Algorithm of Muscle Function Tests to Detect Residual Neuromuscular Blockade.

July 12, 2017 updated by: Christoph Unterbuchner, University of Regensburg

Development of an Algorithm Using Clinical Tests to Avoid Post-operative Residual Neuromuscular Block

Objective neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologist just use qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this study is to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring is the gold standard to detect postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Many anesthesiologists, however, use insensitive, qualitative neuromuscular monitoring or unreliable, clinical tests. Goal of this multicentre, prospective, double-blinded, assessor controlled study is to develop an algorithm of muscle function tests to identify PORC.

Methods: After extubation a blinded anesthetist performs eight clinical tests in 165 patients. Test results are correlated to calibrated electromyography train-of-four (TOF) ratio and to a postoperatively applied uncalibrated acceleromyography. A classification and regression tree (CART) is calculated developing the algorithm to identify PORC. This is validated against uncalibrated acceleromyography and tactile judgement of TOF fading in separate 100 patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

265

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • 6Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel,
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Münster
      • Reutlingen, Germany, 72764
        • Klinik für Anaesthesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum am Steinenberg, Steinenbergstr. 31, 72764 Reutlingen, Germany
      • Rostock, Germany, 18057
        • Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivtherapie, Universität Rostock

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: The patients were scheduled for elective low risk surgical procedures:

  • laparoscopic abdominal procedures
  • orthopedic
  • minor visceral surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participation in another study
  • body mass index over 30
  • history of neuromuscular diseases
  • gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Electromyography
Neuromuscular function was monitored, using evoked electromyography of the adductor pollicis muscle with a neuromuscular transmission module by a non-blinded investigator.
EXPERIMENTAL: Acceleromyography
Immediately after extubation the blinded anaesthesiologist tested with an uncalibrated acceleromyography on the contralateral arm.
Use of an uncalibrated acceleromyography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical muscle function tests
Time Frame: Muscle function tests are performed immediately after extubation.

Measurement of postoperative residual curarisation with clinical muscle function test:

  • time able to open the eyes
  • appearence of diplopic images
  • time able to stick out the tongue
  • spatula pressure test
  • time able to lift the head
  • time able to lift the arm
  • strength of the patient pressing the investigator's hand
  • ability to swallow 20 ml of water
Muscle function tests are performed immediately after extubation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Uncalibrated acceleromyography
Time Frame: Uncalibrated acceleromyography is measured immediately after extubation.
Contralateral to the electromyography arm an uncalibrated acceleremyography measures objectively postoperative residual curarisation by examination of the train of four ratio.
Uncalibrated acceleromyography is measured immediately after extubation.
Qualitative neuromuscular measurement
Time Frame: Qualitative acceleromyography is measured immediately after extubation.
Contralateral to the electromyography arm qualitative tactile judgement of the train of four stimulation was measured by acceleremyography to scale postoperative residual curarisation.
Qualitative acceleromyography is measured immediately after extubation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • N° 1783/ 07

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Residual Curarization

Clinical Trials on Acceleromyography

3
Subscribe