- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03113981
Osseointegration of THA Grafted by PolyNASS (ACTISURF-CERAFIT® ) Versus Non-grafted THA (CERAFIT®)
Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial Assessing the Osseointegration of THA Grafted by Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate -PolyNASS- (ACTISURF-CERAFIT® ) Versus Non-grafted THA (CERAFIT®)
The infection rate after Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is about 1%. It is a serious condition, with high morbidity, sometimes fatal, requiring costly treatment.
The treatment is difficult because "biofilm" forms very early after the bacterial contamination of the prosthesis.
Prevent infection means reduce or prevent the formation of bacterial biofilm and controlling protein response to allow osseous-integration of the prosthesis.
A new prosthesis was developped, grafted by PolyNaSS (polysodium styrenesulfonate). This bioactive polymer allows to substantially reduce bacterial adhesion and increase biocompatibility and bio-integration in preclinical studies. This first clinical study aims to compare the osseous-integration of this prosthesis to the same prothesis with no grafting.
No previous clinical trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bordeaux, France, 33076
- CHU de Bordeaux Site Pellegrin
-
Boulogne-Billancourt, France, 92000
- Hôpital Ambroise Paré
-
Brest, France, 29200
- CH Privé Brestois et Clinique Pasteur
-
Brest, France, 29200
- CHU Cavale Blanche
-
Paris, France, 75010
- Hopital Lariboisière
-
Quimper, France, 29107
- CH de Cornouaille
-
Strasbourg, France, 67200
- HUS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged over 50 and under 75 years OR aged under 50 years with joint lesions not amenable to successful conservative treatment.
- THA following a primary or secondary osteoarthritis
- THA following an aseptic osteonecrosis
- THA following a rapidly destructive osteoarthritis
- Social insurance
- Informed and signed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients younger than 50 years and with joint lesions that can be successfully treated with conservative treatment
- Inflammatory rheumatism
- Long-term corticosteroid treatment
- Tumor Pathology of the hip bone
- Study femoral stem not adapted to the patient's anatomy (verified on preoperative X-rays using Ceraver templates).
- Loss of bone of the joint that makes it impossible to properly anchor a cementless prosthesis
- Acetabular or femoral bone graft associated
- Infectious hip arthritis history
- Evolving infection of the articulation or peri-articular region involved, including severe neuroarthropathy
- Surgical history on the affected hip
- Allergy known to any component of prostheses
- Known hypersensitivity to polystyrene sulfonate resins
- Native cotyl with a diameter of less than 42mm or greater than 68mm
- Significant muscle loss, neuromuscular injury or vascular insufficiency of affected limb
- Charcot's disease
- Immunocompromised patients
- Difficulties of follow-up (departure on vacation, imminent change, geographical distance, patients not residing in metropolis, insufficient motivation) or understanding of the protocol
- Patient Refusal
- Pregnant and lactating women
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ACTISURF-CERAFIT
Total hip arthroplasty (CERAFIT) grafted by PolyNass
|
Implanting THA grafted with PolyNass or not
|
|
Active Comparator: CERAFIT
Total hip arthroplasty (CERAFIT) with HydroxyApatite (HA) not grafted by PolyNass
|
Implanting THA grafted with PolyNass or not
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Osseous-integration of the femoral stem and the acetabular component
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery for both groups
|
(Yes/No). THA will be judged "osseointegrated" if the acetabulum AND the femur meet the following osseous-integration criteria:
|
1 year post-surgery for both groups
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mid-term survival rate of the hip prosthesis
Time Frame: 15 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group and 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group
|
Based on the unipolar or bipolar change of the femoral head regardless of the cause, septic or mechanical.
|
15 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group and 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group
|
|
Score ARA femur of Epinette
Time Frame: 1 year post-surgery for both groups
|
Adaptation criteria of the bone to the cementless stem
|
1 year post-surgery for both groups
|
|
Hip prosthesis infection rate defined according to the 2011 criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS). In case of suspicion of infection, a hip joint aspiration with synovial fluid culture will be performed.
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery for both groups
|
yes/no
|
2 years post-surgery for both groups
|
|
Postel Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
From 18 (perfect) to 0 (worst)
|
2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
|
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
10 question items and scores range from 0-100 with higher scores representing less dysfunction and better outcomes.
|
2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
|
Forgotten Hip Score (FHS)
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
12 question items and scores range from 0-100 with higher scores representing a forgotten hip (excellent)
|
2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5, 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
|
Osseous-integration of the femoral stem and the acetabular component based on radiographies
Time Frame: 2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5 and 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
Subsidence of the femoral stem, presence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines in the Gruen and Amstutz zones (femur) and in the DeLee and Charnley zones (acetabulum), Brooker score
|
2 years post-surgery for both groups. 5 and 10 years post-surgery for CERAFIT group. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group.
|
|
THA survival
Time Frame: 6 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group. 10 years post-surgery for both groups.
|
Event=THA revision (change of the stem or acetabular component) whatever the reason (infectious or mechanical failure)
|
6 years post-surgery for ACTISURF group. 10 years post-surgery for both groups.
|
|
Adverse and serious adverse events evaluation
Time Frame: For ACTISURF group: at 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery. For CERAFIT group: at 5, 10, and 15 years post-surgery.
|
Occurrence of related to THA serious adverse events after 2 post-operative years
|
For ACTISURF group: at 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 years post-surgery. For CERAFIT group: at 5, 10, and 15 years post-surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Bauer, MD, PhD, Hospital Ambroise Paré Paris
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Genital Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Neoplasms
- Arthritis
- Joint Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Necrosis
- Neoplastic Processes
- Osteoarthritis
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Infertility
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Osteonecrosis
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Arthroplasty, Replacement
- Arthroplasty
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Plastic Surgery Procedures
- Prosthesis Implantation
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Other Study ID Numbers
- ACTISURF-OI-16
- 2015-A01919-40 (Other Identifier: ID RCB - ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Hip
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesRecruitingHip Pain Chronic | Hip Osteoarthritis | Hip ArthropathyPoland
-
University of MiamiNot yet recruiting
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingHip Osteoarthritis | Arthropathy of HipPoland
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesRecruitingHip Pain Chronic | Hip OsteoarthritisPoland
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingHip Osteoarthritis | Arthropathy of HipPoland
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompleted
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesRecruiting
-
Tulip MedicineCompletedRehabilitation | Hip Osteoarthritis | Hip Arthroplasty Replacement | Hip Arthroplasty, TotalKazakhstan
-
Poznan University of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingHip Osteoarthritis
-
Artvin Coruh UniversityCompletedHip OsteoarthritisTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.Active, not recruitingAdvanced Degeneration of the Hip Joint | Revision of the Hip JointUnited States, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong
-
Suzhou MicroPort OrthoRecon Co. LTDCompleted
-
University of ConnecticutCompletedOsteo Arthritis Knee | Hip Osteoarthritis | Protein-Energy Malnutrition | Orthopedic | Energy Malnutrition ProteinUnited States
-
Istituto Clinico HumanitasCompleted
-
Orthopedic Hospital Vienna SpeisingCompletedTotal Hip ArthroplastyAustria
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedObesity | ArthropathyTurkey
-
DePuy OrthopaedicsTerminatedOsteoarthritis | Degenerative Arthritis | Revision ArthroplastyCanada
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsCompleted
-
Western University, CanadaRecruiting
-
Zimmer BiometTerminatedJoint Diseases | Osteoarthritis, Hip | Avascular Necrosis of Hip | Congenital Dysplasia of the Hip | Degenerative Joint Disease of Hip | Rheumatoid Arthritis of Hip | Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis of HipCanada