- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03196297
A Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Administration of Concizumab in Patients With Severe Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors (explorer™5)
November 15, 2021 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S
A Multi-Centre Trial Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Administration of Concizumab in Patients With Severe Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA).
The aim of the trial is to assess the efficacy of concizumab administered s.c.
(subcutaneously, under the skin) once daily in preventing bleeding episodes in patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
36
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brest, France, 29609
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Caen, France, 14033
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Nantes Cedex 1, France, 44093
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bonn, Germany, 53127
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Homburg, Germany, 66421
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Milano, Italy, 20124
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Rome, Italy, 00168
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Nara, Japan, 634-8522
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 167-0035
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 160-0023
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Málaga, Spain, 29010
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Valencia, Spain, 46026
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Malmö, Sweden, 205 02
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Solna, Sweden, 171 64
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bangkok, Thailand, 10400
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06100
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Bornova-IZMIR, Turkey, 35100
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Edirne, Turkey, 22030
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
İstanbul, Turkey, 34098
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Lviv, Ukraine, 79044
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Belfast, United Kingdom, BT9 7AB
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
London, United Kingdom, NW3 2QG
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84113
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Description
Inclusion Criteria: - Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities.
Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine the suitability for the trial - Male patients aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent, diagnosed with severe haemophilia A (FVIII activity below 1%), based on medical records or results at screening Exclusion Criteria: - Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product(s) or related products - Known inherited or acquired bleeding disorder other than haemophilia A - Presence of inhibitors (neutralising antibodies) to Factor VIII (equal to or above 0.6 Bethesda Units) at screening measured by the Nijmegen method
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Concizumab
Daily administration of concizumab to both on-demand and prophylaxis patients
|
0.15 mg/kg (with potential stepwise dose administration to 0.25 mg/kg) administered daily s.c (subcutaneously, under the skin).
Treatment duration is 24 weeks in the main phase, and 52 weeks in the extension phase
Breakthrough bleeding episodes will be treated by the patients at home with turoctocog alfa at the discretion of the study doctor, who will also choose dose levels
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Bleeding Episodes During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset
|
The number of bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset are presented.
The data is presented while on last dose level when the bleed occurred.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Bleeding Episodes During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset
|
The number of bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset are presented.
The data is presented while on last dose level when the bleed occurred.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset
|
|
The Number of Spontaneous Bleeding Episodes During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset
|
Bleeds that were not linked to a specific, known action or event are called spontaneous bleeding episodes.
The number of spontaneous bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset are presented.
The data is presented while on last dose level when the bleed occurred.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset
|
|
The Number of Spontaneous Bleeding Episodes During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset
|
Bleeds that were not linked to a specific, known action or event are called spontaneous bleeding episodes.
The number of spontaneous bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset are presented.
The data is presented while on last dose level when the bleed occurred.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset
|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset from the first exposure to treatment until the last visit in the trial.
Number of TEAEs that occurred during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per dose level participants were on at the time of onset of the adverse event.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset from the first exposure to treatment until the last visit in the trial.
Number of TEAEs that occurred during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per dose level participants were on at the time of onset of the adverse event.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Occurrence of Anti-concizumab Antibodies During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Occurrence of anti-concizumab antibodies during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
In the reported data, 'Yes' infers number of participants who showed positive anti-concizumab antibody tests whereas 'No' infers number of participants who showed negative anti-concizumab antibody tests.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Occurrence of Anti-concizumab Antibodies During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Occurrence of anti-concizumab antibodies during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
In the reported data, 'Yes' infers number of participants who showed positive anti-concizumab antibody tests whereas 'No' infers number of participants who showed negative anti-concizumab antibody tests.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Fibrinogen During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in fibrinogen during 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Fibrinogen During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in fibrinogen during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in D-dimer During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in D-dimer during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in D-dimer During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in D-dimer during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + F2) During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in F1 + F2 during 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + F2) During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in F1 + F2 during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Time (PT) During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in PT during 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Time (PT) During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in PT during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in APTT during 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in APTT during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Anti-thrombin (AT) During 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in AT during 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Anti-thrombin (AT) After at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in AT after at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Concentration of Concizumab Prior to the Last Dose Administration at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Concentration of concizumab prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Concentration of Concizumab Prior to the Last Dose Administration After at Least 76 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
Concentration of concizumab prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
|
Free Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) Concentration Value Prior to the Last Dose Administration at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Free TFPI (TFPI not bound to concizumab) concentration value prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Free Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) Concentration Value Prior to the Last Dose Administration After at Least 76 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
Free TFPI concentration value prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
|
Peak Thrombin Generation Prior to the Last Dose Administration at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Peak thrombin generation is the maximal concentration of thrombin formed at a given point in time.
Peak thrombin generation prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Peak Thrombin Generation Prior to the Last Dose Administration After at Least 76 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
Peak thrombin generation is the maximal concentration of thrombin formed at a given point in time.
Peak thrombin generation prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential Prior to the Last Dose Administration at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), defined as the amount of thrombin which can be generated after the in vitro activation of coagulation with tissue factor as trigger and phospholipids as platelet substitute.
Endogenous thrombin potential prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential Prior to the Last Dose Administration After at Least 76 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
The endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), defined as the amount of thrombin which can be generated after the in vitro activation of coagulation with tissue factor as trigger and phospholipids as platelet substitute.
Endogenous thrombin potential prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
|
Thrombin Generation Velocity Index Prior to the Last Dose Administration at 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Thrombin generation velocity index represents the effective rate of thrombin generation between lag time and time to peak.
Thrombin generation velocity index prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Thrombin Generation Velocity Index Prior to the Last Dose Administration After at Least 76 Weeks
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
Thrombin generation velocity index represents the effective rate of thrombin generation between lag time and time to peak.
Thrombin generation velocity index prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Shapiro AD, Angchaisuksiri P, Astermark J, Benson G, Castaman G, Eichler H, Jimenez-Yuste V, Kavakli K, Matsushita T, Poulsen LH, Wheeler AP, Young G, Zupancic-Salek S, Oldenburg J, Chowdary P. Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors. Blood Adv. 2022 Jun 14;6(11):3422-3432. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006403.
- Shapiro AD, Angchaisuksiri P, Astermark J, Benson G, Castaman G, Chowdary P, Eichler H, Jimenez-Yuste V, Kavakli K, Matsushita T, Poulsen LH, Wheeler AP, Young G, Zupancic-Salek S, Oldenburg J. Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results. Blood. 2019 Nov 28;134(22):1973-1982. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001542.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
August 16, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
June 22, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
June 3, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 20, 2017
First Posted (ACTUAL)
June 22, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
November 16, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 15, 2021
Last Verified
November 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NN7415-4255
- U1111-1179-3872 (OTHER: World Health Organization (WHO))
- 2016-000614-29 (REGISTRY: EudraCT)
- JapicCTI-173682 (REGISTRY: JAPIC)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
According to the Novo Nordisk disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Haemophilia A
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHaemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia BFrance, United States, India, Mexico, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Korea, Republic of, Spain, Switzerland, Serbia, Turkey, Bulgaria, Italy, Japan, Poland, South Africa, Croatia, Algeria, Australia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, ... and more
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedEpidemiological Study on Haemophilia Care and Orthopaedic Status in Developing Countries (HAEMOcare)Congenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia BIndia, Morocco, South Africa, Oman
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia BSpain
-
American Thrombosis and Hemostasis NetworkTakeda; CSL Behring; OctapharmaCompletedHemophilia A | Hemophilia B | Hemophilia | Hemophilia A With Inhibitor | Haemophilia | Hemophilia B With Inhibitor | Haemophilia A Without Inhibitor | Haemophilia B Without InhibitorUnited States
-
Novo Nordisk A/SWithdrawnHealthy | Congenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia B
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia B | Relatives to/Carers of PatientsSpain, Canada, United Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia BUnited States
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With Inhibitors | Haemophilia A | Haemophilia B | Relatives to/Carers of PatientsBrazil
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHaemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia AUnited States, Spain, Canada, Netherlands, China, India, United Kingdom, Lithuania, Taiwan, Slovakia, Romania, Malaysia, France, Austria, Serbia, Mexico, South Africa, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Portugal, Belgium, Switzerland, Germany and more
-
Swedish Orphan BiovitrumCompletedHaemophilia A | Haemophilia BFrance, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Belgium, United Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Concizumab
-
Novo Nordisk A/SAvailableCongenital HaemophiliaUnited States, Sweden, Bulgaria
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A Without Inhibitors | Haemophilia B Without InhibitorsSpain, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Lithuania, France, India, Estonia, Poland, Malaysia, Mexico, Japan, Serbia, South Africa, Canada, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Sweden, Germany, Portugal, South... and more
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With InhibitorsSpain, Australia, India, United Kingdom, Poland, Malaysia, Mexico, United States, Serbia, Japan, South Africa, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Algeria, Slovakia, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal, South Korea, Czechia, Russia, Austria, Ukraine, Turkey... and more
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A and B With and Without InhibitorsSpain, United States, Canada, Poland, Malaysia, India, Thailand, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Estonia, South Africa, Greece, Bulgaria, Japan, Norway, Algeria, Lebanon, Lithuania, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye), North Macedonia, Sweden, Bosnia...
-
Novo Nordisk A/SEnrolling by invitationHaemophilia A | Haemophilia BJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SEnrolling by invitationHaemophilia A, Haemophilia BJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia AUnited States, Netherlands, Austria, Spain, Poland, United Kingdom, Croatia, Germany, Malaysia, Australia, France, Israel, Thailand, Ukraine, Turkey
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With InhibitorsUnited States, Austria, Spain, Japan, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom, Israel, Sweden, Ukraine, Malaysia, Greece, Denmark, Canada
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedGlanzmann ThrombastheniaFrance