Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Fusion

May 15, 2017 updated by: Gabriel C. Tender, MD, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans

Clinical Outcome After Lumbar Fusion for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain

The main objective of this prospective study is to compare the clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion for chronic low back pain using the four techniques commonly employed in our surgical practice. Lumbar fusion stops motion at a painful vertebral segment, which can decrease back pain. The four techniques are standard transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (S TLIF), minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI TLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), and axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF). Each differ in where incisions are made and level of invasiveness; not all may be implemented in each surgical case. The four different techniques are all standard approaches with different advantages and have yet to be compared in efficacy for relieving chronic low back pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Each patient who is willing to participate in this study, signs informed consent, and complies with the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Each patient will be enrolled chronologically on a patient enrollment log and given a patient number for the duration of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe chronic low back pain (at least 7 out of 10 on the VAS scale).

    • Age: 25-65 years.
    • Pain duration at least 2 years.
    • The treating surgeon should interpret the pain as emanating from L4-S1.
    • The patient must have had unsuccessful maximal possible conservative (non surgical) treatment for at least one year.
    • Radiographic evidence (MRI, CT, CT-SPECT, and/or plain films) of degenerative changes ("spondylosis")

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric illness or evidence of emotional instability.

    • Previous spine surgery except for successful removal of a herniated disc more than 2 years before entering the study and with no persistent nerve root symptoms.
    • Specific radiologic findings, such as fractures, infection, inflammatory process, or neoplasm.
    • Obvious painful and disabling arthritic hip joints and anamnestic and radiologic signs of spinal stenosis.
    • Involvement in Workman's Comp or litigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Low Back Pain emanating from L4-5
  1. S TLIF at L4-5 (n=10)
  2. MI TLIF at L4-5 (n=10)
  3. XLIF at L4-5 (n=10)

Standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (S TLIF)

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI TLIF)

AxiaLIF Fusion

Low Back Pain emanating from L5-S1
  1. S TLIF at L5-S1 (n=10)
  2. MI TLIF at L5-S1 (n=10)
  3. XLIF at L5-S1 (n=10)

Standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (S TLIF)

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI TLIF)

AxiaLIF Fusion

Low Back Pain emanating from L4-5 and L5-S1
  1. S TLIF at L4-5 and L5-S1 (n=10)
  2. MI TLIF at L4-5 and L5-S1 (n=10)
  3. XLIF at L4-5 and L5-S1 (n=10)

Standard Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (S TLIF)

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI TLIF)

AxiaLIF Fusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
This is part of the Patient Questionnaire primary outcome measure. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that measures the intensity or frequency of pain across a continuum of values.
2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Change from Baseline Prolo Functional and Economic Score
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
This is part of the Patient Questionnaire primary outcome measure. The Prolo Score is a 10-point scale consisting of only two questions evaluating the functional and economic status of the patient.
2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Change from Baseline Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
This is part of the Patient Questionnaire primary outcome measure. The Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) assess the amount of chronic spine pain that affects the patient's daily and work-leisure activities, anxiety-depression, and social interest.
2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Change from Baseline Short Form 12 (SF-12)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
This is part of the Patient Questionnaire primary outcome measure. The Short Form 12 (SF-12) was designed to measure the patient's functional health and well-being.
2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
Change from Baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year
This is part of the Patient Questionnaire primary outcome measure. The Oswestry Disability Index measures a patient's impairment and quality of life due to pain.
2 weeks, 6 months, 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiologic Fusion Rates
Time Frame: 6 months and 1 year
Fusion rates will be evaluated by flexion-extension X-rays and CT imaging.
6 months and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LSU-7270

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Fusion

3
Subscribe