Trial on Oral Appliance Design for Improving Upper Airway Function and Sleep Quality

January 6, 2022 updated by: Emet D. Schneiderman, PhD, Texas A&M University

Mid-line Traction Versus Bilateral Thrust Oral Appliances: A Trial to Determine Superiority for Improving Upper Airway Function and Sleep Quality

This study will compare the effectiveness of the two leading oral appliances (OAs) designs for the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea in overweight adults. The effectiveness of OAs has come under question since different designs are combined in evaluating treatment efficacy, for example when comparing them to continuous positive airway pressure Due to the wide range of reported efficacy (53 to 90%), it is of great value to identify the most effective design to guide sleep practitioners and patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The two prominent oral appliances used in treating obstructive sleep apnea differ in their designs, mid-line traction versus bilateral thrust. From a clinical perspective, it is important to know which design is superior and should be the 'treatment of choice' for improving airway function and sleep quality. These two designs differ in their protrusive mechanisms that are categorized in general under four main types: bilateral compression, bilateral thrust, midline compression and mid-line traction. Although the two designs considered in this proposal have undergone the most rigorous testing individually, well controlled 'head-to-head' trials as proposed here have not been conducted to determine their efficacy within a single test population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
        • Texas A&M University College of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OSA PSG or PG diagnosed adults within 1 year
  • age >18
  • Currently treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)
  • AHI ≥ >30 events/hour of sleep
  • Two or more OSA symptoms (snoring, witnessed apnea or daytime hypersomnolence complaint)
  • BMI ≥ 30
  • At least 8 teeth per arch to support either OA device
  • Central and mixed apnea index <5 events/hour
  • Mallampati score from I to III
  • Palatine tonsils - grade 0, 1, or 2
  • Consent to study's timeline
  • Willingness to wear home sleep test apparatus for at least 4 nights
  • Willingness to wear an oral appliance every night for 8 weeks
  • Willingness to pick up and return home sleep test kits as needed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac & pulmonary disease (e.g., congestive heart failure, severe arrhythmias, COPD);
  • Central sleep apnea;
  • Comorbidities with other sleep disorders
  • No active TMD or jaw muscle pain
  • Morphological airway abnormalities
  • Pre-existing difficulty swallowing; throat or neck related health issues
  • Endocrine dysfunction
  • Severe psychiatric disorders;
  • Previous OA therapy; ENT surgery
  • Restrictions in jaw opening
  • Pregnancy / breast feeding or intent to become pregnant during the study
  • Inability to apply the sleep recorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Oral appliance - A

Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible.

Trade Name: "TAP1" Oral Appliance, Airway Management Inc. Dallas, TX

Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible. 1 week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs.
Other Names:
  • "TAP1" Oral Appliance; washout; "SomnoDent Flex"
Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs. 1-week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible.
Other Names:
  • "SomnoDent Flex"; washout; "TAP1"
Experimental: Oral appliance - B

Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs.

Trade name: "SomnoDent Flex" Oral Appliance, SomnoMed Inc., Plano TX

Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible. 1 week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs.
Other Names:
  • "TAP1" Oral Appliance; washout; "SomnoDent Flex"
Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs. 1-week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible.
Other Names:
  • "SomnoDent Flex"; washout; "TAP1"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Event Index (REI) at T2
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of apneas and hypopneas (respiratory events) per hour of recording; REI was reported instead of AHI, as it is a more appropriate measure for home sleep testing.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stable Sleep Percent
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Percent of stable sleep during the recording, specifically the percentage of high frequency coupling (HFC%) from cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) Analysis
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on oral appliance - A ; washout; oral appliance B

Subscribe