Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of a "Revitalizing" Face Treatment

September 6, 2017 updated by: Adele Sparavigna, Derming SRL
Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of a"revitalizing" face treatment consisting of a day and a night cream

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Aim of the study was to evaluate clinically and by non-invasive instrumental evaluations the activity of a "revitalizing" face treatment consisting of a day and a night cream, applied for an uninterrupted period of 3 months, by female volunteers, aged 35-60 years, with aging/photo aging of moderate grade.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Monza-brianza
      • Monza, Monza-brianza, Italy, 20900
        • DERMING

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female sex,
  • age 35-60 years,
  • Caucasian subjects,
  • presence of moderate face ritidosis,
  • agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up,
  • accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator,
  • accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, face cleansing and make- up use,
  • agreeing not to apply or take any product or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkle and skin qualities during the entire duration of the study,
  • accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study,
  • no participation in a similar study currently or during the previous 3 months
  • accepting to sign the Informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy,
  • lactation,
  • sensitivity to the test products or their ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit),
  • subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable.
  • presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations,
  • recurrent facial/labial herpes,
  • clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
  • endocrine disease,
  • hepatic disorder,
  • renal disorder,
  • cardiac disorder,
  • pulmonary disease,
  • cancer,
  • neurological or psychological disease,
  • inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease,
  • drug allergy.
  • anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic (application on the face) and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago),
  • using of drugs or dietary supplements able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Nutriage SPF 30 day cream and Nutriage night cream
Application of the study products (day cream at the morning and night cream at the evening), for an uninterrupted period of 3 months.
A fixed quantity of both cosmetic products was applied for an uninterrupted period of 3 months, on the face included the submental area (day cream at the morning and the night cream at the evening), preferentially always at the same hour, with a mild massage

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of wrinkles grade, around the eyes (Crow's feet)
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Variation of wrinkles grade from baseline of the Glogau's reference photographic scale (visual score from 1-4) where:

  • Type 1: early wrinkles
  • Type 2: wrinkle in motion
  • Type 3: wrinkles at rest
  • Type 4: Only wrinkles
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of wrinkles grade of nasolabial folds
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Variation of wrinkles grade from baseline of the Lemperle's reference photographic scale (visual score from 1-6) where:

  • Grade 1: no wrinkles
  • Grade 2: just perceptible wrinkles
  • Grade 3: shallow wrinkles
  • Grade 4: moderately deep wrinkles
  • Grade 5: deep wrinkles, well-defined folds
  • Grade 6: very deep wrinkles, redundant fold
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of skin surface microrelief's regularity
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Variation of skin surface microrelief's regularity grade from baseline of cheek surface microrelief photographic scale where:

  • Grade 1:very regular
  • Grade 2: regular
  • Grade 3: irregular
  • Grade 4: very irregular.
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of skin resistance to pinching clinical score
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score:

0 = very important

  1. = important
  2. = moderate
  3. = weak
  4. = very weak
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of skin resistance to traction clinical score
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score:

0 = very important

  1. = important
  2. = moderate
  3. = weak
  4. = very weak
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of skin recovery after pinching clinical score
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score:

0 = very important

  1. = important
  2. = moderate
  3. = weak
  4. = very weak
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of skin dryness clinical score
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score:

0 = very hydrated skin

  1. = hydrated skin
  2. = normal skin
  3. = kindly dry skin
  4. = dry skin
  5. = very dry skin
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Change of vascular and pigmentary homogeneity clinical score
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score:

0 = very homogeneous

  1. = homogeneous
  2. = quite not homogeneous
  3. = not homogeneous
  4. = very not homogeneous
  5. = marked not homogeneous
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of roughness profilometric parameters
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Crow's feet profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Photographic documentation (3D pictures)
Time Frame: Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)
Three-dimensional pictures of the face taken by VECTRA H1 handheld imaging system.
Baseline visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 21, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 8, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • E0517

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Face Aging/Photo Aging of Moderate Grade

Subscribe