Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Method in the Treatment of Shoulder Problems

December 29, 2023 updated by: Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University

Comparison of Conventional Therapy and Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Method in the Treatment of Shoulder Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial

To determine whether Mulligan mobilization with movement (MWM) and Conservative treatment CT give different results on pain, ROM, and functional activities in participants with shoulder problems.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Shoulder problems are one of the common orthopedic problems. Patients with shoulder problems experience an increase in pain and a decrease in joint movement and functionality. With conventional treatment, patients' symptoms improve. However, the MWM is one of the manual therapy techniques frequently used to reduce pain in musculoskeletal system problems. It is extremely important to evaluate patients' functionality after rehabilitation. Although there are studies comparing the effect of MWM in the literature, studies evaluating patient-specific functionality are also limited.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Esenboğa
      • Ankara, Esenboğa, Turkey, 06970
        • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being over 18 years old,
  • Having any shoulder problems (impingement, rotator cuff syndrome, glenohumeral joint problems, etc.),
  • Having a history of shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months, and volunteering to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having systemic or degenerative disease, a neurological disease, and
  • Having more than one upper extremity pathology.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MWM Group
This group received treatment with the Mulligan technique.
The MWM technique was applied to the MWM group in addition to the CT. The MWM technique was applied in flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation directions. The MWM technique was performed with 3 sets of 10 repetitions.
Active Comparator: CT Group
This group received treatment with the conventional therapy.
Cold packs, electrotherapy modalities, scapular mobilization, stretching, and strengthening exercises were applied to the CT group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shoulder pain
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to evaluate shoulder pain. The patient was asked to mark the point corresponding to the pain between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the higher the pain.
through study completion, an average of 6 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ROM
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
Shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation were measured using a Universal goniometer.As the angle increases, the joint range of motion increases.
through study completion, an average of 6 month
Patient Specific Functional Scale
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
In the patient-specific activity scale, depending on the current pathology, the physiotherapist asks the patient three or five activities that he or she finds difficult to do. The patient is asked to score the activity between 0-10 points. The total score is determined by averaging the activity scores, with higher scores indicating better function.
through study completion, an average of 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-962

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on CT+MWM

3
Subscribe