Dry Needling and Pain Education in the Treatment of Chronic Neck Pain

September 5, 2017 updated by: Josue Fernandez Carnero, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Dry Needling and Pain Neuroscience Education in Chronic Pain Patients

to compare the effects on pain, disability and psychological factors of the combination of MTrP dry needling and pain neuroscience education to MTrPs dry needing alone and control electrotherapy usual care in patients with chronic neck pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain, 28702
        • Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mechanical neck pain for at least 12 weeks
  • 10% or higher on the Neck Disability Index questionnaire
  • 20mm or higher on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of neck pain
  • Presence of at least one active myofascial trigger point

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neck pain associated with whiplash injuries
  • Medical red flag history (i.e., tumour, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis)
  • Neck pain with cervical radiculopathy
  • Neck pain associated with externalized cervical disc herniation
  • Fibromyalgia syndrome
  • Previous neck surgery
  • Neck pain accompanied by vertigo caused by vertebrobasilar insufficiency or accompanied by non-cervicogenic headaches

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dry needling
Received Dry needling in the neck muscles.
Insertion of solid filament needles in the muscle
Active Comparator: Conventional treatment
the participants received the conventional treatment for non-specific neck pain.
Electrotherapy: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and microwaves
Experimental: Dry needling and pain neuroscience education
Received the same treatment as dry needling group and pain education.
Insertion of solid filament needles in the muscle
Explanation of the functioning of the central nervous system, the differences between acute pain and chronic pain and the importance of thoughts and beliefs in the processing and chronification of pain

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain using Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Visual Analogue Scale: consists of a line of 100mm which represents the "no pain" on the left side of the same and the "worst pain imaginable" on the right side
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medication intake
Time Frame: 3 months
Medication use: number of pills
3 months
Disability using Neck Disability Index
Time Frame: 3 months
Neck disability index: patients ability to function in daily life activities.
3 months
Kinesiophobia using Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: 3 months
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia: participants pain-related fear of movement and (re)injury
3 months
Catastrophizing using Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain Catastrophizing Scale: propensity to catastrophize about pain
3 months
Pain anxiety using Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale: The anxiety behaviors associated with pain
3 months
Beck Depression Inventory-II
Time Frame: 3 months
Self-report measure to assess the severity of depressive symptoms
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 03/2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Neck

Clinical Trials on Dry needling

3
Subscribe