Role of EUS in High Risk of Choledocholithiasis

March 15, 2021 updated by: Woo Hyun Paik
The aim of this study is to demonstrate that patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis who undergo ERCP only for patients with choledocholith in the EUS examination[EUS-ERCP group] have less negative outcomes (including false-negative results and procedure-related complications) than patients who undergo ERCP in all patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis[ERCP group]. The primary outcome is the incidence of negative outcomes (including false-negative results and procedure-related complications) in both groups. The secondary outcomes included days of hospitalization and the rate of diagnostic ERC.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Several studies have shown that EUS testing prior to ERCP may reduce ERCP complications in patients with intermediate-risk choledocholithiasis. In other words, this results obtained by not performing ERCP in patients without choledocholith in the EUS examination. However, to the best of our knowledge, no prospective study has been conducted on the role of EUS in patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis. Therefore, we investigate the role of EUS screening in patients with high risk of choledocholithiasis. We compare the negative outcomes (including false negative and procedure-related complications of EUS and ERCP) of the 'EUS-ERCP group' in which ERCP is performed when necessary after the EUS examination and the 'ERCP group' in which ERCP is performed in all patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Abdominal CT or US showed a common bile duct diameter > 6mm (>8mm in patients with previous cholecystectomy) and elevated total bilirubin from 1.8mg/dL to less than 4.0mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe mental illness
  • Severe co-morbidity (ESRD, Advanced COPD, severe Heart failure, poorly controlled blood sugar)
  • Pregnancy
  • Pancreatic cancer or suspected malignant tumor of the biliary tract
  • Acute pancreatitis
  • Patient who has confirmed biliary stones in abdominal ultrasonography or CT
  • Severe cholangitis according to TG 18 guideline
  • Total bilirubin > 4mg/dL
  • Patients who have difficulty with EUS or ERCP due to previous gastric surgery (Billroth II or TG with R-en-Y)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: EUS-ERCP group
EUS is performed first, and when the examiner finds bile duct stone in the EUS examination, ERCP is performed to remove the stone.

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is performed with radial scanning echo endoscope (Olympus GF UE260) by four endosonographers.

EUS examination is performed first, and if there is choledocholith, ERCP is performed.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed with duodenoscope (Olympus JF-260V or TJF-260V) by four endoscopists.

  • In the EUS-ERCP group, ERCP is used to remove bile duct stones diagnosed via EUS. Therefore, only ERCP is performed in patients with choledocholithiasis in EUS.
  • In the ERCP group, diagnosis and treatment of bile duct stones are performed with ERCP.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ERCP group
ERCP without EUS is performed in all patients.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is performed with duodenoscope (Olympus JF-260V or TJF-260V) by four endoscopists.

  • In the EUS-ERCP group, ERCP is used to remove bile duct stones diagnosed via EUS. Therefore, only ERCP is performed in patients with choledocholithiasis in EUS.
  • In the ERCP group, diagnosis and treatment of bile duct stones are performed with ERCP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any negative outcomes related to either a false-negative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis or the endoscopic procedure
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
Negative outcomes associated with a false-negative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were defined as follows: 1) diagnosis of choledocholithiasis during follow-up or 2) hospitalization for a condition likely associated with choledocholithiasis, such as biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, or obstructive jaundice. Negative outcomes of endoscopic procedures were assessed according to the ASGE lexicon
6 months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
Length of hospital stay
6 months after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The rate of diagnostic ERC (Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography)
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
The diagnostic ERC was defined as any ERC procedures in which no stone or sludge was removed during the procedure.
6 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Woo Hyun Paik, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

July 25, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 5, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Choledocholithiasis

Clinical Trials on EUS

3
Subscribe