Two-Lumen Catheterization For Lung Wedge Resection

November 10, 2018 updated by: Wen-zhao ZHONG

Two-Lumen Catheterization Versus Chest Tube Placement in Patients With Lung Wedge Resection: A Prospective Randomized Trial

This study evaluates the viability and safety of two-lumen catheterization versus chest tube placement in patients with lung wedge resection. Half of participants will receive routine chest tube placement, while the other half will receive a two-lumen central venous catheterization along the midclavicular line, second intercostal space for remedial gas-remove.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With the development of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques, minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved considerably over the last three decades. The concept of "tubeless" involves non-intubated anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation and no chest tube placement. Chest tube placement always causes pain, and its duration is known to be one of the most important factors influencing hospital stay and costs. Early tube removal allows patients to breathe deeply with less pain, which leads to more compliance with chest physiotherapy, as demonstrated by a concomitant improvement in patients' ventilatory function. Hence, more and more experienced surgeons choose the omission of chest tube placement after lung wedge resection. However, based on previous retrospective studies, residual pneumothorax was noted in about 10~40% cases, and some of them need re-intervention. Hence, the investigators designed a intra-operative two-lumen catheterization for remedial gas-remove. Therefore, this study evaluates the viability and safety of two-lumen catheterization versus chest tube placement in patients with lung wedge resection.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 51000
        • Recruiting
        • Guangdong General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Preoperative radiology revealed solitary peripheral pulmonary nodule, with both size and depth less than 3 cm
  2. Lung wedge resection for tumor biopsy to elucidate drug resistant mechanism or confirm diagnosis

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous ipsilateral thoracic surgery or extensive adhesion
  2. Preoperative radiology revealed pneumonia or atelectasis
  3. Any unstable systemic disease (including active infection, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the previous year, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication, hepatic, renal, or metabolic disease).
  4. Bleeding tendency or anticoagulant use
  5. Pregnancy or breast feeding
  6. Patient who can not sign permit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: chest tube
VATS with chest tube placement
VATS with chest tube placement
Experimental: two-lumen catheter
VATS with two-lumen catheterization
VATS with two-lumen catheterization long the midclavicular line, second intercostal space
central venous catheter(two-lumen 7-Fr-20cm)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative adverse event incidence rate
Time Frame: 1 months
To evaluate the incidence rate of pneumothorax (a pneumothorax greater than 2.0 cm on X-ray) or pleural effusion (>800ml) in both groups.
1 months
Length of post-operative hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 week
To evaluate the length of post-operative hospital stay
1 week
Rate of post-operative related complications
Time Frame: 1 week
To evaluate the rate of post-operative related complications within 7 days of surgery
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pneumoderm incidence rate
Time Frame: 3 days
To evaluate the postoperative pneumoderm incidence rate in both groups.
3 days
The time of post-operative extubation
Time Frame: 1 week
To evaluate the time of duration of chest tube or catheterization.
1 week
Postoperative pulmonary function recovery
Time Frame: 1 week
To evaluate the postoperative cardiopulmonary function recovery via 6-minute walk test in both groups.
1 week
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: 1 day
To evaluate the pain score via NRS pain scale first day after surgery.
1 day
Postoperative wound satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month
To evaluate the post-operative wound healing condition .
1 month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characteristics of plasma exosome for the solitary pulmonary nodules
Time Frame: 1 month
We prospectively collect the preoperative plasma sample of patients with solitary pulmonary nodule in this study to determine the diagnostic value and molecular characteristics of plasma exosome-derived miRNAs for these patients.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wen-Zhao Zhong, Ph.D, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TBL-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted

Clinical Trials on chest tube

Subscribe