A Study in Patients With Mild or Moderate Ulcerative Colitis Who Take a TNF Inhibitor. The Study Investigates Whether Bowel Inflammation Improves When Patients Take BI 655130 in Addition to Their Current Therapy

October 8, 2025 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Proof-of-concept Study of BI 655130 add-on Treatment in Patients With Mild-to-moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis During TNF Inhibitor Therapy

The objectives of this trial are safety and efficacy (proof-of-concept) of induction of mucosal healing by BI 655130 add-on therapy in patients with mild or moderate ulcerative colitis and persisting endoscopic activity despite pre-existing TNFi treatment.

This trial will explore safety and efficacy of a dose of BI 655130 that was modelled to achieve the similar exposures as the highest exposures tested and found safe and tolerable in preceding single and multiple dose studies in healthy subjects, as add-on to pre-existing TNFi (Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) treatment. Secondary and further objectives include assessment of the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of BI 655130 and early exploration of specific biomarkers with potential usefulness to predict clinical efficacy or safety outcome or help understand BI 655130's mode of action.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9100
        • Aalborg Sygehus Syd
      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
        • Sanos Clinic
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
      • Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany, 79106
        • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
      • Hanover, Germany, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
      • Ulm, Germany, 89081
        • Universitätsklinikum Ulm
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC, locatie AMC
      • Lørenskog, Norway, N-1478
        • Akershus Universitetssykehus HF
      • Majadahonda, Spain, 28222
        • Hospital Puerta de Hierro
      • Santander, Spain, 39008
        • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Hospital Politècnic La Fe
      • Leeds, United Kingdom, LS9 7TF
        • St James's University Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9RT
        • Guy's Hospital
      • Prescot, United Kingdom, L35 5DR
        • Whiston Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 - 75 years at screening and randomisation
  • Diagnosis of ulcerative colitis >= 5 months prior to screening
  • Receiving TNFi treatment with doses (i.e. dose and dosing interval) unchanged for >= 4 months (Infliximab) or >= 2 Monaten (Adalimumab or Golimumab) prior to randomisation
  • Mild or moderate disease activity, defined as total Mayo Score (MCS) (<= 10)
  • Further inclusion criteria apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior use of more than two different TNF inhibitors or vedolizumab
  • Extensive colonic resection
  • Evidence of infection with C. difficile or other intestinal pathogen <28 days prior to screening
  • Active or latent tuberculosis
  • Further exclusion criteria apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spesolimab
1200 milligrams (mg) of Spesolimab (BI 655130) were administered every 4 weeks (q4w) via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment (3 injections of Spesolimab 1200 mg in total during the 12 weeks: at Week 0, 4, and 8 respectively).
12 weeks treatment
Other Names:
  • BI 655130
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Matching placebo was administered via intravenous infusion over 12 weeks of treatment.
12 weeks treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement (MCS mESS ≤1) at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12
Proportion of participants with endoscopic improvement (Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤1) at Week 12 was reported. The endoscopic improvement (mucosal healing) was defined as the Mayo clinical score (MCS) modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1 point. The MCS mESS ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). The mESS was assessed by a central reader who was independent from the investigator. The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.
At Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants With Total Clinical Remission (tCR) Based on Total Mayo Clinical Score at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12

Proportion of participants with total clinical remission based on total Mayo clinical score at Week 12 was reported. The total clinical remission based on total Mayo clinical score was defined as the total Mayo clinical score ≤ 2 points and all sub-scores ≤ 1 point.

The total Mayo clinical score was a composite disease activity score consisting of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total Mayo score was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease.

The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

At Week 12
Proportion of Participants With Histological Remission at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12

Proportion of participants with histological remission at Week 12 was reported. The histological remission was defined as the Robarts histology index score ≤ 6.

The Robarts histopathology index (RHI) was a histologic activity score, scoring the components chronic inflammatory infiltrate, lamina propria neutrophils, neutrophils in epithelium and erosion or ulceration on a scale of 0 to 3. The 4 components were weighted differently to calculate the RHI, with RHI = 1 × chronic inflammatory infiltrate level + 2 × lamina propria neutrophils + 3 × neutrophils in epithelium + 5 × erosion or ulceration. The resulting RHI score ranged from 0 (no disease activity) to 33 (severe disease activity).

The 95% confidence intervals (in descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

At Week 12
Proportion of Participants With Clinical Remission (CR) Based on Mayo Clinical Score at Week 12
Time Frame: At Week 12

Proportion of participants with clinical remission (CR) based on Mayo clinical score at Week 12 was reported. The clinical remission based on Mayo clinical score was defined as the total Mayo clinical Score ≤ 2 and Rectal Bleeding Subscore = 0, Stool Frequency Score =0 or 1 and drop ≥ 1 from baseline, and Modified endoscopic sub-score (mESS) ≤ 1.

The total Mayo clinical score was a composite disease activity score consisting of 4 sub-scores: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment, and modified endoscopic appearance. Each sub-score ranged from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease/worse disease status). The total Mayo clinical score was by summing up the four sub-scores and ranged from 0 to 12 with higher score indicating worse disease.

The 95% confidence intervals (in the descriptive statistics part) were calculated using the method of Wilson.

At Week 12
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first does of study medication until end of the follow-up period, up to 36 weeks.
Number of participants with any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported.
From first does of study medication until end of the follow-up period, up to 36 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents. Exceptions might apply, e.g. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (in case of low number of patients and therefore limitations with anonymization).

For more details refer to: https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datatransparency

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colitis, Ulcerative

Clinical Trials on Spesolimab

Subscribe