Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia

February 22, 2019 updated by: Jaime Hatcher-Martin, Emory University

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling, embarrassing and often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder that can occur in anyone exposed to drugs that block dopamine receptors, including first and second generation antipsychotics and antiemetic agents. There is no way to prevent TD except preventing exposure to the inciting agents and there are no approved symptomatic therapies. Propranolol is an FDA-approved β-blocker with limited data supporting its use as a treatment for TD.

The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of TD in a double-blind, cross-over prospective manner. If propranolol is found to be an effective therapy, it will fulfill a great need in the treatment of TD with a medication that is known to be safe and inexpensive.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling, embarrassing and often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder that can occur in anyone exposed to drugs that block dopamine receptors, including first and second generation antipsychotics and antiemetic agents. There is no way to prevent TD except preventing exposure to the inciting agents and there are no approved symptomatic therapies. Propranolol is an FDA-approved β-blocker with limited data supporting its use as a treatment for TD.

The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of TD in a double-blind, cross-over prospective manner. Patients with a diagnosis of TD will be randomized to propranolol or identical placebo. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over for another eight weeks. Hence, the subjects will be their own controls. Participation in this pilot trial will provide placebo controlled blinded data that will assist in planning a larger phase II trial. If propranolol is found to be an effective therapy, it will fulfill a great need in the treatment of TD with a medication that is known to be safe and inexpensive.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18-75 years
  • diagnosis of classical TD by a movement disorder expert for at least 6 months with a baseline score of at least 2 on two of the seven items on the AIMS severity scale
  • stable on medication (either on or off dopamine blocking agents) for at least six months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • breastfeeding
  • pregnant
  • unstable psychiatric disease
  • history of asthma or COPD
  • baseline heart rate less than 60
  • history of orthostatic hypertension or its presence at screening
  • history of congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris
  • resting SBP <100 and DBP < 60
  • AV-block II or III without pacemaker
  • history of diabetes mellitus
  • previous adverse effects from use of beta-blockers
  • current use of a β-blocker and the other following drugs: quinidine, amiodarone, propafenone, digoxin, verapamil, diltiazem, clonidine, and warfarin
  • tremor, dystonia, akathisia or other non-tardive movement disorder
  • any medical illness that precludes treatment with propranolol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Propranolol Hydrochloride
Two week up-titration to reach a total dose of 20mg per oral four times per day over the first two weeks then will remain on a stable dose for six weeks. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Propranolol is started 10 mg tablet twice per day per oral, two week up-titration to reach a total dose of 20mg per oral four times per day over the first two weeks, then will remain on a stable dose for six weeks.
Other Names:
  • Inderal
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Oral Tablet
Identical placebo. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Identical placebo is started one tablet twice per day per oral, increase over the first two weeks to reach one tablet four times per day, then will remain on this dose for six weeks.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score.
Time Frame: Visit 1, 3 4, 6, 7 (up to 18 weeks)
AIMS is a rating scale that scores each individual involuntary movement type at different body locations on a five-point anchored scale. For this study, items 1-7 represent the severity portion (rated 0-4) of the scale and will be used as the primary end point. This measure will be completed at the time of the visit by the enrolling physician. In addition, a standardized video documenting the motor portion of the AIMS will be completed at baseline and eight weeks for both segments of the study. These will be placed in a randomized order and scored using the AIMS severity scale by two blinded raters using consensus measures. A comparison of the change in score from placebo to active by the blinded video raters will be the primary outcome measure.
Visit 1, 3 4, 6, 7 (up to 18 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score.
Time Frame: Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)

The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including a knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function.

The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) asks the clinician one question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.

This rating is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function in the past seven days. As symptoms and behavior can fluctuate over a week; the score should reflect the average severity level across the seven days.

Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
Change in the Clinical Global Impression -Improvement (CGI-I) score.
Time Frame: Visit 3 and 6 (up to 18 weeks)
The CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is similarly simple in its format. Each time the patient is seen after medication has been initiated, the clinician compares the patient's overall clinical condition to the one week period just prior to the initiation of medication use (the so-called baseline visit). The CGI-I score obtained at the baseline (initiation) visit serves as a basis for making this assessment. Only the following one query is rated on a seven-point scale: "Compared to the patient's condition at admission to the project [prior to medication initiation], this patient's condition is: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment."
Visit 3 and 6 (up to 18 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Short Form-36 question health survey (SF-36v2) score.
Time Frame: Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
The Short Form-36 question health survey (SF-36v2) measures a subject's functional health and well-being from their own point of view. SF-36v2 is comprised of 36 questions spanning eight health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The eight scaled scores are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The health domain scales contribute to the scoring of two summary measures: physical health and mental health.
Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
Change in the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) score.
Time Frame: Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
A modified version of the CDQ-24, a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life in patients with face/neck movement disorders such as cervical dystonia and blepharospasm. The 24 questions of the CDQ-24 are divided in five areas:stigma (6), emotional wellbeing (5), pain (3), activities of daily living (6) and family/social life (4). Each question has five possible answers, in which 0 (zero) is the best and 4 is the worst. The total score of the CDQ-24 ranges from 0 (best Quality of Life) to 100 (worst Quality of Life).
Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaime Hatcher-Martin, MD, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tardive Dyskinesia

Clinical Trials on Propranolol Hydrochloride

3
Subscribe