Comparison Between Two Mobilization Techniques of Ankle on Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

October 24, 2017 updated by: Pedro Olavo de Paula Lima, Universidade Federal do Ceará

Comparison Between Two Mobilization Techniques With and Without Ankle Thrust on Balance in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

The ankle joint is often affected by injuries, especially lateral sprains, often leading to chronic instability. Joint mobilization techniques seem to influence the sense of joint positioning. The objective of the study is to compare mobilization techniques in the balance of athletes with chronic ankle instability. A randomized clinical trial with participants allocated in three groups: Talocrural manipulation, mobilization with movement and placebo will be assessed in their primary endpoints and secondary balance and dorsiflexion range of motion respectively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Biodex Balance System: The unipodal stability protocol was used in the anteroposterior and laterolateral directions. The test lasts for 20 seconds with five levels of instability, with level six being more stable and level two more unstable. The participant performed an adaptation test with the system and subsequently assessed the performance of the balance in three tests in each limb between each 10-second test. This will be instructed about the positioning during its evaluation, being oriented to keep the gaze in the previous direction; Hands on waist; Contralateral knee flexed at 90º, foot positioning is referenced in degrees on the platform as anthropometric information provided on the participant. At the end, the results of the anteroposterior and lateral-lateral directions and the general index were collected.

Weight Bearing Lunge Test (WBLT): The WBLT consisting of the use of a tape measure has no soil in which the participant will support or be evaluated so that the first finger touches On the tape and its distance to a reference wall for tape measurement. Required that the participant performs ankle dorsiflexion in CCF with the purpose of approaching the knee in the wall avoiding to remove the heel of the ground, that is on a marking.

Y test: To evaluate the dynamic balance and reach of lower limbs will be used The test balance consisting of the evaluation of the participant's performance during the movements of anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral angle with the value measured in centimeters with metric tapes In Direction.

The protocol performed six replicates for adaptation and one final repeat that is considered as a result of the test. For an earlier point, the reference point used is not support for a fixed reference point for the intersection of the conditions and for two other directions used. It is necessary that the participant be the same as the member farthest from the starting point without touching the tape. At the end of the seventh repetition is measured or value and considered the test result.

Intervention: Participants are divided into three groups: Thrust Group in open kinetic chain; MWM group in closed kinetic chain and control group with placebo intervention. Allocation in one of the groups will be randomized by lot.

Taken as applications of the questionnaires and initial evaluations (BBS, WBLT, Y Test), the assays receive a specific technique, are reassessed with the BBS and WBLT.

Talocrural manipulation: The technique of talocrural manipulation consists in the application of traction with a high caudal direction. Follow with the participant in supine position and as two hands to therapist around the talocrural joint, fifth finger in the anterior talar region and the two thumbs in the plantar area do the participant performing a manipulation in the affected limb. It is not considered an audible cavitation presence.

Mobilization with Motion (MWM): The Mulligan® concept-mobilized manual therapy technique follows the following protocol: the athlete is positioned on a stretcher with the limb treated in hip and knee flexion and the contralateral limb in knee flexion And neutral hip. With the use of a belt in the hip region of the physiotherapist and on a distal tibiofibular joint of the participant and bulkhead between the limb and the belt, they are placed as two hands of the physiotherapist superimposed non-talus for stabilization. With the posterior removal of the physiotherapist's hip a distal end of the tibia and fibula will be tractioned and maintained anteriorly, while requested that the participant performed an active knee flexion movement in a closed kinetic chain in order to force the movement of ankle dorsiflexion And thus, once the end point for the purpose, a mobilization will be held for 10 seconds. The patient will return to the starting point resting for 20 seconds for a next mobilization. In all, 4 separate mobilizations.

Placebo intervention: The positioning of the hand in the specific treatment condition (Thrust or MWM) will be accurately reproduced, however, without any movement or force being applied. All interactions, procedures and deadlines are identical.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ceará
      • Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 60416130

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be a regular practitioner of some sporting modality (with a minimum of one year of practice and training frequency of twice a week), with a history of at least one unilateral ankle sprain with episodes of pain and decreased function, as well as a subjective report of Ankle instability (sensation of falsehood) after ligament injury associated with a result lower than 24 points in the Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool - CAIT

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with acute or subacute lesions and / or lower limb surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental MWM

Other names:

4 mobilizations - 10 seconds 20 seconds of rest

Mobilization with Movement
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Active Comparator: Experimental Thrust

Other names:

1 traction with caudal direction in high speed and low amplitude increasing dorsiflexion.

Mobilization with Movement
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Other names:

It will accurately reproduce the positioning of the hand in the specific treatment condition (Thrust or MWM), however, without applying any movement or force. All interactions, procedures and deadlines will be identical.

Mobilization with Movement
Mobilization grade 5 (Thrust)
Procedures similar to Experimental MWM group, but without aplly any force

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Balance assessed with Biodex Balance System
Time Frame: almost 10 minutes
Balance assessed with Biodex Balance System (stabilometry plattaform)
almost 10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pedro Lima, PhD, UFC - DEFISIO

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • POdePLima

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprains

Clinical Trials on Experimental MWM

3
Subscribe