Prevalence of Severe Asthma in Spanish Hospitals

September 17, 2020 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

Observational Study to Describe the Prevalence of Severe Asthma in Spanish Hospitals

Asthma is a chronic disease. Prevalence of asthma in 2014 among Spanish population was 5%, of which 10% were diagnosed with severe asthma. According to Spanish National Guideline for the Management of Asthma (GEMA) 4.1 criteria, asthma can be classified according to its severity (intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent or severe persistent) or level of asthma control (controlled, partly controlled or uncontrolled). This Guideline describes that only 1 in 10 subjects with severe asthma is well controlled, meaning that there is a 90% prevalence of non-controlled severe asthma.

This prospective, non-interventional, observational, multicenter and case-control study aims to assess the prevalence of severe asthma in Spanish Hospitals. The study will describe the characteristics of severe versus non-severe asthmatic subjects, assess their eligibility to receive biological treatments approved for this disease, resource consumption and evaluate the most prevalent phenotypes of severe asthma in Spain. Enrolled subjects will be divided into two cohorts, based on asthma severity according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) and the International European Respiratory Society (ERS)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) Guidelines. Cohort A: subjects diagnosed of severe asthma and Cohort B: subjects with non-severe asthma. Approximately 320 severe asthmatic subjects and 160 non-severe asthmatic subjects will be enrolled in the study. A software of big data will be used to do a sub study for comparing the results obtained through this software tool against results obtained through Gold standard classical methods used in this prospective observational study (the descriptive assessment of severe asthma prevalence and the prospective evolution of subjects).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

356

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Badalona, Spain, 08916
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cartagena (Murcia), Spain, 30202
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cáceres, Spain, 10003
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Elda (Alicante), Spain, 03600
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain, 08907
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • La Coruña, Spain, 15006
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • La Laguna-Tenerife, Spain, 38320
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Loja/ Granada, Spain, 18300
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Lérida, Spain, 25198
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28006
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28007
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Madrid, Spain, 28031
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Majadahonda (Madrid), Spain, 28222
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Marbella, Spain, 29600
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Murcia (El Palmar), Spain, 30120
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Pamplona, Spain, 31008
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Ponferrada (León), Spain, 24411
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sagunto/Valencia, Spain, 46520
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Salamanca, Spain, 37007
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 15706
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41071
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Valdemoro/Madrid, Spain, 28340
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Valencia, Spain, 46017
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Xátiva-Valencia, Spain, 46800
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50009
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Zaragoza, Spain, 50015
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Cantabria
      • Laredo, Cantabria, Spain, 39770
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The severe asthmatic subjects according to the ATS/ERS Guidelines will enter into the prospective phase of the study. Non-severe asthmatic subjects will be also enrolled as a control group.

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • Group A: Subjects with Severe asthma can be enrolled, when they fulfill the following criteria:
  • Subjects >= 18 years
  • Subjects diagnosed with "severe asthma" defined as asthma that requires high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus Long-Acting Beta2-Agonist (LABA), leukotriene modifier/ theophylline in the last 12 months or continuous/almost continuous treatment with systemic glucocorticosteroids (CS) for >= 50% of the previous year to maintain control of asthma
  • Subjects treated with ICS/LABA, with the maximum dose recommended by Specific Product Characteristics (SPC).
  • Subjects who give voluntary written informed consent after explanation of study´s procedures.
  • Group B: Subjects with Non-Severe asthma can be enrolled, when they fulfill the following criteria:
  • Subjects >= 18 years
  • Subjects diagnosed with non-severe asthma per GINA Guidelines Classification
  • Subjects who give voluntary written informed consent after explanation of study´s procedures

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects who are not able to complete all the follow-ups of the study with all the study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Severe Asthmatic Subjects
Subjects requiring high dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) plus a second controller (and/or systemic glucocorticosteroids) to prevent it from becoming 'uncontrolled' or which remains 'uncontrolled' despite the therapy.
Subjects will be given an Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) with a series of questionnaire such as Asthma Control Test, Morisky-Green Questionnaire and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
Software of big data is a powerful data treatment algorithm works closely with Spanish Data Protection Agency as an example on how to reuse clinical information without conflicting with necessary data privacy. The system will process a vast amount of information (big data), so that the impact of random errors will be minimized.
Non-Severe Asthmatic Subjects
Subjects with intermittent, persistent mild or moderate asthma.
Subjects will be given an Electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) with a series of questionnaire such as Asthma Control Test, Morisky-Green Questionnaire and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire.
Software of big data is a powerful data treatment algorithm works closely with Spanish Data Protection Agency as an example on how to reuse clinical information without conflicting with necessary data privacy. The system will process a vast amount of information (big data), so that the impact of random errors will be minimized.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To estimate the prevalence of severe asthmatic subjects at Spanish sites
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Assessment will be done based on the type of hospital, department type of hospital or clinic, sources of the service and number of asthmatic subjects diagnosed according to GEMA guidelines.
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects with sociodemographic characteristics of severe asthmatic subjects compared to non-severe asthmatic subjects
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Subjects with different age, gender, ethnicity, education, occupational status, marital status, physical examination, smoking status, family history, co-morbidities and allergies will be compared for descriptive analysis of sociodemographic characteristics of subjects with severe asthma and non-severe asthma participating in this study.
Up to 12 months
Number of subjects with clinical characteristics of severe asthmatic subjects compared to non-severe asthmatic subjects
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Subjects with asthma severity, age of asthma onset, laboratory tests, biomarkers, skin prick test, airflow tests, asthma symptoms and exacerbations will be compared for clinical characteristics analysis of subjects with severe asthma and non-severe asthma participating in this study.
Up to 12 months
To estimate the prevalence of different phenotypes in severe asthma
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Prevalence of different severe asthma phenotypes (allergic, base on prick test, Immunoglobulin E (IgE), eosinophilic, based on eosinophils counts >= 300 cells/millimeter cubed in blood samples in the previous year, obesity, based on the absence of positive prick test, IgE or high eosinophils counts in blood sample; neutrophilic, just in case eosinophils in sputum are available.
Up to 12 months
Number of subjects who comply with eligibility criteria to receive biological treatment for severe asthma
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Number of exacerbations; Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) treatment; Number of visits to emergency room (ER) and/or hospitalization within the last 12 months, sputum eosinophils (if done), eosinophils in blood, IgE (specific and total), forced expiratory volume-one second (FEV1), Asthma Control Test (ACT), percentage of reversibility will be assessed.
Up to 12 months
Number of subjects evolved with severe asthma and non-severe asthma at 6 and 12 months from baseline
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Exacerbations; visits to emergency room; changes in treatment or dose increase, add-on therapy addition, Disease control (3-score change in ACT), Disease control state (uncontrolled, partially controlled, well controlled) according to guidelines, Quality of life (4-score change in SGRQ), mortality will be assessed.
Up to 12 months
Number of subjects evolved with severe asthma in comparison with non severe asthma at 6 and 12 months
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Subjects with severe and non severe asthma at 6 and 12 months will be compared.
Up to 12 months
To assess the social impact of subjects with severe asthma in comparison with non-severe asthmatic subjects in terms of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) will be analyzed from the SGRQ Questionnaire scores. Scores will be expressed as percentage of overall impairment, where 100 represents worst possible health and 0 indicates best possible health status.
Up to 12 months
To assess the use of healthcare resources (direct and indirect) in subjects with severe asthma and non-severe asthma
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Direct resources will include number of inpatient admissions, emergency and hospitalized visits, tests to be conducted, etc. on patients with severe asthma. The medical resources used (tests, admissions, etc.) will be analyzed descriptively during the observation period. The direct cost will be calculated by taking into account the resources used and unit costs at a local level. Indirect resources will include reduced productivity of patients with severe asthma through an ad-hoc questions like total number of work days lost due to asthma in the last 6 months.
Up to 12 months
To predict evolution of subjects with severe and non-severe asthma at month 6 and month 12, based on the physician's experience and knowledge, compared to results obtained through monitoring
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The variables to be predicted will be exacerbations; visits to ER; changes in treatment or dose increase; add-on therapy addition; disease control (3-score change in ACT); disease control state (uncontrolled, partially controlled, well controlled) according to guidelines, Quality of life (4-score change in SGRQ) and mortality will be assessed.
Up to 12 months
To establish the determinant factors clinicians use, to predict subjects evolution
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
FEV1 (pre & post), percentage reversibility FEV1, number of exacerbations, use of rescue medication, changes to the treatment required, need for adding a biological treatment, concomitant diseases or comorbidities, asthma symptoms; tobacco, eosinophils in blood or sputum, Asthma Control measured by ACT, number or hospitalizations; number of emergency department visits; dose of inhaled glucocorticosteroids, need and dose of oral glucocortocosteroids, mortality, adherence to medication, inhaler technique, fractionated exhaled nitric oxide level (FeNO), Body Mass Index (BMI), GINA treatment Step, living in a rural environment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), male sex, black race, lower educational level will be the determining factor for clinicians.
Up to 12 months
To test if the calculated prevalence using a specific software is similar to the prevalence of severe asthma obtained through monitoring using gold standard
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
This will provide a descriptive comparison between the gold standard data and the software's prediction.
Up to 12 months
To compare the prediction in the evolution of subjects with severe asthma at 6 and 12 months, based on the aggregated information collected in the last 5 years previous to the start of the observational study with the prediction done by the physician
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
This will provide a descriptive comparison between the clinician's prediction and the software's prediction.
Up to 12 months
To compare the software's prediction in the evolution of subjects with severe asthma at 6 and 12 months with the results obtained by monitoring in the observational study
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Gold standard data collected by monitoring will be compared against the real data.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire

3
Subscribe