Decision Aids to Improve Knowledge in Patients With Prostate Cancer

July 13, 2023 updated by: Jon C. Tilburt, Mayo Clinic

Testing Decision Aids to Improve Prostate Cancer Decisions for Minority Men

This randomized phase III trial studies how well decision aids work in improving knowledge in patients with prostate cancer. Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge of their condition and options for treatment, and may also help when talking with their doctor.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alaska
      • Anchorage, Alaska, United States, 99508
        • Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium
    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
        • Metrohealth Medical Center Urology Institute
    • South Dakota
      • Rapid City, South Dakota, United States, 57701
        • Regional Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have prostate biopsy within 4 months prior to registration showing newly diagnosed prostate cancer, stage T1-3N0M0; in addition, patients must have: Gleason score 6-10
  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 50 ng/mL
  • Patients who have had a history of non-cutaneous malignancy in the previous 5 years are not eligible; exception: patients with history of non-melanoma skin cancer are eligible
  • Scheduled prostate cancer consultation to be the first consultation after diagnosis (i.e. not a second-opinion or a consultation following previous discussions of treatment options)
  • Patients may not be concurrently enrolled to another clinical trial for the treatment of cancer; co-enrollment to biospecimen studies is allowed
  • Patients with impaired decision-making capacity (such as with a diagnosis of dementia or memory loss) are not eligible for this study
  • Patients must be able to read and comprehend English; non-English-speaking patients may participate so long as an interpreter (e.g., family member, clinic staff, etc.) is present for consent, for the decision aid administration, and gathering of baseline and follow-up measures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A (Knowing Your Options)
Arm A ("Knowing your Options") Patients receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid before their consultation visit.
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment, Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid
Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid
Experimental: Arm B (Prostate Choice)
Patients receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid during their consultation visit.
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment, Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Receive "Knowing your Options" decision aid
Receive "Prostate Choice" decision aid
Active Comparator: Arm C (Usual Care)
Patients undergo usual care.
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Other Names:
  • Quality of Life Assessment, Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Undergo usual care
Other Names:
  • best practice, Best Practice, standard of care, standard therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge Assessed by Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary outcome, knowledge, will be assessed by a standardized questionnaire (i.e., Prostate Cancer Treatment Questionnaire) administered once, immediately after the clinical consultation while the patient is still at the study site. The number correct from this 12-item measure will be reduced to a proportion of total number correct. With 1.0 (12 out of 12 item average) being the best possible outcome and 0.0 (0 out of 12 item average) the worst possible outcome
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decisional Quality as Measured by Decisional Regret Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The Decisional Regret Scale is a short, 5-item scale measuring "distress or remorse after a (health care) decision." The instrument has been validated in other decision aid studies. Questions are answered on a 5-point agreement scale. A score of 0 means no decisional regret and 5 is the maximum level of regret. The continuous scores were then grouped into two categories, 0 (no regret) and 1+ (at least some regret).
12 months
Quality of Life Assessed by Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months
The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composit (EPIC-26) measures health-related quality of life and returns summary scores for urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains with high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Scores will be converted into continuous summary scores using standard algorithms. For the EPIC-26 questionnaire, scores were transformed into 0 to 100 scales, with a score of 0 represented the worst possible health-related quality of life and a score of 100 representing the most favorable health-related quality of life. The questionnaire will be administered once; 12 months after the patient's initial consultation.
12 months
Utilization as Determined by Chart Review
Time Frame: 12 months
Will be categorized by the type of treatment the patient elected to receive. Will be compared across intervention arms.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jon C. Tilburt, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Laboratory Biomarker Analysis

Subscribe