Effectiveness of Office Bleaching Agents in Patients of Different Age Group

February 9, 2018 updated by: Gisele Rodrigues da Silva, Federal University of Uberlandia

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Office Bleaching Agents in Patients of Different Age Group

To evaluate the effectiveness in terms of color variation, patient satisfaction, absolute risk and intensity of dentin sensitivity due to dental bleaching in the office with 35% hydrogen peroxide (Whiteness HP Automixx 35%, FGM) and Opalescence Boost 38% ( Ultradent, South Jordan, UT, USA) in the same arch in patients of different age groups: 18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years. Data will be collected, tabulated and submitted to statistical analysis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Throughout life, the aging of the human being as a whole is inevitable. The dental structure such as cementum and dentin undergo some changes over time, such as secondary deposition of dentin, which results in the reduction of root canal length. In addition, with aging the teeth undergo color changes, presenting a more yellowish or grayish coloration (Ravindra SV et al., 2015). The fact is that most of the studies that involve the technique of dental bleaching have as inclusion factor only young adult patients, excluding patients of more advanced age groups. Therefore, it is fundamental to evaluate the whitening technique in these older patients, since it is a treatment that does not cause harm to the individuals To assess the effect of dental bleaching in the office with Whiteness HP Automixx, FGM at 35% and Opalescence Boost at 38% in the same arch, in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years) in absolute risk and intensity Of the postoperative dental sensitivity through the visual analog (VAS 0-10) and analogue (NRS 0-4) scales.

  • Evaluate the efficacy of Whitening HP Automixx, FGM 35% and Opalescence Boost 38% in the same arch in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years) using Color Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide, and the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer.
  • Evaluate the satisfaction of patients after Whitening HP Automixx at 35, FGM and Opalescence Boost 38% in the same arch in different age groups (18 to 25 years and 40 to 65 years).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Av Pará S/n Bloco 4 L Anexo A Sala 42 Campus Umuarama
      • Uberlândia, Av Pará S/n Bloco 4 L Anexo A Sala 42 Campus Umuarama, Brazil
        • Gisele Rodrigues da Silva

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients over 18 years of age up to 25 years
  • Patients aged 40 years up to 65 years
  • Good oral and general health
  • Teeth free of restorations or with small restorations
  • Free from carious injury,
  • Patients with tooth color A2 or darker according to the Vita Classical color scale (Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany)
  • Agree to the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • extensive restoration
  • Patients who have already undergone dental whitening
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • That report dental sensitivity
  • With non-carious cervical lesion
  • Parafunctional habits
  • Orthodontic appliances
  • Any other type of oral pathology
  • Smokers, patients who are using analgesic or anti-inflammatory drugs, present systemic alterations such as gastric, cardiac, renal and hepatic problems, diabetics, hypertensives or pre-existing neoplasias.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Young Patient
With 18-25 years old. Drug: Hydrogen peroxide 35%. Drug: Hydrogen peroxide 38%
The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.
Other Names:
  • Hydrogen peroxide 38%
The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.
Other Names:
  • Hydrogen peroxide 35%
Other: Adult Patient
With 40-65 years old. Drug: Hydrogen peroxide 35%. Drug: Hydrogen peroxide 38%
The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.
Other Names:
  • Hydrogen peroxide 38%
The office bleaching products will be applied on one of dental hemi-arch of young patients (18-25 years) or adult patients (40-65 years), after randomization. The product will apllied according manufacture instrutions.
Other Names:
  • Hydrogen peroxide 35%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tooth discoloration
Time Frame: 36 weeks
Efficacy of office dental whitening mensured by Easyshade spectrophotometer.
36 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dentin sensitivity
Time Frame: 36 weeks
It will analised the risk and intensity of tooth sensitivity of dental bleaching
36 weeks
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 36 weeks
It will analised the patient satisfaction by questionnaire of self-perception of aesthetics (PIDAQ)
36 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gisele Silva, Dra, Federal University of Uberlandia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CAAE: 57252216.2.0000.5152

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Study Data/Documents

  1. Metanalysis, systematic review
    Information identifier: 27045285
  2. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: 21740236
  3. Clinical Study Report
    Information identifier: 21488723
  4. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: 27007348

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on Hydrogen peroxide 35%

3
Subscribe