Using the LENA System in Early Intervention

February 26, 2018 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Enhancing Communication Between Children in EI and Their Depressed Mothers

This project will determine whether an intervention to enhance communication between infants and toddlers with developmental disabilities and their depressed mothers can be integrated into federally-funded Early Intervention (EI) services. Participants will be mothers with depressive symptoms whose children are receiving EI services, along with their EI service providers.

The investigators will conduct a small randomized control trial using the Language ENhancement Assessment/intervention system (LENA), a technology-supported language monitoring system, with 20 mothers and one of their child's EI service providers. The LENA uses an infant or toddler garment with an integrated audiotape system that records adult speech centered on the child, child vocalizations, and reciprocal parent-child turn-taking conversations. The LENA software produces visual feedback that a mother can use to focus her language interactions with her child. A "LENA with feedback" group will follow participants in the intervention over 5 weeks: 5 weeks of LENA data collection (with mothers running the system 1 day/week for 16 consecutive hours), with feedback during 3 weeks (baseline=LENA, no feedback; 3 week intervention=LENA with feedback; post-intervention=LENA, no feedback). A "LENA no feedback" group will complete LENA data collection at baseline on the same schedule but will not receive feedback. The main difference between groups will be provision of LENA feedback and strategies to promote increased mother-child interactions. This design allows the investigators to isolate the effect of LENA with feedback, and minimizes attributing changes in language environments due to exposure to LENA alone. The investigators will analyze data from measures on LENA communication data (adult word count, child vocalizations and conversational turn-taking), and measures of child language, maternal depressive symptoms, and child disability profiles.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Early Intervention (EI) services are provided to infants and toddlers with documented developmental delays in all 50 states and US territories. EI improves long-term infant-toddler adaptation and lowers the cost of care if parents use the services. However, depressive symptoms can reduce mothers' ability to provide the daily child development-promoting activities recommended by EI, increasing the child's risk for communication and behavioral problems. Indeed, repeated studies have shown that depressive symptoms reduce mothers' consistent use of developmentally sensitive, child-centered speech which, in turn, lead to negative child cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Previous research showed that over one-third of mothers of children with disabilities have significant levels of depressive symptoms, a rate higher than the population at large. Infants and toddlers of depressed mothers have been shown to receive fewer intensive services and have been shown to interfere with uptake of EI services through impaired mother-child interactions. A preliminary study by the investigators found that over a third of mothers of infants and toddlers enrolled in EI in a large North Carolina county had severe depressive symptoms and depression histories. Fortunately, the investigators also found that when depressed mothers were provided with concrete, attainable skills for improving interactions with their child, the impact of depression on both mother and child was substantially reduced. Focusing on a depressed mother's child-centered speech and reciprocal communication also improves child outcomes, even when the child is cognitively compromised. However, none of these specialized services are part of EI best practices. Thus, EI is an ideal setting in which to integrate screening, referral and targeted skills for depressed mothers in order to improve parent-child interactions and ultimately, child outcomes.

This project will develop an intervention focused on communication between infants and toddlers with diagnosed or suspected developmental disabilities and their mothers who have depressive symptoms. The primary aim of the study is to test the initial efficacy of embedding a language pedometer, the Language ENhancement Assessment/intervention system (LENA), into EI to teach mothers to increase child-centered speech and reciprocal communication, which have been linked to positive child outcomes, and to increase parenting efficacy in depressed mothers of children in EI. While maternal depressive symptoms can disrupt developmentally stimulating, child-centered speech, simple tools to assess and provide feedback to mothers can improve the child-centered speech and reciprocal language interactions that positively impact child outcomes. Although the LENA has been used in other studies and shown improvements in mothers' child-centered speech, the system has not been used with mothers showing depressive symptoms or in the EI context.

Using a randomized wait-list controlled design, the investigators will examine whether use of the LENA with feedback from a supportive EI provider has an impact on the child's language environment, parenting efficacy and maternal depressive symptoms. The investigators will stratify mothers by group based on depressive symptoms (mild, moderate, moderately severe) and randomly assign them to intervention (LENA with feedback) or wait-list control (LENA no feedback). The investigators will examine the use of the LENA system and the impact on short term child outcomes including receptive/expressive language, functional and social communication, and social-emotional behavior, and on maternal depressive symptoms. Positive intervention outcomes may ultimately lead to a sustainable addition to EI programs in all 50 US states and territories.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27701
        • Durham Children's Developmental Services Agency

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Service Coordinator and Service Provider Inclusion:

  • Be a CDSA employee in Durham, Wake, Alamance or Guilford Counties, NC
  • Be a service coordinators or approved Speech-Language Provider(SLP) or Community Based Rehabilitative Service (CBRS) provider (service providers).
  • Eligibility of the service providers will be determined by the agreement of a mother to participate in the LENA portion of the study and the agreement of the service providers to participate as well.

Mothers Inclusion criteria:

  • Be 18 years or older. Mothers who are 18 years can give consent independently.
  • Be the biological or adoptive mother of an infant (6 weeks - 18 months old) or toddler (19 -32 months old) enrolled in EI at the time of recruitment; mothers must be the primary caretaker of the child.
  • EI services are offered only to infants and toddlers up to the age of 36 months; this study caps the age of enrollment at 32 months to ensure that toddlers are continuously enrolled in EI during the data collection period.
  • Able to independently give consent. Mothers must have adequate capacity to participate in the LENA intervention as well as understand what they will be asked to do as participants.
  • Score 8 or higher on the PHQ-9. This score is indicative of depressive symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

Service Coordinator and Service Provider Inclusion: none

Mothers Exclusion criteria:

  • Currently pregnant by self-report.
  • Child is completely deaf

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: LENA with Feedback
Mothers who will run the LENA system with their young children, AND who will receive feedback from their service providers on how to enhance the language the home language environment.
The LENA with Feedback intervention will involve mothers running the Language ENhancement Assessment/intervention system, an audiorecorder language pedometer that records adult speech centered on the child, child vocalizations, and parent-child reciprocal turn-taking conversations. During their regular EI providers will use a standardized feedback protocol that includes emphasizing the mother's strengths, reviewing the LENA visual output from the previous recording, and asking questions to elicit how the mother can increase her child-centered and reciprocal communications during daily routines. The conversation will include concrete examples of how the mother can increase the language exchanges, encouragement, and practical ways to individually tailor the strategies to the family.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: LENA no feedback
Mothers who will only run the LENA system with their young children. These mothers will NOT receive feedback from their service providers on how to enhance the language the home language environment.
The LENA with Feedback intervention will involve mothers running the Language ENhancement Assessment/intervention system, an audiorecorder language pedometer that records adult speech centered on the child, child vocalizations, and parent-child reciprocal turn-taking conversations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in LENA Adult Word Count score after 5 weeks
Time Frame: pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
The LENA system, which records adult-child vocalizations, measures the number of the target adult's (e.g., parent) child-directed words (child-directed speech). The total possible range is 0-n, where higher scores indicate an increased number of child-directed words spoken by the target adult and higher degrees of a language-rich environment. Lower scores indicate fewer words spoken by the target adult and represent an environment that is not language-rich.
pre/post for a 5-week intervention window

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Parenting Sense of Competence Scale Efficacy subscale score after 5 weeks
Time Frame: pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale is a 17-item measure assessing parental competence. Each item is rated on a 6 point Likert scale anchored by 1 = "Strongly Disagree" and 6 = "Strongly Agree". The Efficacy subscale measures feelings of efficacy as a parent. It has 7 questions (1,6,7,10,11,13,15), producing a range of 6-42. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy. Lower scores mean more impairment.
pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score after 5 weeks
Time Frame: pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
The PHQ-9 is a depression scale used to assess brief depression severity by rating symptoms and functional impairment experienced in the last two weeks. The questionnaire contains a total of 9 questions, and each question is scored on a range from 0-3. The minimum value "0" represents not at all, "1" several days, "2" indicates more than half the days, and the maximum value "3" stands for nearly every day. The total possible range is 0-27, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. The total number of each 0, 1, 2, 3 is added and multiplied by its value (0=0, 1=1, etc.) to produce a total score generated from the subtotal sum. The PHQ-9 total score is interpreted as follows: 0-4 represents minimal depression, 5-9 as mild depression, 10-14 as moderate depression, 15-19 moderately severe depression, and 20-27 severe depression.
pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
Change in LENA Mother/Child Turn-Taking score after 5 weeks
Time Frame: pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
The LENA system, which records adult-child vocalizations, measures the number of conversational turns between the target adult (e.g., parent) and child. The total possible range is 0-n, where higher scores indicate an increased number of turns (back-and-forth, or "reciprocal" language exchanges) between the adult and child, reflecting higher degrees of a language-rich environment. Lower scores indicate fewer conversational turns between the adult and child, and represent an environment that is not language-rich.
pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
Change in LENA Child Vocalization score after 5 weeks
Time Frame: pre/post for a 5-week intervention window
The LENA system, which records adult-child vocalizations, measures the number of vocalizations of the target child. The total possible range is 0-n, where higher scores indicate an increased number of vocalizations from the child, reflecting higher levels of language development. Lower scores indicate fewer vocalizations from child, and represent lower levels of language development.
pre/post for a 5-week intervention window

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 23, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-2105a
  • 1R03HD086330-01 (NIH)
  • 550KR141630 (OTHER_GRANT: NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on LENA with Feedback

Subscribe