Case Management in HCV Infected PWID (CM-HCV)

January 23, 2020 updated by: Geert Robaeys, Hasselt University

Case Management in Hepatitis C Virus Infected People Who Inject Drugs in Belgium

To study the impact of case management on the outcome of the care of chronic hepatitis C in people who inject drugs (PWID). By creating the function of case manager, the investigators will target all the barriers to care of the HCV care continuum. Partial objectives are to measure the impact of case management on the uptake for screening, the uptake and outcome of treatment, and the rate of reinfection.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is nowadays one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease, with prevalence of liver cirrhosis still increasing. The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is primarily transmitted through blood-to-blood contact. In the Western world, overall prevalence of HCV antibodies is low. In Belgium, prevalence of HCV in the general population is estimated around 1% by expert opinion. However, in high-risk populations prevalence of HCV increases. Data for HCV antibody prevalence in Belgium show rates of 60-80% in people who inject drugs (PWID). Populations at increased risk of HCV infection include:

  • PWID
  • recipients of infected blood products or invasive procedures in health-care facilities with inadequate infection control practices (western world: before 1992)
  • children born to mothers infected with HCV
  • people with sexual partners who are HCV-infected
  • people with HIV infection
  • prisoners or previously incarcerated persons
  • people who have used intranasal drugs
  • people who have had tattoos or piercings

Based on international guidelines, the Belgian Association for the Study of the Liver (BASL) recommends targeted screening for these populations to assess HCV prevalence. This is not yet executed in Belgium, despite the severe health and economic burden accompanied with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (CHC). In response to this lacuna in the Belgium health care, the "Hepatitis C Plan (2014-2019)" was developed. This action plan aims to improve the following goals:

  • Uptake for screening in high-risk populations
  • Creation of a national systematic screening procedure
  • Development of an HCV expertise network to improve care and linkage-to-care Furthermore, in April of 2015 the federal government of Belgium distributed a pact with the pharmaceutical industry, called "The Future Pact". This pact between industry and government focuses on accessibility to care, specifically for high-risk groups. Goals are to create a national registry for therapy and develop patient support programs, next to the expansion of reimbursement of therapy for HCV infection in fibrosis stadium II. However, despite the international guidelines and despite the strategic aims in the Hepatitis C plan and the Future Pact, no specific actions are described, and screening is not systematically executed in high-risk groups in Belgium.

The importance of this screening cannot be underestimated as HCV is now curable, with success rates of 60-100% according to other associated factors (e.g. use of direct acting antivirals (DAAs), severity of liver disease, HCV genotype, resistance). Furthermore, different studies state that treatment of patients with CHC in an early stage has the potential to be cost-effective, as hospitalization costs after development of liver disease far exceed the cost of antiviral therapy. Nonetheless, treatment uptake also remains low.

One of the reasons why PWIDs were excluded from treatment in the past was stigmatization based on greater risk of reinfection. Latest studies show low rates of reinfection among PWID, even with continued injection drug use during and after treatment. The pooled HCV reinfection risk was 2.4 per 100 person years, combined for six studies, across the UK, Australia, the Netherlands and Greece, suggesting that HCV treatment should not be withheld due to concerns about reinfection alone. However, with ongoing risk behaviour, current guidelines recommend monitoring with annual HCV RNA assessments. Furthermore, data from the National Scottish Hepatitis C Clinical Database show that an increasing significant minority of PWID continue to inject post-SVR at an intensity which leads to either hospitalisation or death and increased risk of reinfection. Thus, harm reduction and counselling remain necessary.

With this trial, the investigators want to evaluate a possible approach to reach the different goals defined in the Hepatitis C plan and the future pact. The investigators will study the impact of case management on the outcome of care for HCV infected PWID in Belgium.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

441

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium, 3590
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • History of injection drug use with substitution program
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Possible acute HCV infection within the previous 6 months defined by one of the following: acute hepatitis symptoms, ALT ≥ 10x ULN, negative or unknown HCV antibody status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: history of injection drug use

Men and women ≥ 18 years old with a history of injection drug use, enrolled in the opiate substitution program of CAD Limburg.

Case management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uptake for screening (%)
Time Frame: screening
percentage of clients screened in relation to number of clients in follow-up at CAD
screening
Uptake for treatment assessment (%)
Time Frame: day 1
percentage of HCV positive clients who attented a hepatology consultation in relation of total of HCV positive clients
day 1
Uptake for treatment (%)
Time Frame: day 1
percentage of HCV positive clients who started treatment in relation of total of HCV positive clients needing treatment
day 1
Compliance to therapy (%)
Time Frame: up to three years
percentage of patients reaching end-of treatment response, who present at the consultation, in relation to total patients in treatment
up to three years
Rate of sustained viral response (SVR) (%)
Time Frame: up to three years
percentage of patients who clear the hepatitis C virus in relation to total patients treated
up to three years
Rate of reinfection (%)
Time Frame: up to three years
percentage of patients who get reinfected with HCV in relation to total cured patients
up to three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rob Bielen, drs., Hasselt University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZOL-CM-HCV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Drug Abuse, Intravenous

Clinical Trials on case management

3
Subscribe