A Trial of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs

August 9, 2017 updated by: Jamie Zoellner, PhD RD, University of Virginia

A Randomized-controlled Trial to Compare the Reach, Effectiveness and Maintenance of Two Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programs in a Medically Underserved Region

The primary aim is to determine the relative effectiveness in child BMI z-scores at 3, 6, and 12-months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections. Secondary aims are to determine (1) ongoing reach, fidelity, and implementation costs, (2) community capacity for implementation and sustainability, (3) relative impact on family eating/physical activity and parental weight, and (4) relative adherence and potential dose response relationships.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

In partnership with the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team, with a goal to improve the magnitude of weight reductions and increase the likelihood of iChoose sustainability in the community, the investigators propose to test iChoose+ that will (1) extend iChoose to a 6-month program, followed by 12 bi-weekly maintenance telephone calls, congruent with the 12-month Bright Bodies program duration, (2) formalize a Parent Health Advisory model of previous iChoose families to serve as a 'peer support safety net' for new program participants, and (3) deliver support calls using interactive voice response (IVR) automation to reduce the burden on community stakeholder implementation. When reflecting on and interpreting the outcomes of the previous planning grant, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team also identified the need to use a study design that allowed all participants the opportunity to benefit and, with this in mind, to test alternative family-based childhood obesity program options that improve reach within the broad Dan River Region population of minority, low-income, and geographically dispersed families. Thus, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team returned to a potential option for delivery that was considered earlier in the planning grant process and was rated highly for scalability- Family Connections, an adaptation of Golan's Home Environmental Change model that focuses exclusively on parents as the agents of change. When compared to iChoose+ (12 bi-weekly sessions & 24 IVR calls/12 months), Family Connections has fewer sessions and fewer IVR support calls over a shorter period of time (2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart & 10 IVR calls/6 months), delivers intervention to parents only, and promotes physical activity, but does not include structured exercise sessions. Still, in previous studies Family Connections led to significant reductions in child weight status, though smaller in magnitude than Bright Bodies, that were sustained 6-month post intervention completion. Committed to the goal of allowing all participating families an opportunity to benefit from study participation and the need for a sustainable family-based childhood obesity option, the Community Advisory Board and Parent Advisory Team propose a comparative effectiveness trial where eligible families will be randomly assigned to: (1) iChoose+ (n=87) or to (2) Family Connections (n=87). Given the need to optimize program enrollment, participation, and retention in each program, both iChoose+ and Family Connections will include Parent Health Advisor support63-68 as refined by the Parent Advisory Team. The primary aim is to determine the relative changes in child BMI z-scores at 6 months post baseline of iChoose+ versus Family Connections, though additional assessments will occur at 3 and 12 months post baseline. Secondary aims include (1) determine ongoing reach, fidelity, and costs of implementation, (2) assess community capacity to implement and sustain childhood obesity programs, (3) determine impact on family eating and physical activity and parental weight by intervention, and (4) assess the adherence by intervention and potential dose response relationships. The primary study hypotheses are: (a) children in both conditions will reduce BMI-z scores significantly, when compared to baseline at 3, 6 and 12 months, but iChoose+ reductions will be significantly larger than Family Connections, (b) reach-the sample will be representative of the eligible regional population on demographic and behavioral factors, (c) implementation-the intervention components will be delivered with high fidelity in both conditions, but costs will be lower for Family Connections, (d) maintenance-a sustainability action plan will be completed to include strategies for continued delivery of iChoose+ and/or Family Connections (outcome dependent), (e) parent weight, parent/child behaviors, & tertiary outcomes that follow the same patterns as BMI z-scores, and (f), community capacity for implementing and sustaining a locally relevant FBCO treatment and maintenance program will remain high over time.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

348

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jamie M Zoellner, PhD, RD
  • Phone Number: 434-962-4488
  • Email: jz9q@virginia.edu

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908-0717
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 12 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent/child dyads will be eligible for participation if they reside in the Dan River Region

    • English speaking
    • child with a BMI percentile ranking of 85 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children with a major cognitive impairment and parents or children with a medical contraindication for moderate physical activity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: iChoose
12 bi-weekly sessions & 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only
12 bi-weekly sessions & 24 IVR calls/12 months, 24 physical activity sessions over 6 months; delivers intervention to parents and children only
EXPERIMENTAL: Family Connections
2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart & 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only
2 in-person sessions spaced one week apart & 10 IVR calls/6 months, promotes physical activity but does not include structured exercise sessions; delivers intervention to parents only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
child BMI z-score
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
parent BMI
Time Frame: 6-month
6-month
child self-reported diet, physical activity, quality of life, health literacy
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months
child self-reported diet, physical activity, quality of life, health literacy, home environment
Time Frame: 6-months
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

May 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity, Childhood

Clinical Trials on iChoose

3
Subscribe