The Evolution of Visual Acuity Measured by Electronic Tablet / Computer of Exudative AMD Patients

July 10, 2017 updated by: Frédéric QUEGUINER, MD, Hospital St. Joseph, Marseille, France

A Prospective Study Comparing the Evolution of Visual Acuity Measured by Electronic Tablet or Computer and the Visual Acuity Measured by ETDRS in Patients Monitored and Treated for Exudative AMD

This pathology, DMLA, whose evolution is chronic, requires regular follow-up and care (IVTs) over a long period (several months or even years).

Increasing the number of patients to be followed and treated poses increasing problems for ophthalmologists to ensure regular follow-up of patients, followed by a need for satisfactory functional results.

Moreover, this regular follow-up imposes enormous constraints on patients and their families (some children or patients are still working).

Studies are beginning to emerge on the reliability of patient follow-up in telemedicine. The use of a measure of visual acuity by patients, Electronic Tablet (TE) or computer (O), and at home, seems a logical step to help us improve the quality of patient follow-up while spacing controls.

The aim of our study is thus to demonstrate that the measurement of the VA performed by TE or O is reliable. Indeed, during the follow-up of the patients, in the case where the patient's AV decreases, and whatever the reason

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Our aim is to compare the evolution curves of the Visual Acuity (AV) measured in each patient on Electronic Tablet (TE)/ computer(O) and on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, in order to check the reliability of the measurements performed by TE / O by comparing them with a well-known reference measure And is routinely practiced routinely in ophthalmology centers.

Measurement of visual acuity on TE / O will be carried out on an ETDRS AV scale, the size of the letters having been adapted to the reading distance (80 cm by 0.40 cm on the tablet). An ETDRS intermediate vision (EVI) or meadow vision (TEU) score according to the group will be established in the same way. The VA measurement will be supervised by a CRA trained to the extent of the VA, without the orthoptist or ophthalmologist being informed of the results obtained.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female over 50 years of age.
  • Patient monitored and treated in the department by intravitreal injections of anti VEGF (aflibercept or ranibizumab) in the indication of treatment.
  • Patient with exudative AMD
  • Patient who consented to participate in the study
  • Patient who is able to understand the study and use a TE / O
  • Patient with AV greater than or equal to 20/100
  • Patient affiliated to a health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient having expressed his / her refusal on the collection of the medical data of his file at the end of the study
  • Patient treated with non-AMD pathology
  • Patient with AV less than 20/100
  • Vulnerable person: protected by the law: guardianship, curatorship.
  • Person participating in another test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: electronc tablet

On ET or Computer, the AV is measured at a closer distance (40 cm and 80 cm, respectively). At this closer distance (ie near and near vision), the eccentric fixation is much more Difficult to perform, unnatural, often requiring learning in the context of low vision rehabilitation.

Our aim is to compare the evolution curves of the Visual Acuity (AV) measured in each patient on Electronic Tablet (TE)/ computer(O) and on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, in order to check the reliability of the measurements performed by TE / O by comparing them with a well-known reference measure And is routinely practiced routinely in ophthalmology centers.

By comparing the evolution of the curves, the investigator can confirm that the AV measured on ET / Computer can be an interesting and useful element to help us follow up our patients and improve the quality of life's patients by decreasing the number of visits control.
By comparing the evolution of the curves, the investigator can confirm that the AV measured on ET / Computer can be an interesting and useful element to help us follow up our patients and improve the quality of life's patients by decreasing the number of visits control.
Active Comparator: computer

On ET or Computer, the AV is measured at a closer distance (40 cm and 80 cm, respectively). At this closer distance (ie near and near vision), the eccentric fixation is much more Difficult to perform, unnatural, often requiring learning in the context of low vision rehabilitation.

Our aim is to compare the evolution curves of the Visual Acuity (AV) measured in each patient on Electronic Tablet (TE)/ computer(O) and on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale, in order to check the reliability of the measurements performed by TE / O by comparing them with a well-known reference measure And is routinely practiced routinely in ophthalmology centers.

By comparing the evolution of the curves, the investigator can confirm that the AV measured on ET / Computer can be an interesting and useful element to help us follow up our patients and improve the quality of life's patients by decreasing the number of visits control.
By comparing the evolution of the curves, the investigator can confirm that the AV measured on ET / Computer can be an interesting and useful element to help us follow up our patients and improve the quality of life's patients by decreasing the number of visits control.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Day 0
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Day 0
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 1
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Month 1
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 2
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Month 2
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 3
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Month 3
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 4
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Month 4
Visual acuity
Time Frame: Month 5
Visual acuity will be evaluated by Electronic Tablet (TE) and Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS scale) for the first group of patients, and by computer (O) and ETDRS for the second group of patients.
Month 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sight Study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration Exudative Eye Bilateral

Clinical Trials on By comparing the evolution of the visual acuity curves.

Subscribe