Applications of Dual Energy CT in Patients With Osseous Metastases From Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer

January 4, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Applications of Dual Energy CT for Improving Staging and Monitoring of Therapy Response in Patients With Osseous Metastases From Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer

The purpose of this study is to establish a more accurate and precise way to image (take pictures of) metastatic bone disease in patients with prostate cancer for staging and monitoring response to therapy. More specifically, the study aims to evaluate the capabilities of dual energy CT as a more precise and accurate tool for staging and monitoring of therapy response in patients with osseous metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Bone metastases in prostate cancer patients are a clinical and diagnostic challenge to image. Sometimes very small metastatic bone lesions may only become detectable by imaging in response to therapy due to increased bone deposition during the first three months after therapy. Commonly used imaging tests (such as regular CT or bone scan) are unable to reliably tell the difference between increased bone deposition (therapy response) and growth of the lesion (progressive disease). This diagnostic challenge may have profound negative effects on patient management since it may require additional imaging before an accurate determination of tumor response can be made. An appropriate determination of tumor response is needed for appropriate management of prostate cancer. The investigators anticipate that the new imaging tested in this study (called dual energy CT) may provide additional critical information in this clinical and diagnostic challenge.

Approximately 100 people with prostate cancer and metastatic bone disease will take part in this study. At enrollment, three months, and six months, they will will receive a non-enhanced (without contrast) dual energy CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis before receiving their routine, clinical contrast-enhanced CT scan.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Oncology patients with castrate-resistant prostate cancer planned for therapy with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide and prednisolone undergoing clinically indicated MDCT (multi-detector computed tomography) of the chest, abdomen and pelvis
  2. > 18 years old
  3. Serum creatinine < 2.0
  4. BMI < 35kg/m^2
  5. Sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

- History of anaphylactoid reaction to iodinated contrast material

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT)
This is a single-arm study. Each patient will receive an unenhanced dual energy CT scan followed by a contrast-enhanced scan as part of clinical routine work up. No change in the contrast material injection protocol will be performed for this this study.

The subject's diagnostic scan will be preceded by a not clinically indicated non enhanced dual energy scan. The overall radiation dose to the patient for the first and second acquisition will be twice the radiation dose of a conventional CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. The non enhanced dual energy scan will be repeated during a clinical follow-up after the subject's first three months of enrollment and at a clinical follow-up after six months of enrollment.

The clinically-indicated, contrast-enhanced diagnostic scan will be performed according to standard of care.

Other Names:
  • DECT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Differentiate Between Therapy Response and Progression of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Sensitivity of Imaging Approach
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Specificity of Imaging Approach
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Accuracy of Imaging Approach
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease.
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
To analyze the feasibility to detect bone metastasis at baseline more accurately, unenhanced bone marrow imaging will be calculated and additional dual energy based, calcium corrected iodine maps will be used to determine a threshold for detection of vital bone metastasis in order to calculate color coded bone maps for risk of presence of bone metastases.
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Reader Performance for Iodine Maps and Fused Images to Diagnose Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose of Metastatic Bone Disease
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Sensitivity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Specificity of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Accuracy of Optimal Threshold for Iodine Uptake to Diagnose Metastatic Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)
Feasibility of monitoring metastatic bone disease in prostate cancer patients
Duration of CT scan (approximately 5 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00078046

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Dual Energy Computed Tomography

Subscribe