- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02964039
A Novel Mechanics-based Intervention to Improve Post-stroke Stability
A Novel Mechanics-based Intervention to Improve Post-stroke Gait Stability
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29401-5799
- Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 21 years old
- Experience of a stroke 6 months prior to participation
- Preferred overground gait speed of at least 0.2 m/s
- Ability to walk at self-selected speed for 3 minutes without a cane or walker
- Provision of informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Resting heart rate above 110 beats/min
- Resting blood pressure higher than 200/110 mm Hg
- History of congestive heart failure, unstable cardiac arrhythmias, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, severe aortic stenosis, angina or dyspnea at rest or during activities of daily living
- Preexisting neurological disorders or dementia
- History of major head trauma
- Legal blindness or severe visual impairment
- Life expectancy <1 yr; 8)
- History of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism within 6 months
- Uncontrolled diabetes with recent weight loss, diabetic coma, or frequent insulin reactions
- Orthopedic injuries or conditions (e.g. joint replacements) in the lower extremities with the potential to alter the gait pattern.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Error reduction
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions.
During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "error reduction" mode.
This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period.
Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
During training sessions, a custom-built force-field will exert forces on the legs while participants walk.
These forces will push the legs toward mechanically-appropriate mediolateral locations, having the effect of reducing the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke.
|
|
Experimental: Error augmentation
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions.
During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "error augmentation" mode.
This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period.
Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
During training sessions, a custom-built force-field will exert forces on the legs while participants walk.
These forces will push the legs away from mechanically-appropriate mediolateral locations, having the effect of amplifying the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Activity matched control
Participants will complete a 12-week training program, in which they practice walking on a treadmill for 30-minutes during twice-weekly training sessions.
During these sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field able to exert mediolateral forces on the legs, which will be in "transparent" mode.
This training period will be followed by a 12-week follow-up period.
Five assessment sessions will be interspersed throughout this total 24-week period.
|
During training sessions, participants will interface with a custom-built force-field while they walk.
The force-field will essentially get out of the way, producing minimal forces on the legs, and having no direct effect on the errors in foot placement that are often present among individuals who have experienced a stroke.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Partial Correlation Between Pelvis Displacement and Paretic Step Width During Gait (Change From Baseline)
Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
A custom measure that quantifies the strength of the relationship between body mechanics and foot placement. This measure falls within a relatively narrow range among neurologically intact controls, but is substantially reduced in some individuals who have experienced a stroke, indicating a reduced ability to stabilize their gait pattern. This measure relates the mechanical state of the body at the start of each step (mediolateral pelvis displacement and velocity of the pelvis relative to the stance foot) to the step width at the end of the step. Specifically, the partial linear correlation between pelvis displacement and step width was calculated, accounting for variation in pelvis velocity. The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks). |
baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Gait Assessment (Change From Baseline)
Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
A commonly-used clinical test to quantify balance and stability during various walking tasks. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 30, and higher scores indicate better outcomes. The total maximum value of 30 is calculated as the sum of 10 subscores, each of which has a scoring range of 0-3 and represents a distinct walking task. The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks). |
baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (Change From Baseline)
Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
A commonly-used clinical scale that quantifies an individual's confidence in performing various tasks requiring balance. The minimum value is 0, the maximum value is 100, and higher scores indicate a better outcome. The overall score is calculated as the mean of 16 subscores, each of which can range of 0 to 100 and represents self-efficacy at a distinct movement task. The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks). |
baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
|
10-meter Walk Test (Change From Baseline)
Time Frame: baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
A commonly-used clinical test to quantify general gait function. Walking speed is measured during the middle 6-meter portion of a 10-meter straight line path. The change in this measure relative to baseline is calculated at four time points (after 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks). |
baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks, 12-weeks, 24-weeks
|
|
Fall Incidence
Time Frame: 6 months (during 12 week follow-up period)
|
Self-report history of fall occurrence, quantified by the average number of falls per participant in each group during the 12-week period that followed completion of the study's intervention component
|
6 months (during 12 week follow-up period)
|
|
Fear of Falling
Time Frame: 6 months (at completion of 12-week Follow-up period)
|
Self-report statement of whether a participant has a fear of falling
|
6 months (at completion of 12-week Follow-up period)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jesse C. Dean, PhD, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- N2256-R
- RX002256 (Other Grant/Funding Number: VA ORD)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
-
University Hospital HeidelbergCompletedAcute Ischemic Stroke | Acute Ischemic Stroke AIS | Acute Ischemic Stroke PatientsGermany
Clinical Trials on Error reduction
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabU.S. Department of EducationCompleted
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruitingStroke | Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA)/StrokeUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityThe University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston; University of California... and other collaboratorsCompletedLearning | Adaptive Expertise | Error Management TrainingUnited States
-
Joslin Diabetes CenterJuvenile Diabetes Research FoundationCompleted
-
McGill UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Centre for Interdisciplinary... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCognitive Impairment | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke HemorrhagicCanada
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Peripheral Artery Disease | Transtibial AmputationUnited States
-
European Georges Pompidou HospitalUnknownEmbolism | Pulmonary Embolism | Pulmonary Vascular Disorder | Pulmonary Embolism and Thrombosis | Diagnostic ErrorsFrance
-
University of HaifaTel Aviv University; Ben-Gurion University of the NegevCompleted
-
Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.CompletedMeasurement of Refractive ErrorUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoActive, not recruitingAnorexia NervosaUnited States