Characterizing Upper Airway Collapse to Guide Patient Selection for Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

February 23, 2022 updated by: David Andrew Wellman, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Characterizing Site and Severity of Upper Airway Collapse to Guide Patient Selection for Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) is characterized by collapse of one or more pharyngeal structures during sleep (velum, tongue base, lateral walls, epiglottis). Structure-specific therapies for OSA have emerged as alternatives to positive airway pressure (PAP). Oral appliance (OA) therapy is increasingly being indicated for OSA treatment, although a complete response occurs in approximately 50% of patients. In general, OA devices are designed to maintain the mandible and/or tongue in a protruded posture during sleep, preventing upper airway obstruction. Limited studies in awake or sedated patients have demonstrated the effects of mandibular advancement on aspects of pharyngeal structure and function. The objective of the proposed research is to fully characterize upper airway collapse in OSA patients during natural sleep and use this information to understand why some patients appear to exhibit a large improvement in pharyngeal collapsibility whereas others do not.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OSA patients will undergo a baseline sleep endoscopy study to identify the site of pharyngeal collapse. Subsequently, they will undergo two clinical polysomnographies (PSGs) to measure the effect of an oral appliance (a site specific therapy) on upper airway collapsibility and sleep apnea severity. During the first hour of each clinical PSG, the passive pharyngeal collapsibility will be determined using the standard 5-breath continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) drop method. During the remainder of the night, patients will be monitored to determine sleep apnea severity (apnea-hypopnea index). These measurements will allow the investigators to determine which pharyngeal collapsing site responds best (both in terms of collapsibility and AHI) to mandibular advancement with an oral appliance. Patients who have their own oral appliance will be recruited. In addition, patients without an oral appliance will be provided with a temporary oral appliance for the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any unstable cardiac condition (other than well controlled hypertension) or pulmonary problems.
  • Any medication known to influence breathing, sleep/arousal or muscle physiology
  • Concurrent sleep disorders (insomnia, narcolepsy, central sleep apnea or parasomnia)
  • Claustrophobia
  • Inability to sleep supine
  • Periodontal disease and/or insufficient number of teeth
  • Allergy to lidocaine or oxymetazoline hydrochloride
  • For women: Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
No oral appliance (control) first, oral appliance (BluePro oral appliance or other device) second
Experimental: Oral appliance
oral appliance (BluePro oral appliance or other device) first, no oral appliance (control) second
Patients will bring their prescribed oral appliance.
Patients without a prescribed oral appliance will have a device provided for the duration of the study (BluePro, BlueSom; used for investigational purposes only). The device provided is a prefabricated thermoplastic customizable mandibular advancement splint.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in passive pharyngeal collapsibility (OA therapy minus control)
Time Frame: 3 nights

The passive pressure-flow relationship is characterized by the critical closing pressure (Pcrit) , and the ventilatory flow at atmospheric pressure ( V passive). Pcrit and V passive will be determined using the standard 5-breath CPAP drop method.

The change in collapsibility will be compared across subgroups defined by the site of collapse measured using sleep-endoscopy. Patients will sleep supine for this measurement.

3 nights
Change in sleep apnea severity (AHI)
Time Frame: 2 nights
The change in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI, 3% desaturation or arousal criteria; OA therapy minus control) will be compared across subgroups defined by the site of collapse measured using sleep-endoscopy. Baseline collapsibility will be incorporated as a predictor of the change in AHI.
2 nights

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in peak flow during sleep (OA therapy minus control)
Time Frame: 2 nights
During the portion of the night dedicated to measuring sleep apnea severity, peak flow will also be measured during sleep to quantify activated upper airway collapsibility.
2 nights
Objective sleep quality (OA therapy minus control)
Time Frame: 2 nights
Arousal index, one of the standard measures of sleep quality, will be assessed.
2 nights
Objective sleep quality (OA therapy minus control)
Time Frame: 2 nights
Proportion of sleep in Non rapid eyes movement ( NREM) stage 1,one of the standard measures of sleep quality, will be assessed.
2 nights
Subjective sleep quality (OA therapy minus control)
Time Frame: 2 nights
Patients will rate whether they slept better/worse/same with the OA vs control.
2 nights

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David A Wellman, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Oral appliance

3
Subscribe