Comparison Between Surgical Access and Repeated Applications of APDT

October 16, 2017 updated by: Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Comparison Between Surgical Access and Repeated Applications of APDT to Residual Pockets Treatment in Generalized Aggressive Periodontitis: Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study will be to compare the approach of repeated applications of APDT versus surgical therapy for the treatment of residual pockets in generalized agressive periodontitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Scaling and root planing may be insufficient to resolve the periodontal infection resulting in residual periodontal pockets. A method of treatment to these sites would be the surgical therapy, because it allows access to root surfaces, making possible a better decontamination. However, the surgical approach may bring some negative points, as more discomfort and postoperative morbidity, increased transoperatory risk and increased risk of contamination. Thus, finding other alternatives to residual pockets treatment, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) was recently proposed. Therefore, the aim of this study will be to compare the approach of repeated applications of APDT versus surgical therapy for the treatment of residual pockets in generalized agressive periodontitis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of generalized aggressive periodontitis (Armitage, 1999; American Academy of Periodontology, 2015);
  • Have undergone a first approach for periodontal treatment (full-mouth ultrasonic debridement);
  • Present at least one residual pocket of probing depth ≥ 5 mm and bleeding on probe not located in furcation region;
  • Good general health;
  • Agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form (TCLE) after explaining the risks and benefits;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic problems (cardiovascular alterations, blood dyscrasias, immunodeficiency - ASA III / IV / V) that contraindicate the periodontal procedure;
  • Have used antibiotics and anti-inflammatories in the last six months;
  • Smoke ≥ 10 cigarettes/day;
  • Pregnant or lactating;
  • Chronic use of medications that may alter the response of periodontal tissues;
  • Indication of antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Open flap debridement
In this group (n = 22), patients will receive open flap debridement will be performed to treat residual pockets.
Open flap debridement will be performed to decontaminate root surface
Other Names:
  • Surgical therapy
Active Comparator: Repeated application of aPDT
In this group (n=22), patients will receive 5 applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy after the scaling and root planing.
Repeated application of photodynamic therapy (aPDT) at 0, 1, 2, 7 and 14 days post-operatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical attachment level
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Probing depth
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mauro P Santamaria, DDS, PhD, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Julio de Mesquita Filho", ICT/UNESP

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 16, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aggressive Periodontitis, Generalized

Clinical Trials on Open flap debridement

Subscribe