Vaginal Practices in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Positive Women in Zambia, a Bio-Behavioral Intervention "WASH-2"

April 28, 2017 updated by: Maria Alcaide, University of Miami
Intravaginal practices (IVP) (cleansing or introducing products inside the vagina for hygiene, health or to please sexual partners) are common among women with HIV. IVP increase the risk of developing bacterial Vaginosis (BV), the most common genital infection associated with transmission of sexually transmitted infections and HIV. This study tested a pilot intervention to reduce IVP and BV in HIV infected women in Zambia. A total of 128 HIV infected women engaging in IVP were randomized to two conditions: enhanced standard of care (n = 70) and experimental (n = 58). All participants received a brief educational counseling session on discontinuation of IVP, and those with BV, were provided with medical treatment for BV. Women in the experimental condition received an additional group-based, culturally tailored intervention. Participants completed questionnaires assessing sexual risk factors and IVP and were assessed for BV using Nugent criteria at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Zambia has high rates of women of childbearing age infected with Human Immune Deficiency Virus (HIV). The majority (93%) engage in intravaginal practices (here referred to as IVP) by internal cleansing (intravaginal cleansing) or by inserting products inside the vagina (intravaginal insertion). IVP are culturally driven practices associated with an increased risk of HIV transmission and may play an important role in exacerbating the HIV epidemic across sub-Saharan Africa.

This application proposes to 1) evaluate the long term impact of a bio-behavioral intervention targeting VP among HIV infected women (n=128) in Lusaka, Zambia, and 2) assess the relative contributions of VP and bacterial vaginosis (BV) to lower genital tract inflammation and HIV shedding. Study aims will address the following:

Aim 1. To develop and evaluate the long term impact of a culturally tailored bio-behavioral intervention aimed to decrease IVP in HIV positive women and evaluate the relative contribution of IVP and BV to lower genital inflammation and shedding of HIV.

Aim 1.1. To develop and evaluate the long term impact of a bio-behavioral intervention to decrease IVP.

Intra vaginal practices, as culturally driven and condoned behaviors, are difficult to modify. It is hypothesized that a culturally tailored bio-behavioral intervention is needed to decrease IVP, and that women participating in the intervention condition will reduce IVP in comparison with women in a time matched control condition. Experimental approach: Women engaging in IVP will be randomly assigned to one of two conditions (intervention or control). IVP will be evaluated and compared over 12 months.

Aim 1.2. To compare rates of BV, lower genital tract inflammatory markers and HIV shedding in HIV infected women engaging in VP with and without BV.

Due to the close relationship between IVP and BV, it is difficult to determine the relative contribution of each to lower genital tract inflammation and HIV shedding. It is hypothesized that women engaging in IVP with BV will have similar levels of both lower genital tract inflammatory cytokines and HIV viral load to those without BV. Experimental approach: Vaginal secretions and cervicovaginal fluid will be collected from women engaging in IVP. The presence of BV, inflammatory cytokines (IL-6 and IL-8), and HIV RNA will be determined by gram stain, ELISA and PCR techniques respectively, and compared in women that engage in IVP with and without BV.

Aim 1.3. To compare BV, lower genital inflammatory markers and shedding of HIV in HIV seropositive women participating in the intervention versus control condition.

Interventions to decrease IVP have the goal of reducing BV and associated adverse health outcomes. It is hypothesized that the bio-behavioral intervention will decrease BV, lower genital tract inflammation and HIV shedding. Experimental approach: Laboratory assessments used for Aim 1.2 will be repeated and compared at baseline, 6 and 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Lusaka, Zambia
        • University Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women recruited
  • Living with HIV-1 infection
  • At least 18 years of age,
  • Receiving antiretroviral therapy
  • Intravaginal practices
  • Vaginal intercourse with men in the month prior to enrolment
  • Living in the Lusaka metropolitan area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant
  • Being on hormonal contraception
  • Having an intrauterine device (IUD) in place to avoid the potential for induced changes in inflammatory cytokines in the genital mucosa due to contraception.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental condition
The WASH (Women's and Sexual Health) intervention included the elements of the enhanced standard of care condition and in addition, a group-based, culturally-tailored intervention to enhance the uptake of the recommendations. Facilitators covered an intervention manual on risks associated with IVP, symptoms of vaginal infections, vaginal health, women's experience with alternative methods for vaginal care, and communication with partners about vaginal health and the risks associated with IVP.
The WASH was a group-based, 45-minute group session on vaginal health and healthy vaginal practices led by two trained facilitators. The sessions covered topics related to vaginal practices and the potential harm of vaginal practices.
Other Names:
  • WASH
OTHER: Enhanced Standard of Care
This study provided an "enhanced standard of care" (SOC+) comparison condition, consisting of a genital tract examination, collection of a vaginal swab with gram stain of vaginal secretions, diagnosis of BV using the Nugent criteria and provision of medication (oral metronidazole) within 48 hours of the examination in women with Nugent score of 7-10, regardless of the presence of symptoms. In addition, at baseline, participants received an individual education session on the risk of engaging in IVP, advice to discontinue IVP, and tips for healthy vaginal hygiene, emphasizing avoiding IVP and suggesting replacing IVP by external vaginal cleansing.
The "enhanced standard of care" (SOC+) condition received a genital tract examination, collection of a vaginal swab with gram stain of vaginal secretions, diagnosis of BV, and medication as needed. At baseline participants received an individual education session on the risk of engaging in IVP and tips on discontinuing IVP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Vaginal Practices
Time Frame: 12-months
Information on intravaginal practices was collected using a culturally tailored questionnaire assessing specific products used for IVP. Questions to assess product use in the prior month utilized a dichotomous response option: product use (1 = yes, 0 = no).
12-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 5, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Available from the PI upon request.

Study Data/Documents

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vaginosis, Bacterial

Clinical Trials on Women's and Sexual Health [WASH]

Subscribe