Evaluating Household Visits and Small Groups to Increase Contraception Use Among Married Adolescent Girls in Rural Niger (IMPACT-RMA)

February 22, 2023 updated by: Jay G. Silverman, PhD, University of California, San Diego
This study entails a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods (i.e., complementary quantitative and qualitative) outcome evaluation to assess the efficacy of the Reaching Married Adolescents (RMA) Interventions developed and implemented by Pathfinder International to increase contraception use and contraception use intentions among married adolescent girls ages 13-19 in three rural districts of the Dosso region of Niger. Intervention models (gender-synchronized household visits and small groups) will be tested using a randomized 4-arm outcome evaluation design; Arm 1 will receive household visits, Arm 2 will receive small groups; Arm 3 will receive household visits plus small groups, and Arm 4 will serve as the control group and will not receive any intervention. The quantitative component will consist of collecting quantitative baseline, 16-months follow-up, and 27-months survey data from randomly selected married adolescent girls (n=1200) and their husbands (n=1200) who are participating in each Arm of the study. Qualitative elements will include ethnography at two time points and semi-structured in-depth interviews half way through intervention implementation. A costing and cost effectiveness analysis will also be conducted to evaluate which intervention provides the largest gain in the primary outcomes for each dollar spent.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study entails a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods (i.e., complementary quantitative and qualitative) outcome evaluation to assess the efficacy of the Reaching Married Adolescents (RMA) Interventions to increase contraception use and contraception use intentions among married adolescent girls ages 13-19 in three rural districts of the Dosso region of Niger. Two intervention models (gender-synchronized household visits and small groups) will be tested using a randomized 4-arm outcome evaluation design; Arm 1 will receive household visits, Arm 2 will receive small groups; Arm 3 will receive household visits plus small groups, and Arm 4 will serve as the control group and will not receive any intervention. The quantitative component will consist of collecting quantitative baseline and 16-months follow-up survey data from randomly selected married adolescent girls (n=1200) and their husbands (n=1200) who are participating in each Arm of the study. Qualitative elements will include ethnography at two time points and semi-structured in-depth interviews half way through intervention implementation. A costing and cost effectiveness analysis will also be conducted to evaluate which intervention provides the largest gain in the primary outcomes for each dollar spent.

Quasi-Experimental Quantitative Evaluation Design. The 4-arm RMA outcome evaluation will take place across 48 villages clustered within the 3 districts (i.e., 16 villages per district) in the Dosso region of Niger; specifically, Loga, Doutchi and Dosso. Each of the 3 districts will be assigned to 1 of the 3 intervention conditions. Within each district, 16 comparable villages (i.e., rural, Hausa or Zarma-speaking, at least 1000 inhabitants, similar wealth distribution profile, and located within the specified range of distance from health facilities providing effective contraception) will be randomly selected to be assigned to either the district-specific intervention arm or to the control condition. A stratified randomization approach will be used, in which villages will be stratified into two groups based on the village having or not having a health center co-located in their village. Specifically, within each district, 8 villages will be randomly selected among those that have a co-located health center, and 8 villages will be randomly selected from among those villages that do not have a co-located health center (all within the parameters listed above). Within each of these 2 groupings of 8 villages, 2 villages will be randomly selected to be assigned to the control arm. Thus, 12 villages will be assigned to the intervention and 4 will be assigned to serve as control villages in each district. Each village will act as a cluster, with the unit of analysis being the married female adolescent (ages 13-19 years).

Qualitative Evaluation Design. This evaluation study will employ qualitative methods to complement the proposed quantitative evaluation design. The first method employed will be ethnography (i.e., participant observation, in-depth interviewing, informal discussions) to explore the processes related to changing understanding, intentions and behaviors related to use of modern contraception in the context of participating in the RMA interventions. Three villages in Arm 3 receiving the full complement of the RMA programs (i.e., male and female household visits, and male and female groups) will be the source for ethnographic observational field notes, informal group discussion field notes, and informal interview field notes. Three pairs of trained, local research assistants (6 total; 2 per village) will live with families of adolescent wife participants who are living in three separate villages and will participate in the daily life of the families and broader community (cooking, cleaning, farming, etc.) for a period of two month total, one month corresponding with 3 months and 14 months after program initiation. Research assistants will observe but not participate in household visit and small group interventions. Additionally, they will conduct informal, open-ended interviews and consultations with key respondents throughout the community (male and female RMA participants, older adults including in-laws, local political, business and religious leaders).

Findings of the ethnographic phase will inform a semi-structured interview phase to capture narratives regarding intervention acceptability and the roles of the RMA program in increased knowledge, altered intention and changed behaviors regarding decisions on use of modern contraception, inclusive of a focus on issues of gender equity and persistent barriers to contraception acceptance and use. Forty-eight adolescent wives and husbands of adolescent wives participating in the RMA program, and key informants (e.g., village leaders, health providers, etc.) from intervention Arms 1 and 2 will provide semi-structured interview data (n=24 interviews per study arm). Semi-structured interviews (60 minutes) will be conducted approximately 8 months after implementation is initiated. These data will, in turn, inform the foci of the second round of ethnography to be collected at 14 months post program initiation.

Costing and cost-effectiveness will be calculated for each study arm. If one or more intervention arms are found to be effective at increasing contraception use or intention to use contraception, the investigators will compare the cost effectiveness of achieving the outcomes using the WHO-CHOICE methodology.

The study will take place over the course of 4 years total; rolling recruitment and baseline data collection will take place over a period of 3 months, the intervention will be implemented across 16 months with a rolling start and finish, follow-up (27 months) and endline (45 months) data collection will take place over 3 months. Qualitative ethnography data collection will take place at two time periods; at 3 months and 14 months after intervention implementation begins, one month at each time point. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted approximately half-way between the beginning and end of the intervention implementation, in month 8.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2898

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Niamey, Niger
        • Pathfinder International
    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For Women:

  • Married
  • 13-19 years old
  • Fluent in Hausa or Zarma
  • Residing in the village where recruitment is taking place with no plans to move away in next 18 months or plan to travel for more than 6 months during that period
  • Providing informed consent.

For Men:

  • Must be the husband to an eligible adolescent participating in the study
  • Hausa or Zarma speaking
  • Providing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

For Women:

  • Plans to move away in next 18 months or plans to travel for more than 6 months during that period;
  • Currently sterilized (to enable measurement of changes in use of temporary methods of contraception from baseline to 16-months follow-up)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1: Household Visits
Arm 1 will receive gender synchronized household visits (i.e., visits by a female community health worker to the participating married adolescent female and visits by a male community health worker to the participating husband of the married adolescent female). Approximately 10-12 visits with wives and 4-6 visits with husbands are expected to take place over the course of the project. Study Arms 1-3 will additionally receive community enabling environment activities and adolescent-specific service delivery activities to support adolescent contraception use. Community enabling environment activities will include engaging religious leaders, community leaders, and familial gatekeepers of the married adolescent wives, such as in-laws, in community dialogues on a monthly basis.
Household visits will be conducted to build trust in the health system, educate regarding different forms of modern contraception, (how administered, how they work, availability), dispel related myths (i.e., those regarding infertility), promote the health advantages of birth spacing, and create related dialogue among adolescent wives and other household members present during these visits. The relais will provide and resupply oral contraceptive pills and condoms to interested participants and will accompany the married adolescent to the nearest health facility for other forms of contraception, if requested to do so. To complement the household visits to married female adolescents, male relais will conduct home visits to discuss healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy with husbands of adolescent females, provide education on different forms of contraception, and discuss concerns husbands may have regarding use of contraception.
Experimental: Arm 2: Small Groups
This arm will receive, in addition to the community-level components, gender synchronized group-based interventions (i.e., separate group-based interventions for husbands of adolescent wives and adolescent wives, themselves). Male-only and female-only small groups for participating husbands and wives will be held separately on bimonthly and monthly intervals, respectively. In this project, each small group will consist of 10-15 participants and will be held in places participants have deemed safe spaces (e.g., a place that has auditory and visual privacy, is safe for girls to walk to, has been designated by community leaders as a protected place for girls to meet). Approximately 8-10 female small groups and 4-6 male groups are expected to take place over the course of the project.
In the wife-only groups, adolescent wives will be convened by trained adult female community members to learn and discuss a broad range of gender and health-related topics, with a focus on modern contraception, and cultivate self-efficacy, social support and life skills. The small groups will be led by trained female small group mentors who are trained peers and will follow a designated curriculum consisting of different topics each week developed by Pathfinder International and derived from Population Council/UNFPA's Safe Spaces curriculum. The husband groups will follow a curriculum adapted from Promundo's Program P6 and supplemented by the tools and activities developed by Pathfinder International. These groups of husbands will focus on fostering reflection and dialogue to contribute to more equitable gender norms, support for contraception use for HTSP, positive health seeking behavior for them and their families, and increased couples communication and joint SRH decision-making.
Experimental: Arm 3: Household Visits + Small Groups
In addition to the community enabling environment components, this arm will receive a combination of household visit and small groups intervention components, as described above for Arms 1 and 2, in order to understand the combined effect of these two interventions on the outcomes of interest.
Household visits will be conducted to build trust in the health system, educate regarding different forms of modern contraception, (how administered, how they work, availability), dispel related myths (i.e., those regarding infertility), promote the health advantages of birth spacing, and create related dialogue among adolescent wives and other household members present during these visits. The relais will provide and resupply oral contraceptive pills and condoms to interested participants and will accompany the married adolescent to the nearest health facility for other forms of contraception, if requested to do so. To complement the household visits to married female adolescents, male relais will conduct home visits to discuss healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy with husbands of adolescent females, provide education on different forms of contraception, and discuss concerns husbands may have regarding use of contraception.
In the wife-only groups, adolescent wives will be convened by trained adult female community members to learn and discuss a broad range of gender and health-related topics, with a focus on modern contraception, and cultivate self-efficacy, social support and life skills. The small groups will be led by trained female small group mentors who are trained peers and will follow a designated curriculum consisting of different topics each week developed by Pathfinder International and derived from Population Council/UNFPA's Safe Spaces curriculum. The husband groups will follow a curriculum adapted from Promundo's Program P6 and supplemented by the tools and activities developed by Pathfinder International. These groups of husbands will focus on fostering reflection and dialogue to contribute to more equitable gender norms, support for contraception use for HTSP, positive health seeking behavior for them and their families, and increased couples communication and joint SRH decision-making.
No Intervention: Arm 4: Control
The fourth arm will serve as the control condition. Individuals in these villages will not receive the household, small group, or community-enabling environment intervention components.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contraception Use Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in use of effective methods of contraception (methods assessed individually)
baseline and 18 month follow up
Intentions to Use Contraception Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in behavioral intentions regarding effective contraceptive use (next 3 months)
baseline and 18 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social norms regarding gender equity Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in social norms regarding husband physical and sexual violence toward wives, women's autonomy and husband control related to family life
baseline and 18 month follow up
Female Empowerment Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in autonomy, decision-making, freedom from violence and control, especially with regard to contraceptive use
baseline and 18 month follow up
Knowledge of effective contraceptive methods Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in knowledge of effective contraceptive methods, mechanisms, and common side effects
baseline and 18 month follow up
Acceptance of effective contraceptive methods Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline and 18 month follow up
Change in attitudes and beliefs regarding use of contraceptive methods for birth spacing
baseline and 18 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jay G Silverman, PhD, Center on Gender Equity and Health, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Contraception

Clinical Trials on Household Visits

3
Subscribe