Specific Use-Result of Spiriva Respimat® in Asthmatics

November 8, 2019 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

Specific Use-Result Surveillance of Spiriva Respimat in Asthmatics (Patients With Mild and Moderate Persistent Asthma)

The study objective is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of Spiriva Respimat in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma under real-world use

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is Post-Marketing Surveillance on the Long-Term Use of Spiriva Respimat in Japanese patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The patient population who receive Spiriva Respimat and the safety profile is not expected to change. This study can investigate the safety and effectiveness of Spiriva Respimat in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma under real-world use

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

193

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan, 1416017
        • Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate persistent bronchial asthma

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with mild to moderate persistent bronchial asthma
  • Patient aged ≥ 15 years
  • Patients who are naive to Spiriva Respimat and receive Spiriva Respimat for the first time for treatment of bronchial asthma on top of at least ICS treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have a contraindication to Spiriva Respimat defined in the package insert for Spiriva Respimat
  • Patients who have been enrolled in this study before.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Spiriva Respimat group
Drug
Other Names:
  • FORVENT, SPIRIVA, SRIVASSO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: From first drug administration until 30 days after last drug administration; up to 337 days

Number of participants with suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) is presented.

An Adverse Event (AE) was considered to be ADR if either the physician who reported the AE or the sponsor assessed its causal relationship as related.

From first drug administration until 30 days after last drug administration; up to 337 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Status at Week 12 Using Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline
Time Frame: baseline and 12 weeks

The change from baseline in asthma control status at week 12 using Asthma prevention and management guideline is presented.

Well controlled is a better outcome compared to Insufficiently controlled and Poorly controlled outcomes.

Abbreviations used:

Baseline (BL), Week 12 (W12), Well-controlled (WC), Insufficiently controlled (IC), Poorly controlled (PC), Unknown (UNK), Missing (MIS); If a patient was well-controlled at baseline and maintained the state until Week 12, the effectiveness was assessed as "no change". If a patient insufficiently controlled or poorly controlled at baseline became well-controlled at Week 12, or if a patient was poorly controlled at baseline and became insufficiently controlled at Week 12, Spiriva Respimat was assessed as "effective" (or the patient assessed as a responder). If the disease condition did not improve in a patient at Week 12 from baseline, Spiriva Respimat was assessed as "ineffective" (or the patient assessed as a non-responder).

baseline and 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Yukako Ogi, zzCDMJP_PV_PMS@boehringer-ingelheim.com

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Asthma

Clinical Trials on Spiriva Respimat

Subscribe