- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03263182
Impact of the Safe Childbirth Checklist in Luapula Province of Zambia Province of Zambia
July 30, 2018 updated by: Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc.
Impact of the Safe Childbirth Checklist on Health Worker Childbirth Practices in Luapula Province of Zambia
This study would like to determine if the introduction of the Safe Childbirth Checklist and associated mentorship can improve the adherence of skilled birth attendants (SBAs) to the essential practices of childbirth delivery.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study will use a pre-post study design to measure health worker adherence to the essential practices for delivery care outlined in the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC).
The intervention, including the introduction of the SCC and mentorship visits to support uptake, will be tested in four purposively selected health facilities in Nchelenge District, Luapula Province of Zambia.
Since the essential delivery care practices outlined in the SCC are evidence-based practices broadly accepted to support positive clinical outcomes for mothers and infants, this evaluation will focus on adherence to the checklist rather than on patient outcomes.
Data will be collected through observations of skilled birth attendants assisting with childbirth delivery before the start of the intervention and again at 3 months and 6 months post-intervention.
A health worker questionnaire will be administered at the time that the SCC is introduced and six months later to gather their perspectives on incorporating the SCC into clinical practice in Zambia.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
159
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nchelenge, Zambia
- Kabuta Rural Health Centre
-
Nchelenge, Zambia
- Kambwali Rural Health Center
-
Nchelenge, Zambia
- Kashikishi Rural Health Centre
-
Nchelenge, Zambia
- St Paul's Mission Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
All births will be observed at any time of the day (with two data collectors taking 12-hour shifts).
Observations will be conducted for a minimum of three days in all four facilities, or as long as required to observe at least 7 births.
It may not be possible for the observer to observe every delivery process at all times, particularly if multiple observations are taking place at one time, so observations will relate to activities at four specific periods (pause points): on admission, when the mother starts pushing, through the delivery to one hour after delivery, and before discharge.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- For facility observations, all consecutive deliveries will be observed. If a pregnant woman or health worker declines to participate in the consent process, no observations will be recorded.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Nchelenge Facilities
Purposively selected health facilities based on criteria including: high demand for services, perceived need for support for quality improvement, and presence of a SBA to mentor.
|
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in the average proportion of observed, SCC tasks completed per birth from selected task list
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
|
Numerator: Count of SCC tasks observed and completed for each delivery, according to the specifications for data collection outlined in the data collection procedures Denominator: Count of potential SCC items observed
|
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Characteristics of health workers participating in facility-level SCC training
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Questionnaire to understand Health worker cadre and training
|
Baseline
|
Feedback of health workers participating in facility-level SCC training
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Proportion of health workers agreeing with statements on the clarity of the training and their confidence in using the SCC after the training
|
Baseline
|
Feedback of health workers in participating facilities on SCC implementation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Questionnaire to understand Health worker cadre and training
|
6 months
|
Feedback of health workers in participating facilities on SCC implementation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Proportion of health workers agreeing with on ease of using the SCC and challenges faced in implementation
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sandra Mudhune, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Nigeria
- Principal Investigator: Francis Bwalya, Ministry of Health, Zambia
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Hayes RJ, Bennett S. Simple sample size calculation for cluster-randomized trials. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;28(2):319-26. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.2.319.
- McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
- Albolinoa S, Daglianaa G, et al. Safety and quality of maternal and neonatal pathway: A pilot study on the childbirth checklist in 9 Italian hospitals. Procedia Manufacturing. 2015; (3):242-249.
- Ariadne Labs. Implementing Checklists for Quality Improvement: The Namibian Experience using the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist.
- Central Statistical Office (CSO), Ministry of Health (MOH), Tropical Diseases Research Centre (TDRC), University of Zambia, and Macro International Inc. (2014). Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Calverton, Maryland, USA: CSO and Macro International Inc.
- Davoodi R, Soltanifar A, et al. Efficacy of Evidence Based Care on Care Quality of Mother and Infant in 3 Teaching Hospitals: A Protocol. Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Journal. 2013 Dec 14; 2(2):97-100.
- Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
- Hirschhorn LR, Semrau K, Kodkany B, Churchill R, Kapoor A, Spector J, Ringer S, Firestone R, Kumar V, Gawande A. Learning before leaping: integration of an adaptive study design process prior to initiation of BetterBirth, a large-scale randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India. Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 14;10:117. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0309-y.
- Kumar S, Yadav V, Balasubramaniam S, Jain Y, Joshi CS, Saran K, Sood B. Effectiveness of the WHO SCC on improving adherence to essential practices during childbirth, in resource constrained settings. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 8;16(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1139-x.
- Kumari S, Panicker R, et al. Evaluation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist Program in Rajasthan, India: The How and What of the Evaluation Efforts. Journal of Public Health in Developing Countries. 2016 Aug 11;2(2);212-222.
- Moyer CA, Mustafa A. Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2013 Aug 20;10:40. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-40.
- Ministry of Health [Zambia]. Health Sector Payroll Data. January 2014.
- Ministry of Health [Zambia]. Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Training Process Evaluation Report. February 2017.
- Ministry of Health [Zambia]. Zambia National Emergency Obstetric and Newborn Care (EmONC) Needs Assessment 2014-5. January 2017.
- Patabendige M, Senanayake H. Implementation of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program at a tertiary care setting in Sri Lanka: a developing country experience. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Feb 4;15:12. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0436-0.
- Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, Fry D, Lobis S. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Feb;88(2):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.026. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
- Spector JM, Agrawal P, Kodkany B, Lipsitz S, Lashoher A, Dziekan G, Bahl R, Merialdi M, Mathai M, Lemer C, Gawande A. Improving quality of care for maternal and newborn health: prospective pilot study of the WHO safe childbirth checklist program. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035151. Epub 2012 May 16.
- Spector JM, Lashoher A, Agrawal P, Lemer C, Dziekan G, Bahl R, Mathai M, Merialdi M, Berry W, Gawande AA. Designing the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist program to improve quality of care at childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Aug;122(2):164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
- Wang P, Connor AL, Guo E, Nambao M, Chanda-Kapata P, Lambo N, Phiri C. Measuring the impact of non-monetary incentives on facility delivery in rural Zambia: a clustered randomised controlled trial. Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Apr;21(4):515-24. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12678.
- WHO. Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant. A joint statement by WHO, ICM, and FIGO. Geneva: Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization. 2004.
- WHO. Making pregnancy safer the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by WHO, ICM and FIGO. Geneva: World health organization (WHO). Department of Reproductive Health and Research (RHR). 2004.
- Mudhune S, Phiri SC, Prescott MR, McCarthy EA, Banda A, Haimbe P, Mwansa FD, Mwiche A, Silumesii A, Micheck K, Shakwelele H, Prust ML. Improving the quality of childbirth services in Zambia through introduction of the Safe Childbirth Checklist and systems-focused mentorship. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244310. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244310. eCollection 2020.
- Mudhune S, Phiri SC, Prescott MR, McCarthy EA, Banda A, Haimbe P, Mwansa FD, Mwiche A, Bwalya F, Kabamba M, Shakwelele H, Prust ML. Impact of the Safe Childbirth Checklist on health worker childbirth practices in Luapula province of Zambia: a pre-post study. BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5813-y.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 4, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 4, 2018
Study Completion (Actual)
May 4, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 25, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
August 28, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 31, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 30, 2018
Last Verified
July 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3DE SCC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Undecided
IPD Plan Description
This is yet to be finalized with the Ministry of Health, Zambia.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Maternal Death
-
University of OttawaJimma University; Ethiopian Ministry of Health, Jimma ZoneCompletedMaternal Mortality | Maternal Morbidity
-
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Brigham and Women's Hospital; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; World Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedMaternal Death | Stillbirth | Maternal Morbidity | Neonatal DeathIndia
-
University of CalgaryCanadian International Development AgencyCompletedChild Mortality | Maternal Mortality (All Cause)Uganda
-
Massachusetts General HospitalMbarara University of Science and TechnologyUnknownPregnancy Complications | Maternal Death During ChildbirthUganda
-
Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action LabMacArthur Foundation; Planned Parenthood Federation NigeriaCompletedMaternal MortalityNigeria
-
University of CopenhagenMerck Sharp & Dohme LLCCompletedMaternal Mortality | Perinatal MortalityDenmark
-
Society for Applied StudiesWorld Health OrganizationCompletedStill Births | Neonatal Deaths | Maternal DeathsIndia
-
Jimma UniversityRecruitingMaternal Behavior | Maternal DeathEthiopia
-
Hawassa UniversityUniversidad Pública de NavarraRecruiting
-
Express CollaborativeUnknownMaternal Death During ChildbirthCanada
Clinical Trials on Introduction of the Safe Childbirth Checklist
-
University of California, San FranciscoMakerere University; Kenya Medical Research InstituteCompletedPregnancy Complications | Low Birth Weight | Preterm Labor | PreTerm Birth | StillbirthKenya, Uganda
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedPregnancy | Quality of Care | Childbirth | Puerperium
-
Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Brigham and Women's Hospital; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; World Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedMaternal Death | Stillbirth | Maternal Morbidity | Neonatal DeathIndia
-
Monash UniversityThe Alfred; Western Highlands Provincial Health Authority; Queensland HealthUnknown
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Fear | Education | Fear of Childbirth | BirthTurkey
-
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Massachusetts General Hospital; Yale University; Massachusetts Institute of Technology and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Makerere UniversityCompletedSurgical Safety Checklist Compliance | Perioperative Surgical Adverse Events
-
Centre Hospitalier René DubosCompleted
-
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of CirculationNot yet recruitingFrequency of Embolic Complications | Frequency of Ischemic ComplicationsRussian Federation