A PROMs Based Educational Tool (PROM-DA) for Patients Considering Total Knee Arthroplasty

April 24, 2020 updated by: University of Calgary

A PROMs Based Educational Tool (PROM-DA) for Patients Considering Total Knee Arthroplasty: Development and a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

The primary objectives of this study are to: 1) develop an educational tool known as the Patient Reported Outcome Measure informed Decision Aid (PROM-DA) that will describe the options for patients considering total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery, and help them imagine what to expect if they choose either option; 2) assess the extent that the PROM-DA improves patients decision quality; 3) determine the feasibility of a larger trial to test the PROM-DA in multiple sites and more patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5E 5R8
        • Edmonton Bone and Joint Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (age≥30) patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA)
  • Have an appointment with a surgeon for consultation about Total Knee Arthroplasty at the Edmonton Bone and Joint Centre
  • Understands, speaks and reads English; and
  • Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who have had prior total knee arthroplasty
  • Physician-diagnosed Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Fibromyalgia, or Gout.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Group
(completed online)
(PROM-DA)
Placebo Comparator: Non Treatment Group
Conventional information
(completed online)
(usual care)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decision quality
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Hip and Knee Decision Quality Instrument (HK-DQI)
40 to 52 weeks after baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (generic)
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Euroqol Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Quality of life (condition-specific)
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Depression
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Knowledge about total knee arthroplasty surgery
Time Frame: Baseline
HK-DQI
Baseline
Values
Time Frame: Baseline
HK-DQI
Baseline
Decisional conflict
Time Frame: Baseline
Decisional Conflict Scale (SURE)
Baseline
Treatment Preference
Time Frame: Baseline

Single item question: Do you feel the potential benefits of knee replacement surgery outweigh the potential surgical risks?

Yes No Unsure

Baseline
Preference for involvement in decision making
Time Frame: Baseline
Control Preferences Scale (CPS)
Baseline
Willingness to have surgery
Time Frame: Baseline

Single item question: Based on your current understanding of the risks and benefits of knee replacement surgery of your knee arthritis, what is your current preference between having joint replacement surgery or non-surgical treatments?

I would definitely consider having knee joint replacement surgery now. I would probably consider having knee joint replacement surgery now. I am not sure. I would probably not consider having knee joint replacement surgery now. I would definitely not consider having knee joint replacement surgery now.

Baseline
Patient-reported shared decision-making
Time Frame: 3 to 6 weeks after baseline
CollaboRATE
3 to 6 weeks after baseline
Decisional regret
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Decision Regret Scale
40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Satisfaction with knee replacement surgery
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline

Three item questionnaire:

  1. Overall, how satisfied are you with the results of your knee replacement surgery?
  2. How satisfied are you with your knee replacement surgery for reducing your pain when walking on a flat surface? Going up or down stairs? Sitting or lying down?
  3. How satisfied are you with your most recent knee replacement surgery for improving your ability to perform five functions: Going up stairs? Getting in/out of a car or on/off a bus? Rising from bed? Lying in bed? Performing light domestic duties?

Responses from 'very dissatisfied' to ' very satisfied'

40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Expectations
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Single item question from Bourne et al. 2010. Clin Orthop Relat Res. related to whether expectations were met; not met; or whether they had no expectations.
40 to 52 weeks after baseline
Surgical consult
Time Frame: 1 to 4 weeks after baseline
Electronic Medical Records (EMR)
1 to 4 weeks after baseline
Surgery
Time Frame: 27 to 30 weeks after baseline
EMR
27 to 30 weeks after baseline
Concordance
Time Frame: 40 to 52 weeks after baseline
HK-DQI
40 to 52 weeks after baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REB16-0869

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Baseline and Follow-up Surveys

Subscribe