BRIDGE Device for Post-operative Pain Control (BRIDGE)

May 5, 2026 updated by: Duke University

Auricular Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Field Stimulation (PENFS) Using the BRIDGE Device for Post-Operative Pain Control in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

Auricular neurostimulation is a potential novel and non-invasive method of pain control following liver transplantation in a growing patient population with the probability of significant impact on economics and morbidity. The investigators propose a pilot study to investigate the effects of auricular neurostimulation in patients receiving a liver transplantation. The investigator will investigate the effects of auricular neurostimulation with this novel device and compare it to the current standard of care for pain management following liver transplantation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized study to determine the efficacy of the BRIDGE device in reducing pain and opioid use in patients following liver transplantation. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ration to one of the below groups:

Group 1: BRIDGE device will be placed prior to start of the surgery with standard of care pain control analgesia

Group 2: Subjects will receive the standard of care pain control analgesia

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Inclusion criteria:

    • ≥18 years of age but <70 years of age
    • Actively listed for isolated liver transplantation
    • Subject or legally authorized representative able to sign informed consent
    • Not currently treated with opioids or any medications that may interact with opioids
    • English speaking
    • Willing and able to participate and consent to this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of acute liver failure or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)
  • Anticipated that the subject will require a new roux-en-y hepaticojejunostomy
  • Current use of opioid use or other substance abuse.
  • Chronic pain disorders
  • Need for regional anesthesia (regional nerve blocks or epidurals)
  • Adhesive allergy/sensitivity
  • Subject admitted to the ICU at the time of transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
BRIDGE device will be placed prior to start of the surgery with standard of care pain control analgesia
an externally placed, FDA-cleared device that delivers percutaneous electrical stimulation with alternating frequencies to branches of cranial nerves (V, VII, IX, and X) through the external ear via a field effect
No Intervention: Group 2
Subjects will receive the standard of care pain control analgesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Usage After Surgery as Measured by Total Milligrams of Morphine or Equivalent (MEQ)
Time Frame: up to day 30
Comparison between study groups (BRIDGE device vs. Standard of Care)
up to day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Level
Time Frame: up to day 30
Evaluation of the pain score in the two groups (SOC and with device) at the end of surgery. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) ranges from 0-10, and higher scores indicate greater pain.
up to day 30
Reduction in Nausea Scores as Measured by a 4-item Questionnaire Response
Time Frame: up to day 30
Determination of the intensity of nausea in the two groups (SOC and with device). Clinically important PONV is defined as a total score ≥50 at any time throughout the study period. Scale is 0 to infinity.
up to day 30
Reduction in Vomiting Scores as Measured by a 4-item Questionnaire Response
Time Frame: up to day 30
Determination of the intensity of vomiting in the two groups (SOC and with device) using the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Impact Scale, where the choices are: No, Sometimes, Often of most of the time, and All of the time.
up to day 30
Reduction in Time for Return of Bowel Function as Measured by Length to Time of Bowel Functioning Return.
Time Frame: up to day 5
Evaluation of return of bowel function noting day of bowel movement occurrence in both groups.
up to day 5
Incidence of Post-operative Ileus Will be Measured by Number of Participants Who Need Nasogastric Decompression for >48 Hours
Time Frame: up to 48 hours
Determination of the presence of an ileus in the two groups (SOC and with device)
up to 48 hours
Number of Participants Who Reported Post-operative Mobility Issues as Measured by the Patient Symptom Surveys
Time Frame: up to 30 days
Determination of mobility with in the two groups (SOC and with device)
up to 30 days
Average Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days
Determination of length of hospital stay with in the two groups (SOC and with device)
up to 30 days
Time to Physical Function
Time Frame: 24 hours after device has been removed
Time to physical function measured by survey
24 hours after device has been removed
Incidence of Complications
Time Frame: 24 hours after device has been removed
Complications related to pain control after the device is removed.
24 hours after device has been removed
Number of Participants Who Were Re-hospitalized
Time Frame: up to 30 days
up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alicia Mavis, MD, Duke Universtity

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Diseases

Clinical Trials on BRIDGE device

Subscribe