Pain Assessment by Pupil Dilation Reflex (PDR) and Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) in Response to Noxious Stimulation in Anesthetized Adults

May 16, 2018 updated by: Davina Wildemeersch, University Hospital, Antwerp
After conduction a pilot study, pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) is measured in response to nociceptive stimulation perioperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

An infrared camera of the video pupillometer measures the pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) in response to incremental nociceptive stimuli. The PDR is a robust reflex, even in patients under general anesthesia, and may provide a potential evaluation of the autonomous nociceptive circuit. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I or II patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia are recruited. Enrolled patients perioperative undergo PDR measurement at 2 different standardized times (before and after opioid administration) generated by an inbuilt pupillary pain index (PPI) protocol. PPI, as a surrogate for nociception includes noxious stimulations from 10 up to 60 milli ampere (mA) until pupil dilation is larger than 13% from baseline diameter. Therefore, no inappropriate high stimulation is executed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antwerp
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • University Hospital Antwerp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled abdominal or gynecological surgery
  • ASA I-II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of eye deformity, invasive ophthalmologic surgery
  • Known cranial nerve(s) deficit
  • Infection of the eye
  • Predicted difficult airway management (DAF Guidelines)
  • Chronic opioid use (>3 months)
  • Ongoing treatment with beta-blockers, dopamine antagonists, topical atropine
  • Preoperatively administrated benzodiazepins or antiemetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: PDR measurement
Two measurements of PDR perioperatively before and after opioid administration

PDR measurement at two standardized times perioperatively:

  1. : anesthetized subject by propofol sedation until sedation depth monitor NeuroSense® (NeuroWave Systems Inc, Cleveland, OH) between 40-50
  2. : administration of remifentanil via effect site target concentration (Minto-model) at 5 ng/ml, in the absence of adjustments in sedation depth
Other Names:
  • PPI assessment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stimulation Intensity
Time Frame: During perioperative period
Necessary stimulation intensity to dilate the pupil more than 13%
During perioperative period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate
Time Frame: During PDR measurements
Tachycardia as a common used parameter for perioperative nociceptive assessment
During PDR measurements
Pupillary Pain Index score
Time Frame: During perioperative period
Device specific PPI score defined in accordance to stimulation intensity necessary for pupil dilation more than 13%
During perioperative period
Systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: During PDR measurements
Hypertension as a common used parameter for perioperative nociceptive assessment
During PDR measurements

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michiel Baeten, MD, University Hospital, Antwerp
  • Study Chair: Vera Saldien, MD, University Hospital, Antwerp
  • Principal Investigator: Natasja Peeters, MD, University Hospital, Antwerp

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 7, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 29, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16/40/410-2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nociceptive Pain

Clinical Trials on PDR measurement

Subscribe