- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03107715
Prenatal Interventions to Promote Exclusive Breastfeeding
Assessing the Feasibility of a Breastfeeding Champion Intervention and a Positive Messaging Module During the Prenatal Period - a Pilot
Background: Exclusive breastfeeding through age 6 months is the optimal infant feeding method due to lifesaving benefits for children and mothers (AAP, others). Exclusive breastfeeding in-hospital is critical because in-hospital formula supplementation doubles risk of non-exclusive breastfeeding at 30-60 days (Chantry et al, 2014). While breastfeeding initiation rates have increased at our inner-city Baby Friendly - designated maternity hospital, exclusive breastfeeding lags. CDC mPINC data (maternity practices in infant nutrition and care, 2015) demonstrate this is a national problem, with >50% of surveyed hospitals endorsing supplementation of "10-49%" of breastfed infants.
Study Objective: The study objective is to evaluate acceptance/satisfaction of 2 prenatal interventions (breastfeeding champion and positive messaging) and to determine if these affect exclusive breastfeeding intention and practice.
Methods: In this prospective intervention study with follow-up chart review, we will pilot two 5-minute-long iPad-based interventions for 1 month each in obstetrical clinics, following a required 28-week obstetrical visit breastfeeding education. All expectant mothers (including 14-17 year olds with guardian) are eligible. Outcomes are acceptance (enrollment rate), satisfaction (Likert-based), impact on exclusive breastfeeding intention (pre/post query) and secondarily impact on exclusive breastfeeding in-hospital and at 2 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Relevance:
This research is aligned with efforts to decrease infant mortality and associated racial disparities via culturally competent interventions, and our aim is that it will be possible to model a larger intervention trial using the data generated in this pilot study. The project showcases work which is clinically meaningful, addresses an important racial health disparity in a vulnerable population (predominantly African-American expectant women) and is allied with hospital quality measures (PC-05, exclusive breastfeeding in hospital).
Background:
Exclusive breastfeeding through age 6 months is the optimal infant feeding method due to lifesaving benefits for children and mothers (AAP, others). Exclusive breastfeeding in-hospital is critical because in-hospital formula supplementation doubles risk of non-exclusive breastfeeding at 30-60 days (Chantry et al, 2014). While breastfeeding initiation rates have increased at our inner-city Baby Friendly - designated maternity hospital, exclusive breastfeeding lags. CDC mPINC data (maternity practices in infant nutrition and care, 2015) demonstrate this is a national problem, with >50% of surveyed hospitals endorsing supplementation of "10-49%" of breastfed infants.
Study Objective and Aims:
The study objective is to evaluate acceptance/satisfaction of 2 prenatal interventions (breastfeeding champion and positive messaging) and to determine if these affect exclusive breastfeeding intention and practice.
Study Aims are "1." To determine if intention to exclusively breastfeed changes from before to after the intervention is implemented "2." To determine the acceptance and satisfaction of the interventions "3." To determine and compare the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in-hospital and at 2-weeks postpartum among women who received the champion and positive messaging interventions
Methods:
Study Design: The study is a pretest-posttest sequential group design chosen to evaluate the effect of two prenatal breastfeeding interventions on exclusive breastfeeding intention. Intervention A (Breastfeeding Champion) and Intervention B (Positive Messaging) will be administered during months 1 and 2, respectively, of the study.
Population and Setting: The setting is University Hospitals MacDonald Women's Hospital, an academic tertiary care birthing center in urban Cleveland, OH with approximately 3,800 deliveries per year. The eligible population includes expectant women ages 14 years and up (with guardian present if ages 14-17 years) who are attending a prenatal visit at an on-site clinic and have completed required breastfeeding education presented at or before 28 weeks of gestation. The clinics serve a predominantly African-American WIC-eligible population.
Interventions: Both interventions use a secured and protected iPad, and the total interaction with the participant will take about 10 minutes. Intervention A utilizes information about Breastfeeding Champions from the Coffective™ program: participants will be guided to tap and scroll through the content and will receive a follow up handout and encouragement to select a Champion. Intervention B utilizes positive messaging from several sources and is modelled on the WIC Loving Support™ approach: participants will click on (istock-purchased) photographs which each reveal an informational statement about exclusive breastfeeding benefits and tips, followed by receipt of a summary handout.
Data Collection: After informed consent is obtained, sociodemographic information and a pretest to include feeding intention will be administered. Then following the 5-8 minute iPad-based intervention, a short posttest will be administered, which asks a Likert based question about intervention satisfaction and about feeding intention post-intervention. Postpartum, actual feeding method in hospital and at 2 weeks will be gathered by chart review. REDCap will be utilized for data entry.
Outcome Measures: These will reflect the aims:
"1." Intention to exclusively breastfeed post-intervention "2." Likert-based satisfaction with intervention received "3." Rates of exclusive breastfeeding in-hospital and at 2 weeks post-partum
Data Collection Tools: These were created by the study team.
Data analysis and Sample Size considerations:
Sample size - Aim #1 of the study is to determine if intention to exclusively breastfeed changes from before to after the interventions are implemented. There are no published data on this question utilizing these interventions with which to formulate a hypothesis and perform the requisite sample size to test that hypothesis. This will be considered a hypothesis generating study and feasibility of enrollment will determine the sample size. We will approach all eligible women during 2-month study period. We anticipate that approximately 31 women per week will be eligible, of whom approximately 80% will agree to participate, and over a 2-month study period, 250 women could be enrolled.
Data analysis - Nominal variables will be described using frequencies and percentages. Normally distributed continuous variables will be described using means and standard deviations, and non-normally distributed continuous variables will be described using medians and IQRs (interquartile ranges). We will compare nominal variables, e.g. those who received differing interventions (champion versus positive messaging) using Chi squared analyses or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Distributionally appropriate two-sample tests will be used to compare continuous variables. Additional analyses may be carried out as the data indicate, and will be considered exploratory.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- University Hospital MacDonald Women's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Expectant women receiving prenatal care at UH MacDonald Women's Health Clinic or MAC1200 CLinic
- Completed required breastfeeding education presented at or before 28 weeks of gestation
- Age 14 - 17 years must have guardian/parent present who consents to teen participation, and teen must then assent to participation
- Ages 18 years and older must consent to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Medical indication for use of formula only after delivery including HIV+ or will require chemotherapy treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Breastfeeding Champion
The Breastfeeding Champion Intervention (Intervention A) utilizes information about Breastfeeding Champions from the Coffective™ program: participants will be guided to tap and scroll through the content and will receive a follow up handout and encouragement to select a Champion.
|
iPad-based behavioral intervention facilitated by researcher
|
|
Active Comparator: Positive Messaging
The Positive Messaging Intervention (Intervention B) utilizes positive messaging from several sources and is modelled on the WIC Loving Support™ approach: participants will click on (istock-purchased) photographs which each reveal an informational statement about exclusive breastfeeding benefits and tips, followed by receipt of a summary handout.
|
iPad based behavioral intervention facilitated by researcher
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Intended to Exclusively Breastfeed Post-intervention
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Single query "How do you plan to feed your baby?" with 4 possible responses Just formula / Both breastmilk and formula / Just breastmilk / Unsure
|
15 minutes
|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Their Intervention as "Very Interesting" (Response=5) on a 5 Point Likert Scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes
|
Single 5 point Likert scale with query "Was the intervention you received interesting and enjoyable?"
Analyzed as all those who said 5 "very interesting" on a 5 point Likert scale; higher score indicates the participant liked/was more interested in the intervention; minimum score =1, maximum score = 5; No scale title - Question was: Was the intervention you received interesting and enjoyable?
Please give us your overall impression on a scale from 1-5!
|
15 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Exclusively Breastfed In-hospital
Time Frame: 2 days
|
Was infant fed breastmilk only in-hospital postpartum (yes/no)
|
2 days
|
|
Number of Participants Who Exclusively Breastfed at 2 Weeks Postpartum
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Was infant fed breastmilk only at 2 weeks postpartum (yes/no)
|
2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca Farr, BSE, CWRU SOM
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 04-17-04
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Health Behavior
-
Holbaek SygehusCompletedHealth Behavior | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Health LiteracyDenmark
-
Penn State UniversityCompletedBehavior, HealthUnited States
-
Henry Ford Health SystemUniversity of Kansas; University of Maryland, College ParkActive, not recruiting
-
Istinye UniversityRecruitingHealth-Related BehaviorTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyHealth and Human Services Commission (HHSC); Pharr-San Juan-Alamo Independent... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of PrimorskaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences; Ministry of Defence, SloveniaActive, not recruitingHealth-Related BehaviorSlovenia
-
Boston Children's HospitalAllan & Gill Gray FoundationCompletedSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
University of LisbonRecruitingOral Health Behavior Change | Oral Health Care | Oral Health Self-efficacyPortugal
-
Boston Children's HospitalRecruitingSleep | Health-Related BehaviorUnited States
-
Universiti Teknologi MaraUniversiti Putra Malaysia; Ministry of Health, Malaysia; Institute for Health... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHealth Attitude | Health Behavior | Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | Health-Related Behavior | Behavior, Health | Attitude to Health | Preparedness | OutbreaksMalaysia
Clinical Trials on Breastfeeding Champion
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingHIV | Methamphetamine Use Disorder | PrEP AdherenceUnited States
-
Memorial University of NewfoundlandCompleted
-
University of VirginiaJohns Hopkins University; Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUnknownDecision Support TechniquesUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); University of South CarolinaCompleted
-
Duke UniversityAmgenRecruiting
-
Massachusetts General HospitalPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingAsthma in Children | Obesity, Childhood | Overweight, ChildhoodUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompleted
-
Mount Sinai Hospital, CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Active, not recruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingDepression | AnxietyMalawi
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalActive, not recruitingMild Cognitive Impairment | Subjective Cognitive Decline | Dementia, Mild | At Risk for Cognitive DeclineUnited States