Novel Behavioral Intervention to Enhance Social Connections in Anxiety and Depression

August 26, 2020 updated by: Charles Taylor, University of California, San Diego

Novel Behavioral Intervention to Target Social Reward Sensitivity and Attachment

The overall goal of this project is to develop a novel transdiagnostic behavioral treatment -- social approach training -- intended to enhance positive social connections in individuals with elevated anxiety and/or depression. Social relationship impairments are pervasive and debilitating consequences of anxiety and depression. Existing treatments have some beneficial impact on social functioning; however, many people continue to have few and/or poor quality relationships following treatment, even after experiencing symptom relief. This study will evaluate the effects of social approach training on the brain systems that have been shown to be important for establishing positive connections with others. Approximately 60 individuals (ages 18-55) seeking treatment for anxiety or depression will participate in this study. Participants will be randomly assigned with equal probability to one of two versions of social approach training (5 or 10 sessions) or a waitlist (assessment only) control group. Participants will be assessed at baseline and post-treatment and compared on measures assessing brain responses to social reward (primary outcome), as well as physiological, behavioral, and emotional responses to social reward (secondary outcomes). It is hypothesized that participants assigned to social approach training will display greater increases from pre- to post-treatment in activity in brain systems that regulate the processing of social reward (e.g., striatum) relative to participants in the control group. This study will also determine whether the 5- vs. 10-session versions of the treatment program result in meaningful differences, compared to each other, in how the brain responds to social reward.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Score on the PHQ-9 is 10 or higher and/or score on the OASIS is 8 or higher.
  2. Social Connectedness Scale Revised (SCSR) < 90
  3. Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) - Social Domain ≥ 5
  4. Between the ages of 18-55, inclusive.
  5. Have sufficient proficiency in English language to understand and complete interviews, questionnaires, and all other study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No telephone or easy access to telephone.
  2. Any substance use disorder in the past year except subjects with mild alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, and marijuana use disorders will be permitted in the study.
  3. Bipolar I or Psychotic disorders.
  4. Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury with evidence of neurological deficits, neurological disorders, or severe or unstable medical conditions that might be compromised by participation in the study.
  5. Current and regular use (more days than not during the past 30 days) of a medication that could affect brain functioning, such as anxiolytics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, beta-blockers, sleep medications, opioids/codeine, migraine medications.
  6. MRI contraindications including: cardiac pacemaker, metal fragments in eyes/skin/body (shrapnel), aortic/aneurysm clips, prosthesis, by-pass surgery/coronary artery clips, hearing aid, heart valve replacement, shunt (ventricular or spinal), electrodes, metal plates/pins/screws/wires, or neuro/bio-stimulators (TENS unit), persons who have ever been a metal worker/welder, history of eye surgery/eyes washed out because of metal, vision problems uncorrectable with lenses, inability to lie still on one's back for 60 minutes; prior neurosurgery; tattoos with metal dyes, unwillingness to remove body piercings, and pregnancy.
  7. non-correctable vision or hearing problems, as some tests require intact sensory functioning.
  8. Concurrent psychosocial treatment: Participants completing ongoing empirically supported psychosocial treatment for the presenting problem will be required to meet 12-week stability criteria so that symptom changes as a result of other psychosocial treatments are not confounded with changes due to the research.
  9. Inability to complete the initial assessment battery or treatment sessions.
  10. Clinical conditions assessed by the interviewer that necessitate more imminent clinical care (e.g., active suicidal ideation): These criteria are in place so participants with these other, more several symptoms can be referred for appropriate mental health services.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
Experimental: Social Approach Training (5 sessions)
5 one-hour, clinician-administered treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Experimental: Social Approach Training (10 sessions)
10 one-hour, clinician-administered treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in neural activation during social reward processing
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from pre- to post-assessment in neural activation measured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during reward trials of the social incentive delay (SID) task
Baseline, 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in response to a social interaction task
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from pre- to post-assessment in physiology, behavior, motivation, and affect in response to a social interaction task
Baseline, 10 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in social connectedness as measured by the Social Connectedness Scale Revised (SCSR)
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The SCSR measures social connectedness. Items are answered on a 6 point scale, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 6 (Strongly agree). The SCSR ranges from 20-120 and higher scores indicate greater levels of social connectedness.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in functional impairment as measured by the Sheehan Disability Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Sheehan Disability Scale measures functional impairment. Items are rated on a 11 point scale, 0 (Not at all) to 10 (Extremely). The scale ranges from 0-30 and higher scores indicate higher levels of functional impairment.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in positive affect as measured by Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures positive affect. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The positive affect scale ranges from 10-50 and higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in positive affect as measured by Modified Differential Emotions Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) measures positive emotions. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 0 (Never/Not at all) to 4 (Most of the time/Extremely). Higher scores on the positive emotions sub-scale indicate higher levels of positive emotion.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in psychological well-being as measured by PROMIS General Life Satisfaction - Short Form 5a survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The PROMIS General Life Satisfaction - Short Form 5a survey measures psychological well-being. The PROMIS General Life Satisfaction items are answered on a 7 point scale, 1 (Strongly disagree) to 7 (Strongly agree). The PROMIS General Life Satisfaction survey ranges from 5-25 and higher scores indicate higher levels of life satisfaction.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in psychological well-being as measured by PROMIS Meaning and Purpose - Short Form 6a survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The PROMIS Meaning and Purpose - Short Form 6a survey measure psychological well-being. The PROMIS Meaning and Purpose items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). The PROMIS Meaning and Purpose survey ranges from 6-30 and higher scores indicate higher levels of self reported meaning and purpose in ones life.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in negative affect as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures negative affect. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The negative affect scale ranges from 10-50 and lower scores indicate lower levels of negative affect.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by PROMIS Anxiety 7a survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The PROMIS Anxiety 7a survey measures symptoms of anxiety. Items are rated on a 5 point scale, 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The scale ranges from 7-35 and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in depression as measured by PROMIS Depression 8b survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The PROMIS Depression 8b survey measures symptoms of depression. Items are rated on a 5 point scale, 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The scale ranges from 8-45 and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in social functioning as measured by the NIH Toolbox Companionship Friendship survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
NIH Toolbox Companionship Friendship survey measures social functioning. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The NIH Toolbox Companionship Friendship survey ranges from 8-40 and higher scores indicate greater perceived availability of friends or companions with whom to interact or affiliate.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in social functioning as measured by the NIH Toolbox Loneliness Surveys
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The NIH Toolbox Loneliness survey measures social functioning. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). The NIH Toolbox Loneliness survey ranges from 5-25 and higher scores indicate greater social isolation and feelings of loneliness.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in social functioning as measured by the Social Network Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Social Network Survey measures social functioning by looking at the size and density of a participants social network. Higher scores indicate greater levels of social functioning.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in positive affect as measured by PROMIS Positive Affect - Short Form 15a survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The PROMIS Positive Affect - Short Form 15a survey measures positive affect. Items are answered in a 5 point scale, 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Very much). The PROMIS Positive Affect - Short Form 15a survey ranges from 15-75 and higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in negative affect as measured by the Modified Differential Emotions Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) measures negative emotions. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 0 (Never/Not at all) to 4 (Most of the time/Extremely). Lower scores on the negative emotions sub-scale indicate lower levels of negative emotion.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in anxiety as measured by the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) measures frequency, severity, and functional impairment of anxiety symptoms. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, 0 (None) to 4 (Extreme). The scale ranges from 0-20 and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Baseline, 10 weeks
Change from baseline in depression as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Baseline, 10 weeks
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) measures depression symptoms. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). The scale ranges from 0-27 and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
Baseline, 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 140102

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Social Approach Training (5 sessions)

Subscribe