Defining Displacement Thresholds for Surgical Intervention for Distal Radius Fractures - a Delphi Study

January 29, 2020 updated by: University of Leicester

Wrist (distal radius fractures) are very common injuries. Despite this there is still much controversy about the best way to treat them and in particular which ones require intervention. Many studies have been carried out but there is no strong evidence to answer these questions. The investigators are carrying out a Delphi study which involves seeking consensus from experts at treating these injuries about the best way to manage them. UK and international expert surgeons will take part in three rounds of online questionnaires to help decide how much displacement of the fracture will trigger treatment for different common wrist fracture cases. The aim of the study is to obtain expert opinion through consensus from the expert group about the amount of displacement that is acceptable until intervention is required.

This will provide guidance and reduce variation between treating surgeons.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The investigators conducted a systematic review following SIGN guidelines with the British Society for Surgery of the Hand(BSSH) blue book committee looking at the relationship between measured radiological parameters and functional outcome. 42 studies were identified all of which were of low quality. The conclusion was; 'Currently there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate an association between any measured radiological parameters and patient rated outcome. Further high quality research is required to answer this question.' The review identified that the most commonly measured parameters were radial height, radial inclination, volar tilt and intra articular step and gap.

The Delphi process involves seeking consensus from renowned experts to provide an answer to specific research questions. Through this Delphi study the investigators intend to investigate and achieve consensus regarding the threshold for intervention in displaced distal radius fractures. The aim is to quantify how much displacement can be accepted before intervention is required for different patient groups. This can then help guide surgeons with their management decisions and help reduce variation.

A three round modified Delphi process will be used. Identified experts will be sent an invitation email with an attached electronic form which they will be asked to fill in and return to indicate if they wish to take part.

Invitation emails will be sent on the same day to all experts and they will be given 14 days to return the acceptance form.

The first round will start 14 days after the invitation email is sent. The first round electronic survey link will simultaneously be emailed to all participants who have agreed to take part. After seven days, a second e-mail (reminder) will be sent to the participants who do not respond to the first invitation. On the 15th day, responses for the first round will be collected. The investigators will analyse the collected responses and the level of agreement in the responses will be assessed.

The second round will be conducted 14 days after the first round is finalised and analysed. Only the responders who take part in the first round will be invited. The participants will be given the information about the results of the first round ,the methodology used and a review of the literature. Reminder e-mails will be sent on the 7th day, concluding the second round at 15th day. The second round results will be evaluated using the same method as that for the first round. The format of the third round (if required due to persistent disagreement) will be similar to that of the second round. Consensus is defined as 70% agreement between participants

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Experienced expert surgeons who regularly treat patients with distal radius fractures and/or have researched the subject extensively will be invited to take part. All participants will be aged over 18 years.

The investigators defined experts in 3 ways:

  1. - experienced hand and wrist surgeons who are members of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand.
  2. - trauma surgeons who deal with these injuries and operate on them regularly.
  3. - surgeons who are also researchers who have published studies investigating outcome in patients with distal radius fractures in the last 5 years so have a comprehensive understanding of the nature of the injury and likely outcome.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Experienced expert surgeons who regularly treat patients with distal radius fractures and/or have researched the subject extensively

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Excluded if not an experienced specialist surgeon

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Delphi panel
Group of expert surgeons who have experience dealing with distal radius fractures No intervention will be performed on a patient. Participants will discuss and aim to obtain agreement about best treatment options for a variety of cases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agreement on questions from expert panel
Time Frame: 10 weeks
Agreement is defined as a consensus of 70% between expert panel members
10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nick A Johnson, MBCHB, University of Leicester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 28, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0593

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Distal Radius Fracture

3
Subscribe