A New Modified Suture Bridge Technique

A New Modified Suture Bridge Technique for Medium-sized Rotator Cuff Tears: Functional and Radiological Outcomes of a Prospective Study

We aimed to introduce a new modified suture bridge technique and report the clinical outcomes and radiological assessments of modified suture bridge technique for medium rotator cuff tears.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose: We aimed to introduce a new modified suture bridge technique and report the clinical outcomes and radiological assessments of modified suture bridge technique for medium rotator cuff tears.

Methods: We prospectively followed 50 consecutive patients with medium rotator cuff tears treated with the modified suture bridge (MSB) or traditional suture bridge technique (TSB) from December 2018 and December 2019. On the basis of preoperative findings and MRI performance, 26 patients underwent MSB repair whereas 24 underwent TSB repair. Range of shoulder motion, visual analog scale score (VAS score), University of California-Los Angeles score (UCLA score), Constant-Murley shoulder score (Constant score), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES score) were assessed. Magnetic resonance imaging were performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shangdong, China
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) full-thickness medium tears (1-3cm) of primary supraspinatus (SSP) tendon was identified on preoperative MRI and intraoperative arthroscopy, (2) undesirable conservative treatment for 3 months, (3)completed follow-up of 12 months postoperatively and patients who adhered to the rehabilitation plan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) previous shoulder surgery, (2) Other pathological changes that would need to be addressed at the time of arthroscopic surgery, such as rotator cuff tear involving the subscapular (SSC) tendon,biceps tendon injury, (3) failure to follow our postoperative rehabilitation protocol and patients without regular follow-up.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The traditional suture bridge technique group
For the TSB group, if the tear type is confirmed to be medium-sized during the operation, TSB technique will be performed
(A) Limbs of the sutures from the medial anchor were passed through torn tendon (B) the suture limbs were tied in a horizontal mattress suture pattern (C) the lateral row pressed the free tails of the knotted line on the greater tubercle of the humerus (D) the effect after completion of the TSB technique
Experimental: The modified suture bridge technique group
For the MSB group, if the tear type is confirmed to be medium-sized during the operation, TSB technique will be performed
(A) Limbs of the sutures from the medial anchor and 2 tendon sutures were passed through the same position of torn tendon (B) the lateral row pressed free tails of the two tendon lines on the greater tubercle of the humerus (C) after examination of sufficient tension and stable fixation, sutures of medial row was knotted (D) the effect after completion of the MSB technique

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cuff integrity grade of MRI assessment
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
Grade I: sufficient thickness of tendon; Grade II: sufficient thickness of tendon and partial high intensity within tendon; Grade III: insufficient thickness of tendon without discontinuity; Grade IV: slight discontinuity in 1 or 2 images of oblique coronal plane and sagittal plane; Grade V:obvious discontinuity of tendons in more than 2 images of both oblique coronal plane and sagittal plane.
at 12 months postoperatively
Muscle atrophy grade of MRI assessment
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
Grade I: a ratio between 1.00 and 0.60 can be considered as normal or slightly atrophied; Grade II: values between 0.60 and 0.40 suggest moderate atrophy. Grade III: values below 0.40 indicate serious or severe atrophy.
at 12 months postoperatively
Fatty degeneration grade of MRI assessment
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
Grade 0: completely normal muscle; Grade 1: muscle contains some fatty streaks; Grade 2: there is more muscle than fat; Grade 3: equal distribution of fat and muscle; grade 4: more fat was present than muscle. Among them, grade 0 is normal, grade 1 and 2 are considered moderate, grade 3 and 4 are classified as severe.
at 12 months postoperatively
Range of shoulder motion
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
Different range of motion of shoulder joint
at 12 months postoperatively
The Visual Analog Scale score
Time Frame: preoperatively
Assess pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
preoperatively
The Visual Analog Scale score
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
Assess pain on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
at 12 months postoperatively
University of California-Los Angeles score
Time Frame: preoperatively
The score mainly consists of two parts. Patients subjectively evaluate pain and functional activity; and doctors objectively evaluate shoulder joint mobility and muscle strength. Possible scores range from 0 to 35, a higher score means a better result.
preoperatively
University of California-Los Angeles score
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
The score mainly consists of two parts. Patients subjectively evaluate pain and functional activity; and doctors objectively evaluate shoulder joint mobility and muscle strength. Possible scores range from 0 to 35, a higher score means a better result.
at 12 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant-Murray Shoulder score
Time Frame: preoperatively
An assessment method often used by orthopedic surgeons when assessing the condition of patients with shoulder joints.Possible scores range from 0 to 100#a higher score means a better result.
preoperatively
Constant-Murray Shoulder score
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
An assessment method often used by orthopedic surgeons when assessing the condition of patients with shoulder joints.Possible scores range from 0 to 100#a higher score means a better result.
at 12 months postoperatively
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score
Time Frame: preoperatively
The evaluation criteria used to assess shoulder joint function based on the patients' pain and accumulated daily activities. Possible scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the shoulder joint function.
preoperatively
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score
Time Frame: at 12 months postoperatively
The evaluation criteria used to assess shoulder joint function based on the patients' pain and accumulated daily activities. Possible scores range from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the better the shoulder joint function.
at 12 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tengbo Yu, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 2, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Proposals should be directed to zhangsports2021@sina.com. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement. Data are available for 5 years at a third party website

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on traditional suture bridge technique

3
Subscribe