Cognition and Functional Connectivity After Elective Treatment of Brain Aneurysms

January 7, 2018 updated by: Johannes Kepler University Linz, Medical University of Vienna

The aim of this proposal is to investigate the effects of uneventful microsurgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured saccular non-giant anterior communicating artery [ACoA] aneurysms on resting state functional connectivity levels of higher order cognitive networks and to correlate the connectivity levels of these networks with neuropsychological performance and functional outcome.

This study compares two treatment groups and one control group.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this proposal is to investigate the effects of uneventful microsurgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured saccular non-giant anterior communicating artery [ACoA] aneurysms on resting state functional connectivity levels of higher order cognitive networks and to correlate the connectivity levels of these networks with neuropsychological performance and functional outcome. The investigators' hypothesis is that the functional connectivity of various cognition networks, i.e. cognitive control network, emotion control of cognitive networks, and working memory networks, as assessed by resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging [rsfMRI], can be impaired after uneventful microsurgical and endovascular treatment of unruptured ACoA aneurysms and can be correlated with neuropsychological performance. The investigators propose to investigate 38 patients harboring unruptured ACoA aneurysms and 19 healthy controls over a 36 (until 48) months period. Patients and healthy controls will undergo baseline structural MRI, task fMRI, rsfMRI, and baseline neuropsychological examinations prior as well as 2 months after either microsurgical or endovascular aneurysm treatment or baseline examinations, respectively. Furthermore all subjects will undergo additional neuropsychological examinations 12 months after baseline examination or long-term recovery from microsurgical and endovascular treatment, respectively. The research question is of substantial importance for this patient population, since it is currently incompletely understood how the minor structural brain tissue damages seen after both treatment methods of unruptured ACoA aneurysms translate into the observed neuropsychological deficits - which are often subtle and transient in nature but still insufficiently explained on grounds of morphology and structural connectivity alone. The sensitivity of rsfMRI to depict the functional communication of spatially remote brain regions presents a novel opportunity to investigate these deficits on a whole brain scale by mapping resting state functional connectivity in higher order cognition networks that are thought to be endangered by events related to both microsurgery and embolization. Correlating these data seems promising for several reasons. First, functional connectivity analysis could be correlated with the neuropsychological impairment in various neuropsychiatric disorders and in ischemic stroke. Ischemic damage to the territories supplied by ACoA perforating arteries is involved in many cases of postoperative neuropsychological impairment after ACoA aneurysm treatment. Second, neuropsychological evaluations have become increasingly incorporated into the standard of care in the postoperative follow-up of cerebral aneurysm patients. RsfMRI could serve as a novel adjunct to neuropsychological outcome assessment. Third, the results could add relevant information to the general perception of the role of frontal lobe and forebrain damage in the pathophysiology of neurocognitive impairment. This could have an impact on neurorehabilitation programs to improve neurocognitive outcome and quality of life in this patient population. Forth, the correlation of validated neuropsychological tests with the functional connectivity rsfMRI data would further enhance the role of rsfMRI in neuroscience and its clinical use.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

57

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University Vienna, Dep. of Neurosurgery
    • Upper Austria
      • Linz, Upper Austria, Austria, 4020
        • Johannes Kepler University Linz, Dept. of Neurosurgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated in university hospital setting

Description

Intervention Groups:

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female patients aged > 18 years
  • Microsurgical or endovascular treatment of unruptured, saccular, non giant ACoA aneurysm
  • Right-handedness
  • Compliance (the patients have to be able to lay motionless in a 3 Tesla MR scanner and to cooperate with the examiner during the examination)
  • Willingness and competence to sign informed consent form
  • German native speaker

Exclusion criteria

  • Ruptured ACoA aneurysm
  • Previous history of intracranial hemorrhage or serious head injury
  • Non-saccular aneurysm [i.e. dissecting, fusiform, mycotic, traumatic]
  • Psychiatric or neuropsychological impairment prior to aneurysm treatment
  • Current use of any psychotropic drugs except aneurysm treatment related medication
  • Severe visual or auditory impairment
  • Current pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Metallic implants [other than aneurysm clips or coils detailed in the Ethics section] or other contraindications to MRI

Healthy controls:

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female subjects aged > 18 years
  • Right-handedness
  • Compliance [the patients have to be able to lay motionless in a 3 Tesla MR scanner and to cooperate with the examiner during the examination]
  • Willingness and competence to sign informed consent form
  • German native speaker

Exclusion criteria

  • Major concurrent or previous medical or neurological illness
  • Major concurrent or previous psychiatric Axis I disorder according to DSM-5
  • Clinically significant abnormal values in laboratory screening or general physical examination
  • Current use of any psychotropic drugs
  • Previous history of intracranial hemorrhage, serious head injury
  • Previous or current substance abuse [except nicotine and caffeine]
  • Severe visual or auditory impairment
  • Current pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Metallic implants or other contraindications to MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clipping
Clipping of an aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery - A titan clip will be placed round the aneurysm neck to exclude the aneurysm from the bloodflow and prevent fatal subarachnoidal hemorrhage. Patients will undergo baseline structural MRI, task fMRI, rsfMRI, and baseline neuropsychological examinations prior as well as 2 months after microsurgical aneurysm treatment. Furthermore the patients will undergo additional neuropsychological examinations 12 months after long-term recovery from microsurgical treatment.
During the microsurgical operation a titan clip will be placed round the aneurysm neck to exclude the aneurysm from the bloodflow and prevent fatal subarachnoidal hemorrhage.
Other Names:
  • microsurgical aneurysm clipping
Coiling
Coiling of an aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery - Using a catheter technique the aneurysm dome will be filled up with coils to prevent subarachnoidal hemorrhage. Patients will undergo baseline structural MRI, task fMRI, rsfMRI, and baseline neuropsychological examinations prior as well as 2 months after endovascular aneurysm treatment. Furthermore the patients will undergo additional neuropsychological examinations 12 months after long-term recovery from endovascular treatment.
Using a catheter technique the aneurysm dome will be filled up with coils to prevent subarachnoidal hemorrhage.
Other Names:
  • endovascular treatment of brain aneurysms
Healthy Controls
Healthy controls will undergo baseline structural MRI, task fMRI, rsfMRI, and baseline neuropsychological examinations prior as well as 2 months after baseline examinations. Furthermore all subjects will undergo additional neuropsychological examinations 12 months after baseline examination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prefrontal neuronal functional integration measured with fMRI
Time Frame: Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months
Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Prefrontal executive functioning measured with neuropsychological tests
Time Frame: Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months (short-term outcome) and after 12 months (long-term outcome).
Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months (short-term outcome) and after 12 months (long-term outcome).
Correlation of changes on neuropsychological (executive functioning) and neuronal level (fMRI).
Time Frame: Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months measured with fMRI correlated with changes in neuropsychological tests after 2 months (short-term outcome) and after 12 months (long-term outcome).
Changes pre- vs. posttreatment after 2 months measured with fMRI correlated with changes in neuropsychological tests after 2 months (short-term outcome) and after 12 months (long-term outcome).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andreas Gruber, MD, Johannes Kepler University of Linz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aneurysm

Clinical Trials on Clipping

3
Subscribe