 1 Instrument at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
|
Mean change score of QOL (General health, Physical health, and Mental health) from baseline will be assessed by PhenX (Phenotypes and eXposures) Core Tier 1 instrument: Quality of Life (QOL), which measures participants' quality of life during the past 30 days.
Possible scores range from 0 to 30 (number of days in the past 30 in which health was good), with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
|
Baseline, Week 6
|
|
Mean Change of Quality of Life (QOL) by PhenX Core Tier 1 Instrument at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
Mean change score of QOL (General health, Physical health, and Mental health) from baseline will be assessed by PhenX Core Tier 1 instrument: Quality of Life (QOL), which measures participants' quality of life during the past 30 days.
Possible scores range from 0 to 30 (number of days in the past 30 in which health was good), with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
|
week 7, week 12
|
|
Mean Change of Overall Functioning as Measured by Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) at Stage 1
Time Frame: Baseline, week 6
|
The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment is a 4-item self-administered assessment that uses a Likert scale (1-10) to document changes in four life domains: substance use, health, lifestyle, and community and is collected at screening, mid-treatment (Week 6 Visit 2) and end-of-treatment (Week 12 Visit 2). Possible scores range from 4-40, with higher scores indicating a higher overall functioning. |
Baseline, week 6
|
|
Mean Change of Overall Functioning as Measured by Treatment Effectiveness Assessment (TEA) at Stage 2
Time Frame: week 7, week 12
|
The Treatment Effectiveness Assessment is a 4-item self-administered assessment that uses a Likert scale (1-10) to document changes in four life domains: substance use, health, lifestyle, and community and is collected at screening, mid-treatment (Week 6 Visit 2) and end-of-treatment (Week 12 Visit 2). Possible scores range from 4-40, with higher scores indicating a higher overall functioning. |
week 7, week 12
|
|
Number of Participants Who Completed the Visit in Week 12
Time Frame: At week 12
|
At week 12
|
|
|
Participant Satisfaction Rating Measured by Study Satisfaction Survey at the End of the Study
Time Frame: At week 12
|
The Study satisfaction survey measures participants satisfaction.
We do not have a proper score range (varied range with some free text questions also)
|
At week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Sensory System Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Antidepressive Agents
- Dopamine Agents
- Narcotic Antagonists
- Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation
- Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6 Inhibitors
- Alcohol Deterrents
- Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
- Naltrexone
- Bupropion
Other Study ID Numbers
- CTN-0068
- UG1DA020024 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Methamphetamine Use Disorder
-
Elazığ Mental Health and Diseases HospitalRecruitingMethamphetamine Use Disorder | Methamphetamine Induced PsychosisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Yale UniversityCollege on Problems of Drug DependenceEnrolling by invitationMethamphetamine Use Disorder | Cocaine Use Disorder | Stimulant Use DisorderUnited States
-
William StoopsNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)RecruitingMethamphetamine Use DisorderUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Recruiting
-
William StoopsNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Recruiting
-
Hanoi Medical UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Active, not recruitingMethamphetamine Use DisorderVietnam
-
Turning PointMonash University; Eastern Health; Deakin UniversityCompletedMethamphetamine Use DisorderAustralia
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Terminated
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingMethamphetamine Use DisorderUnited States
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterHanyang Drug Rehabilitation Center; Chengdu Drug Rehabilitation CenterRecruitingMethamphetamine Use DisorderChina
Clinical Trials on Naltrexone: Vivitrol®
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcohol Dependence | Human Immunodeficiency Virus | AIDS | Hazardous Drinking | Problem DrinkingUnited States
-
Alkermes, Inc.CompletedOpiate DependenceRussian Federation
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthTerminated
-
NYU Langone HealthAlkermes, Inc.Completed
-
Alkermes, Inc.Completed
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Completed
-
Alkermes, Inc.Completed
-
Alkermes, Inc.CompletedAlcohol DependenceUnited States
-
Alkermes, Inc.Completed