Influence of Diagnostic Errors on the Prognosis of Acute Pulmonary Embolism (IDEA-PE)

June 1, 2017 updated by: Guy Meyer, European Georges Pompidou Hospital
Diagnostic errors have been reported frequently in patient with pulmonary embolism since symptoms are not specific. However, there is only scarce evidence that the delay associated with diagnostic errors may impact patient prognosis. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of diagnostic errors and if they are associated with more severe pulmonary embolism in term of initial presentation and complications.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

302

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ile de France
      • Paris, Ile de France, France, 75015

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with an episode of first acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and older
  • Episode of symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism objectively proven

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below 18 years of age
  • Patient chronically receiving therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Pulmonary embolism complicating a current hospitalisation for another medical reason
  • Asymptomatic pulmonary embolism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient with a diagnostic error

Defined by one of :

  1. Absence of prescribed test included in an accepted pulmonary diagnosis algorithm in the next 48h00 after the firts contact with a physician
  2. Absence of prescribed test included in an accepted pulmonary diagnosis algorithm by the first contacted physician but the diagnostic is done before 48h00 because the patient went at the emergency room on his own initiative.
  3. More than one doctor consulted before the diagnostic of pulmonary embolism (excluding the emergency physician if the patient was referred by the 1st contact doctor)
There is no intervention in our study. Patient will be managed with usual care. We will divide patients in the 2 groups according to the presence of diagnostic error.
Patient without a diagnostic error
Any patient that did not meet the criteria to define the diagnostic error

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of pulmonary embolism at the time of diagnosis
Time Frame: Day 1
According to the 2014 Europe Society of Cardiology classification that combine clinical characteristics, signs of right ventricular dysfunction on imaging test and cardiac laboratory biomarkers
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complication of pulmonary embolism
Time Frame: Day 30 and 180
Composite of death, shock and recurrence
Day 30 and 180
Frequency of diagnostic errors
Time Frame: Day 1
Frequency of diagnostic errors
Day 1
Characteristic of patient with diagnosis errors
Time Frame: Day 30
Characteristic of patient with diagnosis errors
Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guy Meyer, Pr, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, AP-HP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 11, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Embolism

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic error

3
Subscribe