- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03196284
A Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Administration of Concizumab in Haemophilia A and B Patients With Inhibitors (explorer™4)
September 24, 2021 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S
A Multi-Centre, Randomised, Open-Label, Controlled Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Administration of Concizumab in Haemophilia A and B Patients With Inhibitors
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe and North America.
The aim of the trial is to assess the efficacy of concizumab administered s.c.
(subcutaneously, under the skin) once daily in preventing bleeding episodes in haemophilia A and B patients with inhibitors.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
26
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Wien, Austria, 1090
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1X1
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Zagreb, Croatia, 10 000
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Århus N, Denmark, 8200
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Athens, Greece, GR-11527
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Tel-Hashomer, Israel, 52621
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Firenze, Italy, 50134
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Milano, Italy, 20124
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Nara, Japan, 634-8522
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Tokyo, Japan, 167-0035
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Georgetown, Penang, Malaysia, 10450
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, 88586
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Sevilla, Spain, 41013
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Solna, Sweden, 171 64
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
Lviv, Ukraine, 79044
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
-
London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
-
-
California
-
Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Description
Inclusion Criteria: - Informed consent obtained before any trial related activities.
Trial related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine the suitability for the trial - Male haemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent - Patients currently in need of treatment with bypassing agents Exclusion Criteria: - Known or suspected hypersensitivity to trial product(s) or related products - Known inherited or acquired bleeding disorder other than haemophilia - Ongoing or planned immune tolerance induction therapy or prophylaxis with FVIII or FIX
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Concizumab
Concizumab administered in both the main phase and extension phase, with eptacog alfa administered on-demand during bleeding episodes
|
A loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg will be given as the first dose, followed by 0.15 mg/kg (with potential stepwise dose escalation to 0.25 mg/kg) administered daily s.c.
(subcutaneously, under the skin).
Treatment duration is 24 weeks in the main trial, and up to 52 weeks in the extension phase
A single dose of 90 μg/kg eptacog alfa one week after dosing with concizumab.
On-demand treatment during bleeding episodes in both treatment arms
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Eptacog alfa and concizumab
Eptacog alfa administered on-demand during bleeding episodes as the only intervention during the main phase.
Concizumab given in the extension phase
|
A loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg will be given as the first dose, followed by 0.15 mg/kg (with potential stepwise dose escalation to 0.25 mg/kg) administered daily s.c.
(subcutaneously, under the skin).
Treatment duration is 24 weeks in the main trial, and up to 52 weeks in the extension phase
A single dose of 90 μg/kg eptacog alfa one week after dosing with concizumab.
On-demand treatment during bleeding episodes in both treatment arms
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
The number of bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Number of Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
The number of bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
This outcome measure is applicable for only 'Concizumab' treatment arm.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
The Number of Spontaneous Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Bleeds that were not linked to a specific, known action or event are called spontaneous bleeding episodes.
The number of spontaneous bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
The Number of Spontaneous Bleeding Episodes
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Bleeds that were not linked to a specific, known action or event are called spontaneous bleeding episodes.
The number of spontaneous bleeding episodes that were treated during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset from the first exposure to treatment until the last visit in the trial.
Number of TEAEs that occurred during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per the dose level which the participants have reached at the time of event.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset from the first exposure to treatment until the last visit in the trial.
Number of TEAEs that occurred during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) are presented.
The data is presented per the dose level which the participants have reached at the time of event.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Number of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Within 24 Hours After Eptacog Alfa Administration
Time Frame: Within 24 hours after eptacog alfa administration
|
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal product, and which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment.
A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset from the first exposure to treatment until the last visit in the trial.
Number of TEAEs that occurred within 24 hours after eptacog alfa administration are presented.
This outcome measure is applicable only for 'Eptacog alfa' treatment arm.
|
Within 24 hours after eptacog alfa administration
|
|
Occurrence of Anti-concizumab Antibodies During at Least 24 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Occurrence of anti-concizumab antibodies during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
This outcome measure is applicable for only 'Concizumab' treatment arm.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Occurrence of Anti-concizumab Antibodies During at Least 76 Weeks From Treatment Onset
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Occurrence of anti-concizumab antibodies during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
This outcome measure is applicable for only 'Concizumab' treatment arm.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Fibrinogen
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in fibrinogen during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Fibrinogen
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in fibrinogen during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in D-dimer
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in D-dimer during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in D-dimer
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in D-dimer during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2)
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in F1 + 2 during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2)
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in F1 + 2 during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in PT during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Prothrombin Time (PT)
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in PT during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in APTT during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT)
Time Frame: During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in APTT during at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Anti-thrombin (AT)
Time Frame: During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in AT during at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
During at least 24 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Change in Anti-thrombin (AT)
Time Frame: After at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
Change in AT after at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0) is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
After at least 76 weeks from treatment onset (week 0)
|
|
Concentration of Concizumab
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Concentration of concizumab prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Concentration of Concizumab
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Concentration of concizumab prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
|
Free Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) Concentration Value
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Free TFPI (TFPI not bound to concizumab) concentration value prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Free Tissue Factor Pathway Inhibitor (TFPI) Concentration Value
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Free TFPI concentration value prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
|
Peak Thrombin Generation
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Peak thrombin generation is the maximal concentration of thrombin formed at a given point in time.
Peak thrombin generation prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Peak Thrombin Generation
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Peak thrombin generation is the maximal concentration of thrombin formed at a given point in time.
Peak thrombin generation prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Endogenous thrombin potential prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Endogenous Thrombin Potential
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Endogenous thrombin potential prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
|
Thrombin Generation Velocity Index
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
Thrombin generation velocity index prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration at 24 weeks
|
|
Thrombin Generation Velocity Index
Time Frame: Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Thrombin generation velocity index prior to the last dose administration after at least 76 weeks is presented.
The data is presented per the last dose level which the participants have reached at the time of assessment.
|
Prior to the last dose administration after atleast 76 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Shapiro AD, Angchaisuksiri P, Astermark J, Benson G, Castaman G, Eichler H, Jimenez-Yuste V, Kavakli K, Matsushita T, Poulsen LH, Wheeler AP, Young G, Zupancic-Salek S, Oldenburg J, Chowdary P. Long-term efficacy and safety of subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors. Blood Adv. 2022 Jun 14;6(11):3422-3432. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006403.
- Shapiro AD, Angchaisuksiri P, Astermark J, Benson G, Castaman G, Chowdary P, Eichler H, Jimenez-Yuste V, Kavakli K, Matsushita T, Poulsen LH, Wheeler AP, Young G, Zupancic-Salek S, Oldenburg J. Subcutaneous concizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A and hemophilia A/B with inhibitors: phase 2 trial results. Blood. 2019 Nov 28;134(22):1973-1982. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019001542.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
August 10, 2017
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
September 19, 2018
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 31, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 20, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 20, 2017
First Posted (ACTUAL)
June 22, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
October 22, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 24, 2021
Last Verified
September 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NN7415-4310
- U1111-1179-2925 (OTHER: World Health Organization (WHO))
- 2016-000510-30 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
- JapicCTI-173681 (REGISTRY: JAPIC)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
According to disclosure commitment on novonordisk-trials.com
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Congenital Bleeding Disorder
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedObservational Study on Safety and Efficacy of NovoSeven® in Subjects With Congenital FVII DeficiencyCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FVII DeficiencyJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencySpain, United States, Canada, Italy, United Kingdom, Hungary
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited Kingdom, Israel, United States
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited States, Israel, United Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHealthy | Congenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHealthy | Congenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHealthy | Congenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited Kingdom
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Congenital FXIII DeficiencyUnited States, Israel, Austria, Spain, Switzerland, Germany, Canada, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Finland
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHealthy | Congenital Bleeding DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Concizumab
-
Novo Nordisk A/SAvailableCongenital HaemophiliaUnited States, Sweden, Bulgaria
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A Without Inhibitors | Haemophilia B Without InhibitorsSpain, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Lithuania, France, India, Estonia, Poland, Malaysia, Mexico, Japan, Serbia, South Africa, Canada, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Italy, Slovakia, Sweden, Germany, Portugal, South... and more
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A With Inhibitors | Haemophilia B With InhibitorsSpain, Australia, India, United Kingdom, Poland, Malaysia, Mexico, United States, Serbia, Japan, South Africa, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Algeria, Slovakia, France, Italy, Norway, Portugal, South Korea, Czechia, Russia, Austria, Ukraine, Turkey... and more
-
Novo Nordisk A/SActive, not recruitingHaemophilia A and B With and Without InhibitorsSpain, United States, Canada, Poland, Malaysia, India, Thailand, United Kingdom, France, Italy, Estonia, South Africa, Greece, Bulgaria, Japan, Norway, Algeria, Lebanon, Lithuania, Romania, Turkey (Türkiye), North Macedonia, Sweden, Bosnia...
-
Novo Nordisk A/SEnrolling by invitationHaemophilia A | Haemophilia BJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SEnrolling by invitationHaemophilia A, Haemophilia BJapan
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedCongenital Bleeding Disorder | Haemophilia AUnited States, Netherlands, Austria, Spain, Poland, United Kingdom, Croatia, Germany, Malaysia, Australia, France, Israel, Thailand, Ukraine, Turkey
-
Novo Nordisk A/SCompletedHaemophilia A | HaemostasisUnited Kingdom, France, United States, Sweden, Spain, Turkey, Japan, Italy, Germany, Thailand, Ukraine
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedGlanzmann ThrombastheniaFrance